Question 3 of 7: Question 3 (Part A, Question A3): Hydrogen Pipeline — Fanno-Flow Booster Spacing, Compressor Power and Cooler Duty
Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)
Notes on this paper
Paper format. National Exams, May 2014 — 07-Mec-B6
Advanced Fluid Mechanics. Three hours, open book, any non-communicating
calculator permitted. Part A holds four questions and the candidate answers any three of them
(42 per cent of the paper, so 14 marks each); Part B holds three questions and the
candidate answers any two (58 per cent, so 29 marks each). All seven questions
are worked here.
The paper supplies an aid sheet of compressible-flow, boundary-layer, Navier–Stokes and
potential-flow relations; the skin-friction coefficients used below are taken from that sheet
(not from the Blasius/White constants a textbook would give) so that the arithmetic
matches what a candidate had in front of them.
Reference texts.
F. M. White, Fluid Mechanics, 8th ed. — Ch. 5 (dimensional analysis and
similitude), Ch. 7 (external flow and plate drag), Ch. 8 (potential flow), Ch. 9 (compressible
flow, Fanno line, normal shocks).
F. M. White, Viscous Fluid Flow, 3rd ed. — Ch. 3 (exact solutions of the
Navier–Stokes equations, annular Couette flow), Ch. 6 (turbulent wall flow).
J. D. Anderson, Modern Compressible Flow, 3rd ed. — Ch. 3 (normal shock
waves), Ch. 5 (quasi-one-dimensional nozzle and diffuser flow).
P. K. Kundu, I. M. Cohen and D. R. Dowling, Fluid Mechanics, 6th ed. —
Ch. 6 (irrotational flow, method of images), Ch. 9 (laminar internal flow).
H. Schlichting and K. Gersten, Boundary-Layer Theory, 8th ed. — Ch. 21
(plate drag with a mixed laminar/turbulent boundary layer).
R. W. Fox, A. T. McDonald and J. W. Mitchell, Introduction to Fluid Mechanics,
10th ed. — Ch. 7 (similitude and model testing), Ch. 13 (compressible flow with
friction).
Question 3 (Part A, Question A3): Hydrogen Pipeline — Fanno-Flow Booster Spacing, Compressor Power and Cooler Duty (14 marks)
Find. The maximum booster spacing (the choking length), the shaft power of each
booster compressor, the heat each cooler must reject, and the static pressure and temperature of the
hydrogen delivered at Calgary.
Figure 3.1 — Route schematic. Each adiabatic run of pipe is a
Fanno process that drives the flow toward \(M=1\); each booster restores the 1 MPa / 243 K station
outlet state with a compressor followed by an aftercooler.
Approach. Adiabatic pipe flow with friction is Fanno flow: compute the station
Mach number from continuity, read the choking length from the Fanno function, then treat each
booster as an adiabatic compressor (total-to-total) followed by an isobaric aftercooler, and march
the leftover length to find the delivery state.
Fix the station-outlet state and its Mach number. From the ideal-gas law and
continuity,
\[\begin{aligned}\rho_1&=\frac{P_1}{RT_1}=\frac{10^{6}}{(4124)(243.15)}=0.9973\ \text{kg/m}^3,\\V_1&=\frac{\dot m}{\rho_1 A}=\frac{74.3}{(0.9973)(3.1416)}=23.72\ \text{m/s}.\end{aligned}\]
With \(a_1=\sqrt{\gamma R T_1}=\sqrt{(1.4)(4124)(243.15)}=1184.8\ \text{m/s}\) (hydrogen is very
"fast"), the Mach number is
\[\boxed{M_1=\frac{23.72}{1184.8}=0.02002}\]
Because \(M_1\) is so small the stagnation state is barely distinguishable from the static one:
\(T_{o1}=243.17\) K and \(P_{o1}=1.00028\) MPa.
Evaluate the Fanno function at the station outlet. For adiabatic flow with
friction in a constant-area duct,
\[\frac{fL^{*}}{D}=\frac{1-M^2}{\gamma M^2}+\frac{\gamma+1}{2\gamma}\ln\!\left[\frac{(\gamma+1)M^2}{2+(\gamma-1)M^2}\right].\]
Substituting \(M_1 = 0.020016\) and \(\gamma=1.4\) gives \(1782.20-6.55=1775.65\). The first term
dominates completely at low Mach number, where it reduces to \(1/(\gamma M^2)\).
Convert to the maximum booster spacing. \(L^{*}\) is the length that would
drive the flow to \(M=1\); no longer run is possible without reducing the mass flow, so it is
the maximum spacing:
\[L_{\max}=\frac{D}{f}\left(\frac{fL^{*}}{D}\right)=\frac{2.0}{0.03}(1775.65)=1.1838\times10^{5}\ \text{m}\]
\[\boxed{L_{\max}=118.4\ \text{km}}\]
Find the state at the end of a full-length run. At the choking point the Fanno
reference relations give
\[\begin{aligned}\frac{T_1}{T^{*}}&=\frac{\gamma+1}{2+(\gamma-1)M_1^2}=1.1999,\\\frac{P_1}{P^{*}}&=\frac{1}{M_1}\sqrt{\frac{\gamma+1}{2+(\gamma-1)M_1^2}}=54.73,\end{aligned}\]
so \(T^{*}=202.64\ \text{K}\) and \(P^{*}=18.27\ \text{kPa}\). The corresponding stagnation
pressure is \(P_o^{*}=P^{*}(1.2)^{3.5}=34.59\ \text{kPa}\), while \(T_o\) is unchanged at 243.17 K
because the pipe is insulated. Friction has destroyed 96.5 per cent of the stagnation pressure over
one span.
