NivaarExam PrepOfficial exam papers ↗

24-Pet-A6 Well Logging and Formation Evaluation · May 2015

Question 3 of 8: Gas-Well Decline Curve — Type, Reserves and Economic Limit

Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)

Notes on this paper

98-Pet-A6 — Reservoir Mechanics · National Exams, May 2015 · 3 hours, closed book, Casio/Sharp approved calculator only · eight problems set (candidates answer Problems 1 and 2 plus any three of the remaining six per the exam's own instructions; all eight are solved in full below as a complete study resource), all questions equal value.

Reference texts: Craft, B.C. & Hawkins, M.F., Applied Petroleum Reservoir Engineering, 3rd ed. (material balance, decline curves, transient well testing, permeability averaging); Ahmed, T., Reservoir Engineering Handbook, 5th ed. (material balance, decline-curve analysis, pressure buildup, PVT correlations); Golan, M. & Whitson, C.H., Well Performance, 2nd ed. (reserves methods, water/gas influx); Lyons, W.C. (ed.), Standard Handbook of Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering, 3rd ed.

Check: this paper's own title page reads “98-PET-A6: Reservoir Mechanics”, not “Well Logging and Formation Evaluation” — the subject heading it is listed under does not match its content. Every problem below is answered as the paper actually printed it (material balance, decline-curve analysis, pressure-transient testing and permeability averaging — classic Reservoir Mechanics/Fundamental Reservoir Engineering topics), not well-logging.

Problem 3: Gas-Well Decline Curve — Type, Reserves and Economic Limit (20 marks)

Question text not reproduced: the examination questions are © Engineers and Geoscientists BC. Open the official past paper (linked at the top of this page) to read the question, then follow the worked solution below.

Given. Thirteen monthly rate readings from 1/1/02 ($q=1000$ MMscf/month) to 1/1/03 ($q=631$ MMscf/month); economic limit $q_a=25$ MMscf/month.

Find. (a) the decline type; (b) reserves from 1/1/03 to abandonment; (c) the calendar time abandonment is reached.

Approach. Fit $\ln q$ vs. $t$ (months) by least squares; a straight line (constant percentage decline) identifies exponential decline and gives $D$ directly, after which the exponential decline-curve formulas $N_p=(q_i-q_a)/D$ and $t_a=\ln(q_i/q_a)/D$ apply, restarting the clock at 1/1/03.

  1. (a) Decline type. Regressing $\ln q=\ln q_i-Dt$ on the 13 points gives $\ln q_i=6.9078$ ($q_i=1000.0$ MMscf/month, matching the first point exactly) and $\boxed{D=0.0383\text{/month}}$, with $R^2=0.9999$ — essentially a perfect straight line on the semilog plot (Fig. 1), so this is a constant-percentage exponential decline ($b=0$), not harmonic or hyperbolic.
  2. (b) Reserves to economic limit. Restarting the exponential formula at 1/1/03 with $q_i'=631$ MMscf/month and $q_a=25$ MMscf/month: $N_p=\dfrac{q_i'-q_a}{D}=\dfrac{631-25}{0.0383}$, so $\boxed{N_p\approx15{,}800\text{ MMscf}\ (15.8\text{ Bcf})}$.
  3. (c) Time to economic limit. $t_a=\dfrac{\ln(q_i'/q_a)}{D}=\dfrac{\ln(631/25)}{0.0383}=\dfrac{3.229}{0.0383}$, so $\boxed{t_a\approx84.2\text{ months}\approx7.0\text{ years after }1/1/03}$ — i.e. the well reaches the 25 MMscf/month limit around early 2010.
500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 Months since 1/1/02 Rate, MMscf/month (log scale) D = 0.0383 /month (R²=0.9999)
Fig. 2: log(rate) vs. time is a straight line ⇒ exponential decline. Fitted D = 0.0383/month.
QuantityValue
Decline typeExponential, $D=0.0383$/month ($R^2=0.9999$)
Reserves, 1/1/03 to economic limit$\approx15{,}800$ MMscf
Time to economic limit$\approx84.2$ months ($\approx7.0$ yr) after 1/1/03