Question 2 of 6: Convergent–divergent nozzle between two reservoirs, with a mercury manometer
Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)
Notes on this paper
Paper format. National Exams, May 2015 —
07-Mec-B6 Advanced Fluid Mechanics. Three hours, OPEN BOOK, any
approved Sharp or Casio calculator permitted. Six questions are printed; any five of them
constitute a complete paper and each carries an equal 20 marks, with the item weights shown
in the left margin. No aid sheet is bound into the paper — the open-book rule is the candidate’s table source, so the compressible-flow ratios below are quoted in closed form rather than read from a chart. All six questions are solved here.
Reference texts. Solutions follow the conventions of the texts the
EGBC syllabus recommends for this subject:
F. M. White, Fluid Mechanics, 8th ed. — potential-flow building blocks
(§4.4, §8.2–8.3), turbulent flat-plate layers (§7.4), dimensional
analysis (§5.2–5.4), duct flow with friction (§9.7).
F. M. White, Viscous Fluid Flow, 3rd ed. — exact solutions of the
Navier–Stokes equations and lubrication theory (§3.2, §3.9).
J. D. Anderson, Modern Compressible Flow, 3rd ed. — quasi-one-dimensional
nozzle flow, normal shocks and Fanno flow (Ch. 3 and Ch. 5).
P. K. Kundu, I. M. Cohen & D. R. Dowling, Fluid Mechanics, 6th ed. —
complex potential and plane potential flows (Ch. 6); boundary layers (Ch. 9).
B. R. Munson et al., Fundamentals of Fluid Mechanics, 8th ed. —
Buckingham Pi method and model similarity (Ch. 7).
SI units throughout. Air and mercury properties are those printed in the question; all
pressures are absolute unless a gauge value is stated explicitly, which is standard Canadian
practice for this examination.
Question 2: Convergent–divergent nozzle between two reservoirs, with a mercury manometer (20 marks)
Mercury manometer deflection (throat to reservoir b)
$h$
15 cm = 0.150 m
Mercury density
$\rho_{\text{Hg}}$
13 550 kg/m³
Ratio of specific heats, gas constant
$\gamma,\ R$
1.4, 287 J/(kg·K)
The flow is inviscid and adiabatic, so it is isentropic everywhere except across any shock.
Find. The back-reservoir pressure $P_b$ implied by the manometer, whether
a normal shock exists, where that shock stands, and the manometer deflection that ideal
supersonic (design) expansion would produce.
Figure 2.1 — The
nozzle, the manometer that spans throat to back reservoir, and the ladder of limiting back
pressures for $A_E/A_T=3.5$. Any $P_b$ inside the shaded band puts a normal shock inside the
divergent section; this nozzle operates at 178.4 kPa, near the middle of the band.
Approach. Assume the throat is choked, read the throat static pressure
from the critical ratio, add the manometer head to obtain $P_b$, then compare $P_b$ with the
three limiting back pressures that the area ratio $A_E/A_T$ defines — first choking,
shock in the exit plane, and perfect expansion — to place the operating point. Finally
locate the shock by matching the exit static pressure to $P_b$.
Part (a) — assume the throat is choked and fix the throat static pressure.
A convergent–divergent nozzle with any appreciable pressure drop reaches $M=1$ at the
throat; the assumption is checked in step 4. At $M=1$ the isentropic ratio is
$$\frac{P_0}{P}=\left(1+\frac{\gamma-1}{2}M^{2}\right)^{\gamma/(\gamma-1)}
=\left(\frac{\gamma+1}{2}\right)^{\gamma/(\gamma-1)}=1.8929,$$
so with $P_0=P_a=300$ kPa the throat static pressure is
$$P_T=\frac{300}{1.8929}=158.5\ \text{kPa}.$$
Convert the mercury deflection into a pressure difference. The
manometer legs connect the throat tap to reservoir (b), and the air columns are neglected
against mercury, so the whole deflection is carried by the mercury:
$$\Delta P=\rho_{\text{Hg}}\,g\,h=(13\,550)(9.81)(0.150)=19\,939\ \text{Pa}=19.94\ \text{kPa}.$$
Add the head to the throat pressure. The throat of a choked nozzle is
the lowest-pressure station in the whole system, so mercury stands higher on the throat leg
and reservoir (b) is the higher pressure of the pair. Hence
$$\boxed{\;P_b=P_T+\Delta P=158.5+19.94=178.4\ \text{kPa}\;}$$
Note the estimate is insensitive to the shock: whatever happens downstream of the throat,
the throat pressure is fixed by $P_a$ alone once the nozzle is choked.
Part (b) — build the three limiting back pressures for the area ratio.
With $A_E/A_T=31.5/9=3.5$, the isentropic area relation
$$\frac{A}{A^{*}}=\frac{1}{M}\left[\frac{2}{\gamma+1}
\left(1+\frac{\gamma-1}{2}M^{2}\right)\right]^{(\gamma+1)/2(\gamma-1)}=3.5$$
has two roots, $M_E=0.1682$ on the subsonic branch and $M_E=2.800$ on the supersonic branch.
