25-Nav-A2 Hydrodynamics of Ships (I)_ Resistance and Propulsion · December 2019
Question 5 of 9: Preliminary Propeller Design for a Coastal Tanker
Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)
Notes on this paper
National Exams — December 2019 — 16-Nav-A2 Hydrodynamics of Ships I: Resistance and Propulsion. Three-hour, closed-book exam; a data sheet, a propeller (Wageningen B4-55) chart and a Burrill cavitation chart are supplied. Format: Questions 1–7 are compulsory (attempt all seven), then one of Questions 8 or 9. All nine are solved below for completeness. Units follow the paper (mixed SI, with the historic Imperial-unit legend that duplicates on the supplied Burrill sheet noted where relevant).
Reference texts: Larsson & Raven, Ship Resistance and Flow (SNAME) — model-scale resistance testing, Froude/Reynolds scaling and the ITTC 1978 performance-prediction method; Lewis (ed.), Principles of Naval Architecture, Vol. II — Resistance, Propulsion and Vibration (SNAME) — propeller geometry, open-water B-series design and cavitation; Carlton, Marine Propellers and Propulsion (Butterworth-Heinemann) — Wageningen B-series charts and the Burrill back-cavitation criterion.
Question 5: Preliminary Propeller Design for a Coastal Tanker (15 marks)
Given. $V_S=12$ kn; MCR $=790$ kW, derating $=0.90$, service allowance $=0.15$; shaft efficiency $\eta_S=0.98$, transmission efficiency $\eta_M=0.97$; shaft speed $n=360$ rpm $=6.0$ rps; max. diameter $D=1.7$ m; shaft depth $h_0=2.40$ m; calm-water resistance with appendages $R=55.0$ kN at 12 kn; wake fraction $w=0.24$; sea water at 15 °C ($\rho=1025\ \text{kg/m}^3$). Propeller is a 4-bladed Wageningen B4-55 series ($Z=4$, $A_E/A_O=0.55$).
Quantity
Value
Ship speed $V_S$
12 kn = 6.173 m/s
MCR, derating, service allowance
790 kW, 0.90, 0.15
$\eta_S$, $\eta_M$
0.98, 0.97
Shaft speed $n$
360 rpm = 6.0 rps
Max. diameter $D$ / shaft depth $h_0$
1.7 m / 2.40 m
Resistance $R$ (12 kn, with appendages)
55.0 kN
Wake fraction $w$
0.24
Find. (i) pitch ratio $P/D$; (ii) thrust delivered; (iii) open-water efficiency $\eta_o$; (iv) propulsive efficiency $\eta_p$.
Approach. Work down the power train from the nameplate rating to the power actually delivered to the propeller; combine that with the fixed shaft speed and diameter to get the required torque coefficient; enter the B4-55 open-water chart at the resulting advance coefficient $J$ to select the pitch ratio whose $10K_Q$ curve matches, then read $K_T$ and $\eta_o$ from the same operating point. Because delivered power $P_D$ and effective power $P_E=RV_S$ are both known independently, the overall propulsive efficiency follows directly without needing the thrust-deduction fraction.
Figure 3 — Non-dimensional design point ($J=0.46$, required $10K_Q=0.298$) located on the supplied B4-55 open-water chart (page 9 of the exam); the $P/D\approx0.90$ curve family matches this torque loading, giving $K_T\approx0.224$ and $\eta_o\approx0.55$ at the same $J$.
Power actually available for the calm-water design condition. The 790 kW MCR already includes a 15% service allowance (reserve for fouling/weather) above the calm-water design point, and the engine is run continuously at 90% of MCR:
$$P_{B}=\frac{\text{MCR}\times\text{derating}}{1+\text{service allowance}}=\frac{790\times0.90}{1.15}=\boxed{618.3\ \text{kW}}.$$
Power delivered to the propeller. Passing through the shaft and transmission (gearbox) losses,
$$P_D=P_B\,\eta_S\,\eta_M=(618.3)(0.98)(0.97)=\boxed{587.7\ \text{kW}}.$$
Speed of advance and advance coefficient.
$$V_A=V_S(1-w)=(6.173)(0.76)=4.691\ \text{m/s},\qquad J=\frac{V_A}{nD}=\frac{4.691}{(6.0)(1.7)}=\boxed{0.460}.$$
Required torque and torque coefficient. From $P_D=2\pi nQ$,
$$Q=\frac{P_D}{2\pi n}=\frac{587{,}700}{2\pi(6.0)}=15{,}590\ \text{N}\cdot\text{m},\qquad K_{Q,\text{req}}=\frac{Q}{\rho n^2D^5}=\frac{15{,}590}{(1025)(6.0)^2(1.7)^5}=0.0298,$$
so $10K_{Q,\text{req}}=0.298$.
Select $P/D$ from the chart, read $K_T$ and $\eta_o$. On the B4-55 chart at $J=0.46$, the $10K_Q$ curve for $\boxed{P/D\approx0.90}$ passes through $10K_Q=0.298$ (part i); at the same point, $K_T\approx0.224$ and $\eta_o\approx0.55$. (Chart values are read to the precision the supplied sheet allows; a full-size printed chart would tighten these to about $\pm0.01$.)
Thrust delivered.
$$T=K_T\,\rho\,n^2D^4=(0.224)(1025)(6.0)^2(1.7)^4=\boxed{68.9\ \text{kN}}.$$
As a consistency check, $R=T(1-t)$ gives an implied thrust-deduction fraction $t=1-R/T=1-55.0/68.9\approx0.20$ — a thoroughly typical value for a single-screw merchant hull, supporting the chart reading. That is part (ii).
Open-water efficiency. Read directly from the chart at the same point (part iii):
$$\eta_o=\frac{K_TJ}{2\pi K_Q}\approx\boxed{0.55}.$$
Propulsive efficiency. With $P_E=RV_S$ and $P_D$ from Step 2, both already known independently of the chart,
$$P_E=RV_S=(55{,}000)(6.173)=339.5\ \text{kW},\qquad \eta_p=\eta_D=\frac{P_E}{P_D}=\frac{339.5}{587.7}=\boxed{0.578}.$$
That is part (iv).
Quantity
Result
Delivered power $P_D$
587.7 kW
Advance coefficient $J$
0.460
(i) Selected pitch ratio $P/D$
≈ 0.90
(ii) Thrust delivered $T$
≈ 68.9 kN
(iii) Open-water efficiency $\eta_o$
≈ 0.55
(iv) Propulsive efficiency $\eta_p=P_E/P_D$
0.578
Check
Parts (i)–(iii) require reading $K_T$, $10K_Q$ and $\eta_o$ off the supplied Wageningen B4-55 open-water chart at $J=0.46$. The values above ($P/D\approx0.90$, $K_T\approx0.224$, $\eta_o\approx0.55$) are consistent with the required $10K_{Q}=0.298$ and are corroborated by the resulting implied thrust-deduction fraction $t\approx0.20$, which is realistic for this hull type.