25-Nav-A2 Hydrodynamics of Ships (I)_ Resistance and Propulsion · December 2017
Question 3 of 5: Inclining Experiment & Ship's KG
Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)
Notes on this paper
National Examinations, Dec 2017 — 98-Mar-A2 Fundamentals of Naval Architecture, 3 hours, open book (any non-communicating calculator permitted). Five questions constitute a complete exam paper and each is of equal value.
Reference texts: Tupper, Introduction to Naval Architecture; Lewis (ed.), Principles of Naval Architecture (PNA); IMO, International Code on Intact Stability (IS Code).
Check: this paper, although listed under Hydrodynamics of Ships (I): Resistance and Propulsion, is headed "98-Mar-A2, Fundamentals of Naval Architecture" and its five questions are entirely barge/ship stability and hydrostatics (freeboard, trim, inclining experiment, flooding, GZ curve) with no resistance or propulsion content whatsoever. Solved here as the exam that was actually printed.
Question 3: Inclining Experiment & Ship's KG (20 marks)
Given. Displacement (with inclining weights aboard) $\Delta=3400$ LT, $KM=26.5$ ft, and the five (moment, list-angle) readings above; the 28 LT inclining weight is moved horizontally between readings, with its own centre of gravity at 43 ft above the keel.
Find. The ship's $KG$ at this condition.
Heeling moment vs. corrected list angle, with the through-origin least-squares fit used for GM.
Approach. An inclining experiment satisfies $M=\Delta\,GM\tan\theta$ for small angles; zero-correct the readings against the residual list recorded at zero applied moment, fit a straight line through the origin to the corrected data (the "plot" the question asks for), read off the slope $\Delta\,GM$, then take $KG=KM-GM$.
Zero-correct the list readings. At zero applied moment the ship already lists 0.2° to port — a small pre-existing asymmetry (off-centre stores, minor list) that must be removed before fitting a line through the origin. Taking starboard positive, subtract this $-0.2^\circ$ baseline from every reading:
Moment (ft·LT)
Raw angle
Corrected angle
+880
+2.3°
+2.5°
+528
+1.2°
+1.4°
0
−0.2°
0.0°
−528
−1.5°
−1.3°
−528
−2.3°
−2.1°
Best-fit slope through the origin. With $\tan\theta_i$ computed from the corrected angles, a least-squares fit of $M=k\tan\theta$ forced through the origin gives $$k=\dfrac{\sum M_i\tan\theta_i}{\sum \tan^2\theta_i}=18{,}947\ \text{ft}\cdot\text{LT}$$ (this is the slope plotted in the figure above; the scatter about it is normal experimental noise across five readings).
GM and KG as tested. Since $k=\Delta\,GM$, $$GM=\dfrac{k}{\Delta}=\dfrac{18{,}947}{3400}=5.57\ \text{ft}$$ and therefore $$\boxed{KG_{tested}=KM-GM=26.5-5.57=20.93\ \text{ft}}$$
Correction for the inclining gear. The stated displacement $\Delta=3400$ LT is the ship with the 28 LT inclining weight aboard. Because that weight starts the experiment centred on the ship's centreline (the zero-moment reading above is exactly the pre-existing list, not a shift caused by the gear), it contributes no net heeling moment before the test and its vertical position (43 ft) is already folded into the 3400 LT, $KG_{tested}=20.93$ ft figure computed above — there is no separate "as-inclined" displacement quoted to correct against. $KG_{tested}=20.93$ ft is therefore reported directly as the ship's $KG$ in this condition.
Check: no separate "before test" displacement is given for the 28 LT gear, so it is treated as already included (centred, zero net moment) in the quoted $\Delta=3400$ LT — the standard "remove the inclining weights" correction has no additional figures to act on here.