24-Pet-A6 Well Logging and Formation Evaluation · May 2015
Question 3 of 8: Gas-Well Decline Curve — Type, Reserves and Economic Limit
Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)
Notes on this paper
98-Pet-A6 — Reservoir Mechanics · National Exams, May 2015 · 3 hours, closed book, Casio/Sharp approved calculator only · eight problems set (candidates answer Problems 1 and 2 plus any three of the remaining six per the exam's own instructions; all eight are solved in full below as a complete study resource), all questions equal value.
Reference texts: Craft, B.C. & Hawkins, M.F., Applied Petroleum Reservoir Engineering, 3rd ed. (material balance, decline curves, transient well testing, permeability averaging); Ahmed, T., Reservoir Engineering Handbook, 5th ed. (material balance, decline-curve analysis, pressure buildup, PVT correlations); Golan, M. & Whitson, C.H., Well Performance, 2nd ed. (reserves methods, water/gas influx); Lyons, W.C. (ed.), Standard Handbook of Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering, 3rd ed.
Check: this paper's own title page reads “98-PET-A6: Reservoir Mechanics”, not “Well Logging and Formation Evaluation” — the subject heading it is listed under does not match its content. Every problem below is answered as the paper actually printed it (material balance, decline-curve analysis, pressure-transient testing and permeability averaging — classic Reservoir Mechanics/Fundamental Reservoir Engineering topics), not well-logging.
Problem 3: Gas-Well Decline Curve — Type, Reserves and Economic Limit (20 marks)
Given. Thirteen monthly rate readings from 1/1/02 ($q=1000$ MMscf/month) to 1/1/03 ($q=631$ MMscf/month); economic limit $q_a=25$ MMscf/month.
Find. (a) the decline type; (b) reserves from 1/1/03 to abandonment; (c) the calendar time abandonment is reached.
Approach. Fit $\ln q$ vs. $t$ (months) by least squares; a straight line (constant percentage decline) identifies exponential decline and gives $D$ directly, after which the exponential decline-curve formulas $N_p=(q_i-q_a)/D$ and $t_a=\ln(q_i/q_a)/D$ apply, restarting the clock at 1/1/03.
(a) Decline type. Regressing $\ln q=\ln q_i-Dt$ on the 13 points gives $\ln q_i=6.9078$ ($q_i=1000.0$ MMscf/month, matching the first point exactly) and $\boxed{D=0.0383\text{/month}}$, with $R^2=0.9999$ — essentially a perfect straight line on the semilog plot (Fig. 1), so this is a constant-percentage exponential decline ($b=0$), not harmonic or hyperbolic.
(b) Reserves to economic limit. Restarting the exponential formula at 1/1/03 with $q_i'=631$ MMscf/month and $q_a=25$ MMscf/month: $N_p=\dfrac{q_i'-q_a}{D}=\dfrac{631-25}{0.0383}$, so $\boxed{N_p\approx15{,}800\text{ MMscf}\ (15.8\text{ Bcf})}$.
(c) Time to economic limit. $t_a=\dfrac{\ln(q_i'/q_a)}{D}=\dfrac{\ln(631/25)}{0.0383}=\dfrac{3.229}{0.0383}$, so $\boxed{t_a\approx84.2\text{ months}\approx7.0\text{ years after }1/1/03}$ — i.e. the well reaches the 25 MMscf/month limit around early 2010.
Fig. 2: log(rate) vs. time is a straight line ⇒ exponential decline. Fitted D = 0.0383/month.
Quantity
Value
Decline type
Exponential, $D=0.0383$/month ($R^2=0.9999$)
Reserves, 1/1/03 to economic limit
$\approx15{,}800$ MMscf
Time to economic limit
$\approx84.2$ months ($\approx7.0$ yr) after 1/1/03