Question 2 of 8: Identifying a polymer from its molecular weight and degree of polymerization
Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)
Notes on this paper
Paper format. National Exams, December 2013 — 07-Mec-B8 Engineering Materials. Three hours, open book; any non-communicating calculator permitted. Eight questions, all of equal value; any FIVE constitute a complete paper, so each question is worth 20 marks. Candidates are urged to state any assumptions made. All eight questions are solved below, because the set as a whole is the study resource.
Given. A single unknown polymer whose two measured chain statistics are to be matched against two candidate chemistries:
Given data
Quantity
Symbol
Value
Average molecular weight
Mn
6250 g/mol
Degree of polymerization
DP
100
Atomic weight of hydrogen
AH
1.01 amu
Atomic weight of carbon
AC
12.01 amu
Atomic weight of chlorine
ACl
35.45 amu
Find. Which of the two candidate polymers, polyvinyl chloride or polypropylene, is consistent with the measured pair of values.
The measurement fixes one number — the mass of a single repeat unit — and only one of the two candidate chemistries can supply it.
Approach. The degree of polymerization is by definition the number of repeat units in an average chain, so dividing the average molecular weight by it returns the molar mass of one repeat unit; that single number is then compared with the repeat-unit formula weights of the two candidates.
Recover the repeat-unit molar mass from the definition of DP. The number-average molecular weight of a chain is the mass of its repeat unit multiplied by the number of repeat units it contains, $$M_n = \mathrm{DP}\times m_{\text{repeat}} \quad\Rightarrow\quad m_{\text{repeat}} = \frac{M_n}{\mathrm{DP}} = \frac{6250}{100}$$ $$\boxed{\ m_{\text{repeat}} = 62.50\ \text{g/mol}\ }$$Everything else in this question is arithmetic on the periodic table; this is the only measurement-derived quantity, and it is what the two candidates must be tested against.
Build the repeat unit of polyvinyl chloride. PVC polymerises from vinyl chloride, so its repeat unit is –CH2–CHCl–, that is C2H3Cl. Summing the atomic weights supplied by the question, $$m_{\text{PVC}} = 2A_C + 3A_H + A_{Cl} = 2(12.01) + 3(1.01) + 35.45 = 24.02 + 3.03 + 35.45 = 62.50\ \text{g/mol}$$ which is exactly the value recovered in Step 1.
Build the repeat unit of polypropylene. PP polymerises from propylene, so its repeat unit is –CH2–CH(CH3)–, that is C3H6. Note that it contains no chlorine at all, which is why the question bothers to supply ACl: $$m_{\text{PP}} = 3A_C + 6A_H = 3(12.01) + 6(1.01) = 36.03 + 6.06 = 42.09\ \text{g/mol}$$
Compare and decide. The measured 62.50 g/mol agrees with PVC to the last digit and is 48.5 % heavier than a propylene repeat unit, a discrepancy far outside any measurement uncertainty. $$\boxed{\ \text{The polymer is polyvinyl chloride (PVC)}\ }$$
Cross-check the rejected candidate on its own terms. If the material really were polypropylene, a chain of molecular weight 6250 would have to contain $$\mathrm{DP}_{\text{PP}} = \frac{6250}{42.09} = 148.5\ \text{repeat units}$$ not the 100 that was measured. The two measurements are therefore mutually inconsistent for PP and mutually consistent for PVC, which is a stronger statement than matching one number alone.
Suggest an independent confirmation. Chlorine accounts for $$\frac{A_{Cl}}{m_{\text{PVC}}}\times 100 = \frac{35.45}{62.50}\times 100 = 56.72\ \%$$ of the mass of PVC and none of the mass of PP, so a simple elemental chlorine assay, or a Beilstein flame test, settles the identification without any molecular-weight measurement at all.
Results for the polymer identification
Quantity
Symbol
Value
Measured repeat-unit molar mass
Mn/DP
62.50 g/mol
Repeat unit of PVC, C2H3Cl
mPVC
62.50 g/mol
Repeat unit of PP, C3H6
mPP
42.09 g/mol
DP the chain would need if it were PP
DPPP
148.5 (measured: 100)
Identification
—
Polyvinyl chloride
Chlorine content of PVC (confirmatory assay)
wCl
56.72 wt %
Check: the calculation assumes the quoted 6250 is a number-average molecular weight and that chain-end groups are negligible, which is safe at DP = 100 — two end groups add of the order of 30 g/mol, about 0.5 %, to a 6250 g/mol chain. Had the figure been a weight-average molecular weight, dividing by DP would not return the repeat-unit mass, because Mw/Mn for a commercial polymer is typically 1.5–3.