NivaarExam PrepOfficial exam papers ↗

22-Mec-B9 Advanced Engineering Structures · May 2018

Question 2 of 8: Crack growth life and the inspection interval

Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)

Notes on this paper

Paper format. National Exams, May 2018 — 16-Mec-B9 Advanced Engineering Structures. Three hours, open book, any non-communicating calculator permitted. Eight questions are printed, each worth 20 marks, and the rubric states that any five constitute a complete exam paper. All eight are worked here. Marks for the individual parts are those printed inside each problem.

Reference texts. T. H. G. Megson, Aircraft Structures for Engineering Students, 6th ed. (thin-walled open and closed sections, shear flow, shear centre, multi-cell torsion, crack growth and Miner cumulative damage); A. P. Boresi and R. J. Schmidt, Advanced Mechanics of Materials, 6th ed. (yield criteria, unsymmetrical bending, torsion of non-circular sections, shear centre); N. E. Dowling, Mechanical Behavior of Materials, 4th ed. (Paris law, Coffin–Manson, Palmgren–Miner); R. C. Hibbeler, Mechanics of Materials, 10th ed. (statically indeterminate axial members, thermal stress).

Check: the modulus printed for rod (2) in Question 1. The paper prints E2 = 95,000 GPa. No solid has a Young’s modulus of that order — diamond, the stiffest bulk material known, reaches about 1,200 GPa — so the value as printed is not physically realisable and is almost certainly a units slip for 95,000 MPa = 95 GPa, a figure entirely typical of an aluminium alloy and consistent with the way E1 = 150 GPa is written on the same line. Question 1 is therefore worked at E2 = 95 GPa, and the answers obtained by taking the printed number literally are carried alongside in the results table, because the two readings give opposite answers to part (b). Under the paper’s own instruction 1, a candidate should record this assumption with the answer script.

Question 2: Crack growth life and the inspection interval (20 marks)

Question text not reproduced: the examination questions are © Engineers and Geoscientists BC. Open the official past paper (linked at the top of this page) to read the question, then follow the worked solution below.

Given. A wing skin panel is modelled as a semi-infinite plate carrying an edge crack.

QuantityValue
Initial edge-crack length a00.55 mm
Constant-amplitude stress range Δσ normal to the crack200 N/mm²
Fracture toughness KIC2700 N/mm3/2
Growth law da/dN31 × 10−15(ΔK)4 mm/cycle
Edge-crack geometry factor β1.12 (assumed)

Find. The number of service cycles — the maintenance interval — in which the crack grows from 0.55 mm to half the critical length that would cause fast fracture.

Approach. Fix the critical crack length from \(K_{IC}\), halve it to get the inspection length, then integrate the Paris law between the two lengths; with \(m = 4\) the integral is elementary.

  1. Stress-intensity range for an edge crack. For a crack of length a at the edge of a semi-infinite plate, $$\Delta K = \beta\,\Delta\sigma\sqrt{\pi a}, \qquad \beta = 1.12$$ At the starting size, \(\Delta K = 1.12(200)\sqrt{\pi(0.55)} = 294\ \text{N/mm}^{3/2}\), giving an initial growth rate of only \(2.3\times10^{-4}\) mm/cycle.
  2. Critical crack length. Fast fracture occurs when \(\Delta K\) reaches the toughness, so setting \(\beta\,\Delta\sigma\sqrt{\pi a_c} = K_{IC}\), $$a_c = \frac{1}{\pi}\left(\frac{K_{IC}}{\beta\,\Delta\sigma}\right)^2 = \frac{1}{\pi}\left(\frac{2700}{1.12\times200}\right)^2 = \boxed{46.2\ \text{mm}}$$
  3. Detection length. The inspection must catch the crack before it reaches half of that: $$a_f = \tfrac{1}{2}a_c = 23.1\ \text{mm}$$
  4. Integrate the Paris law. Substituting \(\Delta K\) into \(\mathrm{d}a/\mathrm{d}N = C(\Delta K)^4\) and separating variables, $$N = \int_{a_0}^{a_f}\frac{\mathrm{d}a}{C\left(\beta\Delta\sigma\right)^4\pi^2 a^2} = \frac{1}{C'}\left(\frac{1}{a_0}-\frac{1}{a_f}\right), \qquad C' = C(\beta\Delta\sigma)^4\pi^2$$ The exponent \(m = 4\) is what makes the integrand \(a^{-2}\) and the integral closed-form.
  5. Evaluate the lumped constant. $$C' = (31\times10^{-15})(1.12\times200)^4\pi^2 = 7.703\times10^{-4}\ \text{mm}^{-1}\text{/cycle}$$
  6. Maintenance interval. $$N = \frac{1}{7.703\times10^{-4}}\left(\frac{1}{0.55}-\frac{1}{23.1}\right) = 1298\,(1.8182-0.0432) = \boxed{2304\ \text{cycles}}$$
a_c = 46.2 mm (fast fracture)a_f = 23.1 mmN = 2304 cycles0a (mm)cycles Na₀ = 0.55 mm
Question 2 — crack length against cycles from the integrated Paris law. Almost all of the life is spent while the crack is small; once it passes the inspection length the remaining life collapses.

The shape of that curve is the whole engineering point. Of the 2332 cycles available before fast fracture, 2304 are spent getting from 0.55 mm to 23.1 mm and only about 28 more are needed to run from 23.1 mm to the critical 46.2 mm. An inspection interval set at the full critical length would therefore be worthless: the "safety margin" would be one per cent of the life. Halving the critical length before setting the interval, as the question requires, is the standard damage-tolerance device for buying back that margin.

QuantityValue
Initial stress-intensity range ΔK294 N/mm3/2
Critical crack length ac46.2 mm
Crack length to be detected af23.1 mm
Lumped Paris constant C′7.703 × 10−4 mm−1/cycle
Maintenance interval2304 cycles
Cycles remaining from af to ac28 cycles