They generate the following limits, each an exit static pressure that must equal $P_b$ when
the corresponding regime is exactly realised.
Evaluate the limits. Wholly subsonic, just-choked operation gives
$P_b=P_a/(1+0.2M_E^{2})^{3.5}=300/1.0200=294.1$ kPa — the highest back pressure that
still chokes the throat. Perfect (design) expansion gives
$P_b=300/(1+0.2\times 2.800^{2})^{3.5}=11.06$ kPa. A normal shock standing exactly in the
exit plane raises the design pressure by the shock strength at $M_1=2.800$,
$$\frac{P_2}{P_1}=\frac{2\gamma M_1^{2}-(\gamma-1)}{\gamma+1}
=\frac{2(1.4)(7.84)-0.4}{2.4}=8.980,$$
so $P_b=11.06\times 8.980=99.27$ kPa. Since
$$99.27\ \text{kPa}<P_b=178.4\ \text{kPa}<294.1\ \text{kPa},$$
the operating point lies inside the shock band, and
$$\boxed{\;\text{yes — a normal shock stands in the flow}\;}$$
The same inequality confirms the step-1 assumption, because $P_b$ is well below the
294.1 kPa first-choking limit.
Part (c) — decide between the exit plane and a station upstream of it.
The exit-plane shock is the strongest shock the nozzle can hold and therefore
corresponds to the lowest back pressure of the band, 99.27 kPa. Raising the back
pressure above that value pushes the shock upstream into a region of smaller area and lower
upstream Mach number, where the shock is weaker. Here $P_b=178.4$ kPa is nearly twice the
exit-plane value, so
$$\boxed{\;\text{the shock stands farther upstream, inside the divergent section}\;}$$
Locate the shock station. Let the shock sit where the area is $A_s$.
The pre-shock Mach number follows from $A_s/A_T$ on the supersonic branch, the post-shock
Mach number from
$$M_2^{2}=\frac{M_1^{2}+\dfrac{2}{\gamma-1}}{\dfrac{2\gamma}{\gamma-1}M_1^{2}-1},$$
the stagnation-pressure loss from the Rayleigh–Pitot form of $P_{02}/P_{01}$, and a
new sonic area $A^{*}_2=A_s/(A/A^{*})_{M_2}$ carries the subsonic flow to the exit. Matching
the exit static pressure to 178.4 kPa gives
$$\frac{A_s}{A_T}=2.01,\qquad M_1=2.202,\qquad M_2=0.5467,\qquad M_E=0.2759 .$$
The shock therefore stands where the nozzle has opened to about twice the throat area,
roughly midway along the divergent section, with a stagnation-pressure loss of about 6 per
cent. This is more than part (c) demands but it is the quantitative statement of the
answer.
Part (d) — re-read the manometer for ideal expansion. At design
conditions the shock disappears, the exit Mach number is 2.800 throughout and the exit
static pressure equals the back-reservoir pressure, $P_b=11.06$ kPa. The throat is still
choked, so $P_T=158.5$ kPa is unchanged and the manometer now spans a far larger difference:
$$h=\frac{P_T-P_b}{\rho_{\text{Hg}}\,g}=\frac{(158\,485-11\,055)\ \text{Pa}}{(13\,550)(9.81)}
=1.109\ \text{m}$$
$$\boxed{\;h=1.109\ \text{m}=110.9\ \text{cm of mercury}\;}$$
and it now deflects the other way, with mercury standing higher on the reservoir-(b) leg,
because the back reservoir has become the low-pressure side. The mass flow is unaffected by
any of this — the choked throat passes
$\dot m=\rho^{*}A_T a^{*}=0.565$ kg/s in every case considered.
Quantity
Result
Critical pressure ratio, $P_0/P^{*}$
1.8929
Throat static pressure, $P_T$
158.5 kPa
Manometer pressure difference, $\rho gh$
19.94 kPa
(a) Downstream reservoir pressure, $P_b$
178.4 kPa
Area ratio and its two exit Mach roots
$A_E/A_T=3.5$; $M_E=0.1682$ or 2.800
First-choking back pressure
294.1 kPa
Shock-at-exit back pressure
99.27 kPa
Design (perfect-expansion) exit pressure
11.06 kPa
(b) Normal shock present?
Yes — 99.27 < 178.4 < 294.1 kPa
(c) Shock location
Upstream of the exit, at $A_s/A_T\approx2.01$ ($M_1=2.20$)
(d) Manometer reading at design expansion
110.9 cm of mercury (reversed)
Choked mass flow (all cases)
0.565 kg/s
Check: the printed paper gives the areas as
“9 cm³” and “31.5 cm³”; they are plainly areas and are read
here as cm², which is the only reading consistent with the words throat area
and exit area. The manometer polarity is not drawn unambiguously in Figure 1, so it
is fixed by physics rather than by the sketch: a choked throat is the lowest-pressure station
in the system, so reservoir (b) must be the higher pressure in parts (a)–(c) and the
lower pressure in part (d).