Question 2 of 7: Question 2 (Part A, Question A2): Pitot-Static Airspeed at Altitude and the Compressibility Error
Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)
Notes on this paper
Paper format. National Exams, May 2014 — 07-Mec-B6
Advanced Fluid Mechanics. Three hours, open book, any non-communicating
calculator permitted. Part A holds four questions and the candidate answers any three of them
(42 per cent of the paper, so 14 marks each); Part B holds three questions and the
candidate answers any two (58 per cent, so 29 marks each). All seven questions
are worked here.
The paper supplies an aid sheet of compressible-flow, boundary-layer, Navier–Stokes and
potential-flow relations; the skin-friction coefficients used below are taken from that sheet
(not from the Blasius/White constants a textbook would give) so that the arithmetic
matches what a candidate had in front of them.
Reference texts.
F. M. White, Fluid Mechanics, 8th ed. — Ch. 5 (dimensional analysis and
similitude), Ch. 7 (external flow and plate drag), Ch. 8 (potential flow), Ch. 9 (compressible
flow, Fanno line, normal shocks).
F. M. White, Viscous Fluid Flow, 3rd ed. — Ch. 3 (exact solutions of the
Navier–Stokes equations, annular Couette flow), Ch. 6 (turbulent wall flow).
J. D. Anderson, Modern Compressible Flow, 3rd ed. — Ch. 3 (normal shock
waves), Ch. 5 (quasi-one-dimensional nozzle and diffuser flow).
P. K. Kundu, I. M. Cohen and D. R. Dowling, Fluid Mechanics, 6th ed. —
Ch. 6 (irrotational flow, method of images), Ch. 9 (laminar internal flow).
H. Schlichting and K. Gersten, Boundary-Layer Theory, 8th ed. — Ch. 21
(plate drag with a mixed laminar/turbulent boundary layer).
R. W. Fox, A. T. McDonald and J. W. Mitchell, Introduction to Fluid Mechanics,
10th ed. — Ch. 7 (similitude and model testing), Ch. 13 (compressible flow with
friction).
Question 2 (Part A, Question A2): Pitot-Static Airspeed at Altitude and the Compressibility Error (14 marks)
Given. Free-stream static pressure \(P = 30\ \text{kPa}\); free-stream static
temperature \(T = -55\,{}^{\circ}\text{C} = 218.15\ \text{K}\); measured stagnation pressure
\(P_o = 51\ \text{kPa}\); air with \(R = 287\ \text{J}\,\text{kg}^{-1}\text{K}^{-1}\) and
\(\gamma = 1.4\).
Find. The true airspeed from the compressible (isentropic) relation, the speed
an incompressible Bernoulli reading would give, and the resulting error.
Figure 2.1 — Pitot-static probe: the total port stagnates the
flow isentropically to \(P_o\), the static ports read \(P\), and the instrument infers speed from
the difference.
Approach. Check first that the pressure ratio is subsonic (no bow shock), then
invert the isentropic stagnation-pressure relation for the Mach number, multiply by the local speed
of sound, and compare against \(\sqrt{2\Delta P/\rho}\).
Confirm the flow is subsonic, so no shock stands ahead of the probe. The
Rayleigh-pitot limit for sonic flight is \(P_o/P = (1+\tfrac{\gamma-1}{2})^{\gamma/(\gamma-1)} =
1.2^{3.5} = 1.893\). Here
\[\frac{P_o}{P}=\frac{51}{30}=1.700 < 1.893,\]
so the aircraft is subsonic, the stagnation process along the stagnation streamline is isentropic,
and the plain isentropic relation applies. (Had the ratio exceeded 1.893 we would have needed the
Rayleigh-pitot formula across a normal shock instead.)
Invert the isentropic stagnation relation for Mach number. The aid sheet gives
\(P_o/P=\left(1+\tfrac{\gamma-1}{2}M^2\right)^{\gamma/(\gamma-1)}\), so
\[\begin{aligned}M&=\sqrt{\frac{2}{\gamma-1}\left[\left(\frac{P_o}{P}\right)^{\frac{\gamma-1}{\gamma}}-1\right]}\\&=\sqrt{\frac{2}{0.4}\left[1.700^{0.2857}-1\right]}=\sqrt{5(1.16371-1)}\end{aligned}\]
\[\boxed{M = 0.9047}\]
which is high subsonic — a realistic cruise Mach number for a transport aircraft at 11 km.
Compute the local speed of sound. With \(T = 218.15\ \text{K}\),
\[a=\sqrt{\gamma R T}=\sqrt{(1.4)(287)(218.15)}=\sqrt{87\,653}=296.06\ \text{m/s}.\]
The cold stratosphere is why a 268 m/s airspeed is already Mach 0.90; at sea level the same speed
would be only Mach 0.79.
Repeat with the incompressible Bernoulli equation. Bernoulli in the form
\(P_o = P+\tfrac12\rho V^2\) needs the free-stream density,
\[\rho=\frac{P}{RT}=\frac{30\,000}{(287)(218.15)}=0.4792\ \text{kg/m}^3,\]
whence
\[V_{\text{Bern}}=\sqrt{\frac{2(P_o-P)}{\rho}}=\sqrt{\frac{2(21\,000)}{0.4792}}=296.1\ \text{m/s}.\]
Quantify the error. The incompressible reading overstates the speed by
\[\Delta V = 296.1-267.9=28.2\ \text{m/s},\qquad
\boxed{\frac{\Delta V}{V}=+10.5\ \text{per cent}}\]
Bernoulli over-predicts because it ignores the density rise in the stagnation process: the real
fluid packs itself denser at the probe mouth, so a given speed produces a larger pressure
rise than the constant-density model expects, and reading that pressure rise with the
constant-density formula returns too high a speed.