Size the compressor. Each booster must lift the total pressure from
\(P_o^{*}=34.59\) kPa back to \(P_{o1}=1000.3\) kPa, a total-to-total ratio of
\[\Pi=\frac{P_{o1}}{P_o^{*}}=\frac{1000.3}{34.59}=28.92 .\]
The isentropic total enthalpy rise is
\[\begin{aligned}\Delta h_{o,s}&=c_p T_{o,\text{in}}\left(\Pi^{\frac{\gamma-1}{\gamma}}-1\right)\\&=(14\,350)(243.17)\left(28.92^{0.2857}-1\right)\\&=(14\,350)(243.17)(1.6151)=5636\ \text{kJ/kg},\end{aligned}\]
and dividing by the total-to-total efficiency,
\[\Delta h_o=\frac{\Delta h_{o,s}}{\eta_{tt}}=\frac{5636}{0.85}=6630\ \text{kJ/kg}.\]
Compressor power.
\[\boxed{\dot W_c=\dot m\,\Delta h_o=(74.3)(6630)=4.926\times10^{5}\ \text{kW}=493\ \text{MW}}\]
The gas leaves the compressor at \(T_{o,\text{out}}=243.17+6630/14.35=705.2\ \text{K}\).
Cooler duty. The aftercooler must return the gas to the station outlet
condition, i.e. back to \(T_o=243.17\) K. Since it starts and ends at the same stagnation
temperature it entered the booster with, the heat removed is exactly the work put in:
\[\dot Q=\dot m\,c_p\,(T_{o,\text{out}}-T_{o,\text{in}})=(74.3)(14.35)(705.2-243.17)\]
\[\boxed{\dot Q=4.926\times10^{5}\ \text{kW}=493\ \text{MW rejected per station}}\]
This identity \(\dot Q=\dot W_c\) is not a coincidence: over one complete station-to-station cycle
the gas returns to its initial state, so the first law demands that every joule of shaft work
eventually leave as heat.
March the route and find the delivery state. With \(L_{\max}=118.4\) km, the
300 km route needs \(300/118.38=2.53\) spans, so two intermediate boosters are installed (at 118.4
km and 236.8 km) and the final leg is
\(L_f=300-2(118.38)=63.25\ \text{km}\). Over that leg the Fanno function falls by
\(fL_f/D=(0.03)(63\,247)/2.0=948.7\), leaving
\[\begin{aligned}\left.\frac{fL^{*}}{D}\right|_{\text{Calgary}}&=1775.65-948.70=826.94\\&\Rightarrow\ M_3=0.02927 .\end{aligned}\]
Convert the exit Mach number to static conditions. Using the same Fanno
reference relations with \(T^{*}=202.64\) K and \(P^{*}=18.27\) kPa,
\[\begin{aligned}T_3&=\frac{T_o}{1+\tfrac{\gamma-1}{2}M_3^2}=243.13\ \text{K},\\P_3&=P^{*}\frac{1}{M_3}\sqrt{\frac{\gamma+1}{2+(\gamma-1)M_3^2}}=683.7\ \text{kPa}.\end{aligned}\]
\[\boxed{P_3=0.684\ \text{MPa},\qquad T_3=243.1\ \text{K}=-30.0\,{}^{\circ}\text{C}}\]
The temperature barely moves because the flow is so slow that the static and stagnation
temperatures are nearly equal and the duct is insulated; essentially all of the friction shows up as
pressure loss, not heating.
Quantity
Symbol
Value
Station-outlet Mach number
\(M_1\)
0.02002
Fanno function at station outlet
\(fL^{*}/D\)
1775.6
Maximum booster spacing
\(L_{\max}\)
118.4 km
State at end of a full span
\(P^{*},\ T^{*}\)
18.27 kPa, 202.6 K
Compressor total pressure ratio
\(\Pi\)
28.92
Compressor power (each)
\(\dot W_c\)
493 MW
Compressor discharge total temperature
\(T_{o,\text{out}}\)
705.2 K
Cooler heat rejected (each)
\(\dot Q\)
493 MW
Booster stations on the route
—
Edmonton + 2 intermediate; final leg 63.25 km
Delivery static pressure
\(P_3\)
0.684 MPa
Delivery static temperature
\(T_3\)
243.1 K (−30.0 °C)
Check: friction-factor convention and design realism. The
paper says only "the friction factor is 0.03", so the Darcy–Weisbach convention is used here
(\(fL/D\), not the Fanning \(4fL/D\)). This is the right reading on two counts: 0.03 is a plausible
Darcy value for a large commercial-steel line, and the Fanning reading would quarter the
spacing to 29.6 km, which is not a "maximum distance between booster stations" any operator would
recognise. Second, spacing the boosters at exactly \(L_{\max}\) means the gas arrives at each
station choked at 18 kPa, which is why the compressor duty comes out at an enormous 493 MW; a real
line is spaced at a fraction of \(L^{*}\) (typically \(M\le0.1\) at the station inlet) so the
pressure ratio stays near 1.5–2. The 493 MW figure is the correct answer to the question as
posed, not a design recommendation.