24-MMP-B4 Mine Ventilation and Occupational Hygiene · May 2013
Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)
National Exams (BC), 09-MMP-B4 Occupational Health, Safety and Loss Management (Mine Ventilation and Occupational Hygiene), May 2013, 3 hours, open book with calculator permitted. Answer any five of the six questions; every question (1-6) is answered in full as a complete study resource.
Reference texts: Crowl & Louvar, Chemical Process Safety: Fundamentals with Applications, 4th ed.; ACGIH, TLVs and BEIs and Industrial Ventilation: A Manual of Recommended Practice; OSHA 29 CFR 1904 Recordkeeping; WorkSafeBC/BC Health, Safety and Reclamation Code for Mines.
Question text not reproduced: the examination questions are © Engineers and Geoscientists BC. Open the official past paper (linked at the top of this page) to read the question, then follow the worked solution below.
Part (a) —
Given. Tank volume $V=1000\ \text{ft}^3$; initial O2 = 21% by volume; N2 purge gas added at the tank's own conditions (77°F, 1 atm), well mixed, with the tank vented so total pressure stays at 1 atm as gas is added.
Find. Volume of additional N2 needed to bring the O2 concentration down to (i) 19.5% and (ii) 16%.
Approach. For a well-mixed vessel purged by adding inert gas while venting to hold total pressure constant, the oxygen mole fraction decays exponentially with the volume of purge gas added (a standard inerting/purging result — each increment of added N2 displaces the same fraction of whatever gas is currently in the tank, including the N2 just added): $$\frac{y_{O_2}}{y_{O_2,0}}=\exp\!\left(-\frac{V_{N_2}}{V_{tank}}\right)$$
| Target O₂ | Additional N₂ required |
|---|---|
| 19.5% (respirator-without-SCBA threshold) | 74.1 ft³ |
| 16% (distress threshold) | 271.9 ft³ |
Because the mole-fraction decay is exponential, roughly 3.7× more N₂ is needed to push the concentration all the way down to the 16% distress threshold than to the 19.5% no-SCBA threshold — the last few percentage points of oxygen are the most expensive to remove, which is also why an atmosphere can look "almost normal" by smell/feel while already being dangerously oxygen-deficient.
Part (b) —
Given. Ammonia stored at $P_g=2000$ psig, $T=80\ ^\circ\text{F}$; crack diameter $d=0.1$ in; discharge to atmosphere ($P_{atm}=14.7$ psia).
Find. The mass flow rate through the crack.
Approach. Ammonia's saturation (vapour) pressure at 80°F is only about 154 psig, far below the stated 2000 psig storage pressure, and 2000 psig (2014.7 psia) exceeds ammonia's own critical pressure (1657 psia) while the storage temperature (80°F) is far below its critical temperature (270°F) — so the material inside the vessel is a single-phase, compressed (sub-cooled) liquid, not a saturated vapour/liquid mixture. The crack is therefore modelled with the standard liquid-discharge-through-a-hole source model, not a choked-gas-flow model: $$\dot m=C_o\,A\,\sqrt{2\,g_c\,\rho_L\,(P_g-P_{atm,g})}$$ with a sharp-edged-orifice discharge coefficient $C_o\approx0.61$ and liquid ammonia density at 80°F, $\rho_L\approx37.5\ \text{lb}_m/\text{ft}^3$.
| Quantity | Value |
|---|---|
| Crack area | 0.0079 in² |
| Mass flow rate | 0.877 lbm/s (52.6 lbm/min, 0.398 kg/s) |
A sub-millimetre crack at this driving pressure is enough to discharge nearly 24 kilograms of ammonia per minute — the consequence-analysis distance in a full release scenario would then follow from this steady mass release rate feeding a downwind dispersion calculation of exactly the type performed in Question 4.