25-Nav-A2 Hydrodynamics of Ships (I)_ Resistance and Propulsion · December 2017
Question 4 of 5: Trim After Flooding a Stern-End Compartment
Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)
Notes on this paper
National Examinations, Dec 2017 — 98-Mar-A2 Fundamentals of Naval Architecture, 3 hours, open book (any non-communicating calculator permitted). Five questions constitute a complete exam paper and each is of equal value.
Reference texts: Tupper, Introduction to Naval Architecture; Lewis (ed.), Principles of Naval Architecture (PNA); IMO, International Code on Intact Stability (IS Code).
Check: this paper, although listed under Hydrodynamics of Ships (I): Resistance and Propulsion, is headed "98-Mar-A2, Fundamentals of Naval Architecture" and its five questions are entirely barge/ship stability and hydrostatics (freeboard, trim, inclining experiment, flooding, GZ curve) with no resistance or propulsion content whatsoever. Solved here as the exam that was actually printed.
Question 4: Trim After Flooding a Stern-End Compartment (20 marks)
Given. Barge as in Q1 ($L=70$ m, $B=17$ m), floating at $d_0=4$ m with $KG=2.5$ m. A full-width, empty stern-end compartment of length $\ell=8$ m, permeability $\mu=0.85$, is opened to the sea. $\rho=1.025\ \text{t/m}^3$.
Find. The new forward and aft drafts.
Resulting waterline (exaggerated trim) after the stern compartment floods; F marks the shifted centre of flotation.
Approach. Use the lost-buoyancy method: the flooded compartment (weighted by its permeability) can no longer contribute buoyant waterplane area, so the ship behaves as though it were shorter by $\mu\ell$ — it must sink bodily until the reduced hull displaces the same (unchanged) volume, and its centre of flotation shifts away from the flooded end, producing a trimming moment about the new F.
Bodily rise (parallel sinkage). The buoyancy lost in the compartment at the original draft is $v=\mu\ell B d_0=0.85\times8\times17\times4=462.4\ \text{m}^3$, over an "excluded" waterplane area $a=\mu\ell B=0.85\times8\times17=115.6\ \text{m}^2$. The remaining (intact) waterplane, $A_W-a=1190-115.6=1074.4\ \text{m}^2$, must rise enough to replace that lost volume: $$\delta=\dfrac{v}{A_W-a}=\dfrac{462.4}{1074.4}=0.430\ \text{m}\ \Rightarrow\ d_F=d_0+\delta=4.430\ \text{m (draft at the new F)}$$
New centre of flotation. Taking moments of area about the original midships (positive forward), the compartment's centroid is $x_c=8/2-70/2=-31\ \text{m}$ (31 m aft of midships). Removing area $a$ at $x_c$ from the original waterplane (centroid at $0$) shifts F to $$x_F=\dfrac{-a\,x_c}{A_W-a}=\dfrac{-115.6\times(-31)}{1074.4}=3.34\ \text{m forward of midships}$$ — F moves away from the flooded end, as expected.
Trimming moment. The lost buoyancy is a mass-equivalent of $v\rho=462.4\times1.025=474.0\ \text{t}$, acting effectively through the flooded compartment's centroid while the compensating buoyancy is generated through the new F, a lever arm of $x_F-x_c=3.34-(-31)=34.34\ \text{m}$ away: $$M_{trim}=474.0\times34.34=16{,}274\ \text{t}\cdot\text{m}$$
MCT1cm at the new mean draft and change of trim. Displacement is unchanged by flooding ($\Delta=\rho A_W d_0=4879.0\ \text{t}$, weight neither added nor removed — the sea simply fills a hole). Using the new draft, $BM_L=L^2/(12d_F)=4900/(12\times4.430)=92.17\ \text{m}$, so $$MCT1cm=\dfrac{\Delta\,BM_L}{100L}=\dfrac{4879.0\times92.17}{7000}=64.24\ \text{t}\cdot\text{m/cm}$$ Change of trim: $t=M_{trim}/MCT1cm=16{,}274/64.24=253.3\ \text{cm}=2.533\ \text{m}$, by the stern (the flooded end sinks deeper).
New forward and aft drafts. Splitting the trim about the new F (at $3.34$ m forward of midships, i.e. $38.34$ m from AP and $31.66$ m from FP): $$d_{AP}=d_F+t\times\dfrac{38.34}{70}=4.430+2.533\times0.5477=5.82\ \text{m}$$ $$\boxed{d_{FP}=d_F-t\times\dfrac{31.66}{70}=4.430-2.533\times0.4523=3.28\ \text{m}}$$ $$\boxed{d_{AP}=5.82\ \text{m}}$$ Both remain below the 7.5 m depth, so the barge does not submerge its deck at either end.