24-MMP-B4 Mine Ventilation and Occupational Hygiene · May 2013
Question 4 of 6: Downwind Vapor Dispersion — ERPG-1 Evacuation Zone
Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)
Notes on this paper
National Exams (BC), 09-MMP-B4 Occupational Health, Safety and Loss Management
(Mine Ventilation and Occupational Hygiene), May 2013, 3 hours, open book with calculator
permitted. Answer any five of the six questions; every question (1-6)
is answered in full as a complete study resource.
Reference texts: Crowl & Louvar, Chemical Process Safety:
Fundamentals with Applications, 4th ed.; ACGIH, TLVs and BEIs and
Industrial Ventilation: A Manual of Recommended Practice; OSHA 29 CFR 1904
Recordkeeping; WorkSafeBC/BC Health, Safety and Reclamation Code for Mines.
Find. The ground area downwind where the vapour concentration
exceeds the ERPG-1 threshold.
Approach. Model the release as a continuous, ground-level Gaussian
plume (no elevation, no dense-gas correction as instructed). The threshold is already
given in mass-per-volume units, so the calculation stays entirely in mass units (no
molecular weight/ppm conversion is needed). Solve for the maximum downwind distance
$x_{max}$ at which the plume CENTRELINE concentration equals the threshold using the
stability-Class-F rural dispersion-coefficient correlations, then integrate the
crosswind isopleth width from the source out to $x_{max}$ to get the evacuation area.
Ground-level continuous-plume centreline concentration. For a
ground-level source (already includes the ground-reflection term), the downwind
centreline concentration is
$$C(x,0,0)=\frac{\dot Q}{\pi\,u\,\sigma_y(x)\,\sigma_z(x)}$$
with the Class-F rural Pasquill–Gifford correlations (Crowl & Louvar Table
5-2, $x$ in metres):
$$\sigma_y(x)=\frac{0.04x}{\sqrt{1+0.0001x}}\qquad\sigma_z(x)=\frac{0.016x}{\sqrt{1+0.0003x}}$$
Solve for the maximum downwind distance. $C(x,0,0)$ decreases
monotonically with $x$ once $\sigma_y\sigma_z$ grows faster than any near-field
peculiarity, so a numerical (bisection) solve of $C(x_{max},0,0)=C^*$ gives:
$$\sigma_y(x_{max})=86.4\ \text{m}\qquad\sigma_z(x_{max})=29.3\ \text{m}$$
$$\boxed{x_{max}\approx2405\ \text{m}\ (\approx2.41\ \text{km})}$$
Crosswind isopleth width and area. At any $x < x_{max}$ the plume
crosses the threshold at a crosswind offset
$$y_{1/2}(x)=\sigma_y(x)\sqrt{2\ln\!\left(\frac{C(x,0,0)}{C^*}\right)}$$
Numerically integrating the full isopleth width $2y_{1/2}(x)$ from the source out to
$x_{max}$ gives the evacuation footprint:
$$\boxed{A=\int_0^{x_{max}}2y_{1/2}(x)\,dx\approx255848\ \text{m}^2\ (\approx0.256\ \text{km}^2)}$$
with a maximum crosswind half-width of $72.0$ m (full width
$\approx144.0$ m) near the source.
Quantity
Value
Maximum downwind distance, $x_{max}$
2405 m (2.41 km)
Maximum crosswind width
144.0 m
Evacuation area (isopleth ≥ ERPG-1)
255848 m² (0.256 km², ≈ 25.6 ha)
The evacuation zone is a long, narrow lens stretching roughly 2.4 km downwind of the
release but only about 144 m across at its widest — a direct consequence of
Class-F "stable" conditions, which suppress vertical and lateral mixing far more than a
neutral or unstable atmosphere would, so the plume travels a long way before it dilutes
below the ERPG-1 threshold rather than spreading out and diluting quickly nearby.
Check: uses the Crowl & Louvar Table 5-2 rural Class-F
correlations for $\sigma_y,\sigma_z$ — a different published correlation set
(e.g. Pasquill's original curves, or urban rather than rural coefficients) would shift
$x_{max}$ and the area by up to a factor of 2, which is the dominant source of
uncertainty in any plume dispersion estimate; the "ignore dense-gas effects" instruction
in the question is taken at face value even though a boiling solvent pool commonly
produces an initially denser-than-air, ground-hugging plume in reality.