24-MMP-B4 Mine Ventilation and Occupational Hygiene · May 2014
Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)
National Exams (BC), 09-MMP-B4 Occupational Health, Safety and Loss Management (Mine Ventilation and Occupational Hygiene), May 2014, 3 hours, open book with calculator permitted. Answer any five of the six questions; every question (1-6) is answered in full as a complete study resource.
Reference texts: Crowl & Louvar, Chemical Process Safety: Fundamentals with Applications, 4th ed.; ACGIH, TLVs and BEIs and Industrial Ventilation: A Manual of Recommended Practice; OSHA 29 CFR 1904 Recordkeeping; WorkSafeBC/BC Health, Safety and Reclamation Code for Mines.
Question text not reproduced: the examination questions are © Engineers and Geoscientists BC. Open the official past paper (linked at the top of this page) to read the question, then follow the worked solution below.
Given. Tank volume $V=1000\ \text{ft}^3$; initial O2 = 21% by volume; N2 purge gas added at the tank's own conditions (77°F, 1 atm), well mixed, with the tank vented so total pressure stays at 1 atm as gas is added.
Find. Volume of additional N2 needed to bring the O2 concentration down to (i) 19.5% and (ii) 16%.
Approach. For a well-mixed vessel purged by adding inert gas while venting to hold total pressure constant, the oxygen mole fraction decays exponentially with the volume of purge gas added — each increment of added N2 displaces the same fraction of whatever gas is currently in the tank, including the N2 just added: $$\frac{y_{O_2}}{y_{O_2,0}}=\exp\!\left(-\frac{V_{N_2}}{V_{tank}}\right)$$
| Target O₂ | Additional N₂ required |
|---|---|
| 19.5% (respirator-without-SCBA threshold) | 74.1 ft³ |
| 16% (distress threshold) | 271.9 ft³ |
Because the mole-fraction decay is exponential, roughly 3.7× more N₂ is needed to push the concentration all the way down to the 16% distress threshold than to the 19.5% no-SCBA threshold — the last few percentage points of oxygen are the most expensive to remove, which is also why an atmosphere can look "almost normal" by smell/feel while already being dangerously oxygen-deficient.
Given. Ammonia stored at $P_g=2000$ psig, $T=80\ ^\circ\text{F}$; crack diameter $d=0.1$ in; discharge to atmosphere ($P_{atm}=14.7$ psia).
Find. The mass flow rate through the crack.
Approach. Ammonia's saturation (vapour) pressure at 80°F is only about 153 psig (167.7 psia), far below the stated 2000 psig storage pressure, and 2000 psig (2014.7 psia) exceeds ammonia's own critical pressure (1657 psia) while the storage temperature (80°F) is far below its critical temperature (270°F) — so the material inside the vessel is a single-phase, compressed (sub-cooled) liquid, not a saturated vapour/liquid mixture. The crack is therefore modelled with the standard liquid-discharge-through-a-hole source model, not a choked-gas-flow model: $$\dot m=C_o\,A\,\sqrt{2\,g_c\,\rho_L\,(P_g-P_{atm,g})}$$ with a sharp-edged-orifice discharge coefficient $C_o\approx0.61$ and liquid ammonia density at 80°F, $\rho_L\approx37.5\ \text{lb}_m/\text{ft}^3$.
| Quantity | Value |
|---|---|
| Crack area | 0.0079 in² |
| Mass flow rate | 0.877 lbm/s (52.6 lbm/min, 0.398 kg/s) |
A sub-millimetre crack at this driving pressure is enough to discharge nearly 24 kilograms of ammonia per minute — a release rate that would immediately warrant a downwind dispersion assessment of exactly the type performed in Question 4.