NivaarExam PrepOfficial exam papers ↗

24-Pet-A1 Principles of Stratigraphy and Sedimentation · May 2013

Question 10 of 15: Subaqueous Bedforms – Grain Size and Flow Velocity

Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)

Notes on this paper

EGBC National Exam — Petroleum Engineering, 98-Pet-A1 Principles of Stratigraphy & Sedimentation, 2013-May. 3 hours duration; closed book, no calculator permitted. Candidates answer any 10 of the 15 questions (10 marks each, 100 marks total) and are asked to illustrate answers with drawings wherever possible.

Reference texts: Boggs, S. Jr., Principles of Sedimentology and Stratigraphy, 5th ed., Pearson (texture classification, evaporites, clay minerals, sediment gravity flows, storm/shelf processes, bedforms, stable isotopes, geological time scale); Tucker, M.E., Sedimentary Petrology, 3rd ed., Blackwell (carbonate fabric, dolomitization, reef facies); Nichols, G., Sedimentology and Stratigraphy, 2nd ed., Wiley-Blackwell (depositional systems, transgression/regression, sequence stratigraphy); Reading, H.G. (ed.), Sedimentary Environments: Processes, Facies and Stratigraphy, 3rd ed., Blackwell (facies models); Selley, R.C. & Sonnenberg, S., Elements of Petroleum Geology, 3rd ed., Academic Press (source rock maturation, petroleum systems); International Commission on Stratigraphy, International Chronostratigraphic Chart (geological time scale).

Question 10: Subaqueous Bedforms – Grain Size and Flow Velocity (10 marks)

Question text not reproduced: the examination questions are © Engineers and Geoscientists BC. Open the official past paper (linked at the top of this page) to read the question, then follow the worked solution below.

For a given grain size, progressively increasing unidirectional flow velocity over a sandy bed produces an ordered succession of bedforms, summarized on a bedform-stability diagram (flow velocity on one axis, grain size on the other). The sequence reflects the changing balance between the boundary shear stress the flow exerts and the bed's resistance to erosion/transport, and each bedform leaves a diagnostic internal sedimentary structure once preserved.

Bedform stability: mean flow velocity vs. grain sizegrain size (fine → coarse)mean flow velocity →no movementcurrent ripples(fine sand only,<0.6 mm)dunes (lower flow regime)plane bed (upper flow regime)antidunesplane bed(lower FR,coarse sand)
Schematic bedform-stability diagram: with increasing flow velocity, a sandy bed passes through no-movement, current ripples, dunes, plane bed (upper flow regime), and antidunes; coarse sand can also show a separate lower-flow-regime plane-bed field at low velocity, before the ripple field is reached.
Bedform sequence with increasing velocity (lower flow regime → upper flow regime)
BedformFlow regimePreserved structure
No movement–Original bed structure preserved (no transport)
Current ripples (fine sand only, <≈0.6 mm)LowerRipple cross-lamination
Dunes (megaripples)LowerTrough/planar cross-bedding (the dune's foreset, at the scale of the whole bedform)
Plane bedUpper (also a separate lower-regime field for coarse sand at LOW velocity)Horizontal/planar lamination, often with parting lineation
AntidunesUpper (highest velocity)Low-angle, upstream-dipping backset lamination; rarely preserved because falling-stage erosion typically destroys it

Grain size shifts the whole diagram: coarse sand cannot form current ripples at all (ripples are restricted to sand finer than ≈0.6 mm) and instead passes directly from no-movement to a lower-flow-regime plane bed, then to dunes, at higher velocities than an equivalent fine sand needs to reach the same bedform – which is why the diagram must be read as a joint function of BOTH variables, not velocity alone.