24-Pet-A6 Well Logging and Formation Evaluation · May 2015
Question 2 of 8: Producing GOR and Gas-Injection Material Balance
Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)
Notes on this paper
98-Pet-A6 — Reservoir Mechanics · National Exams, May 2015 · 3 hours, closed book, Casio/Sharp approved calculator only · eight problems set (candidates answer Problems 1 and 2 plus any three of the remaining six per the exam's own instructions; all eight are solved in full below as a complete study resource), all questions equal value.
Reference texts: Craft, B.C. & Hawkins, M.F., Applied Petroleum Reservoir Engineering, 3rd ed. (material balance, decline curves, transient well testing, permeability averaging); Ahmed, T., Reservoir Engineering Handbook, 5th ed. (material balance, decline-curve analysis, pressure buildup, PVT correlations); Golan, M. & Whitson, C.H., Well Performance, 2nd ed. (reserves methods, water/gas influx); Lyons, W.C. (ed.), Standard Handbook of Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering, 3rd ed.
Check: this paper's own title page reads “98-PET-A6: Reservoir Mechanics”, not “Well Logging and Formation Evaluation” — the subject heading it is listed under does not match its content. Every problem below is answered as the paper actually printed it (material balance, decline-curve analysis, pressure-transient testing and permeability averaging — classic Reservoir Mechanics/Fundamental Reservoir Engineering topics), not well-logging.
Problem 2: Producing GOR and Gas-Injection Material Balance (15 marks)
Given. $N_p$ (0–7 MMstb) with its producing GOR $R_p$ (scf/stb) and cumulative injected gas $G_{inj}$ (MMscf, injection starts at $N_p=5$), tabulated above.
Find. Cumulative produced gas $G_p$, net cumulative produced gas ($G_p-G_{inj}$), and a single plot of $R_p$, $G_p$, $G_p-G_{inj}$ and $G_{inj}$, all vs. $N_p$.
Approach. $R_p$ is the instantaneous producing GOR at each $N_p$, so cumulative produced gas is its running integral, $G_p=\int R_p\,dN_p$, evaluated between table rows with the trapezoidal rule (average $R_p$ of the two endpoints times the $N_p$ increment); net produced gas simply removes whatever has been re-injected.
Cumulative produced gas (trapezoidal integration of $R_p$). Between consecutive rows, $\Delta G_p=\bar{R}_p\,\Delta N_p$ with $\bar{R}_p$ the average of the two endpoint GORs and $\Delta N_p=1$ MMstb throughout: e.g. $0\to1$: $\bar{R}_p=(300+280)/2=290$, $\Delta G_p=290$ MMscf; $4\to5$: $\bar{R}_p=(560+850)/2=705$, $\Delta G_p=705$ MMscf; and so on. Running the sum over all seven intervals gives $\boxed{G_p=0,\,290,\,570,\,880,\,1330,\,2035,\,3020,\,4290\text{ MMscf}}$ at $N_p=0,1,\dots,7$ MMstb respectively.
Net cumulative produced gas. $G_{p,\text{net}}=G_p-G_{inj}$. Injection is zero through $N_p=5$, so $G_{p,\text{net}}=G_p$ there; at $N_p=6$: $3020-520=2500$; at $N_p=7$: $4290-930=\boxed{3360\text{ MMscf}}$.
Fig. 1: Producing GOR and the three cumulative-gas curves vs. cumulative oil production (dual axis: GOR left, gas volumes right).