Question 7 of 10: Neutron-Density Porosity and Sxo in a Gas Sand
Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)
Notes on this paper
National Examinations, 17-Pet-B1, Well Logging and Formation Evaluation — December 2019, 3 hours, closed book (Casio or Sharp approved calculators permitted), 10 questions, all marked.
Reference texts: Bassiouni, Theory, Measurement, and Interpretation of Well Logs (SPE Textbook Series Vol. 4); Asquith & Krygowski, Basic Well Log Analysis, 2nd ed. (AAPG); Ellis & Singer, Well Logging for Earth Scientists, 2nd ed.; Schlumberger, Log Interpretation Charts / Log Interpretation Principles and Applications.
Question 7: Neutron-Density Porosity and Sxo in a Gas Sand (15 marks)
2.65 g/cm³ (printed on the attachment chart, source p.13)
Mud-filtrate density, ρmf (fresh mud)
1.00 g/cm³ (printed on the attachment chart, source p.13)
Gas density, ρg
0 g/cm³ (printed on the attachment chart, source p.13 — the exam’s own “low density” gas)
Find. True porosity φ and flushed-zone filtrate saturation Sxo, both without and with the neutron excavation-effect correction.
Approach. Nothing here needs to be assumed. The attachment reproduces BOTH the φD–φN gas crossplot (source p.13, carrying true-porosity and Sxo contours and an annotation box reading ρmf=1, ρg=0, ρma=2.65 g/cm³) and the formula sheet (source p.12), which prints the two relations this question is built on:
Part (i) is those two lines evaluated directly. Part (ii) re-solves the same pair with the Segesman–Liu excavation term added to the neutron response, which is exactly how the printed chart is constructed — so part (ii) can equally be read straight off the attachment.
Apparent density porosity from ρb (the chart entry point).$$\phi_{D}=\frac{\rho_{ma}-\rho_b}{\rho_{ma}-\rho_{mf}}=\frac{2.65-2.0}{2.65-1.00}=\frac{0.65}{1.65}=\boxed{39.4\%}$$
Against φN=5% that is a 34 p.u. separation — the classic neutron-density gas crossover — and the point (φN, φD) = (5, 39.4) is where the attachment chart is entered.
WITHOUT the excavation effect: the formula sheet in one line. With ρg=0 the three-component density mixing law $\rho_b=(1-\phi)\rho_{ma}+\phi S_{xo}\rho_{mf}+\phi(1-S_{xo})\rho_g$ collapses to $\rho_b=\rho_{ma}-\phi\rho_{ma}+\phi S_{xo}$, and because $\phi S_{xo}$ IS the neutron reading, no iteration is needed:
$$\phi=\frac{\rho_{ma}-\rho_b+\phi_N}{\rho_{ma}}=\frac{2.65-2.00+0.05}{2.65}=\frac{0.70}{2.65}=\boxed{26.4\%}$$$$S_{xo}=\frac{\phi_N}{\phi}=\frac{0.05}{0.2642}=\boxed{18.9\%}$$
WITH the excavation effect: what the correction actually is. Replacing liquid-filled pore volume with gas removes far more hydrogen than simple volumetric mixing allows for, so the neutron tool reads LOWER than $\phi S_{xo}$ by the Segesman–Liu excavation term:
$$\phi_N=\phi S_{xo}-\Delta\phi_{ex},\qquad \Delta\phi_{ex}=\left(2\phi^2S_{xo}+0.04\phi\right)\left(1-S_{xo}\right)$$
The density leg picks up the companion electron-density effect: a gas of true density $\rho_g$ is seen by the density tool as an APPARENT density $\rho_{g,a}=1.335\rho_g-0.188$, i.e. $-0.19$ g/cm³ for the chart’s $\rho_g=0$, so
$$\phi_D=\frac{\phi\left[\rho_{ma}-S_{xo}\rho_{mf}-(1-S_{xo})\rho_{g,a}\right]}{\rho_{ma}-\rho_{mf}}=\frac{\phi\left(2.84-1.19\,S_{xo}\right)}{1.65}$$
Solve the pair for φ and Sxo. Two equations, two unknowns, with $\phi_D=0.3939$ and $\phi_N=0.05$. Eliminating Sxo between them and solving by bisection:
$$\phi=\boxed{26.6\%},\qquad S_{xo}=\boxed{33.3\%}$$
Cross-check against the printed chart. The same two equations reproduce the attachment’s own contours: along the φD=39.4 p.u. row the Sxo=10/20/30/40/50% curves compute to φN=0.50/2.20/4.24/6.71/9.71 p.u. against 0.49/2.18/4.29/6.80/9.81 p.u. read from the printed chart, and the φ=30% true-porosity contour to 12.0 p.u. against 11.8 p.u. read from the chart. Entering the chart at (5, 39.4) therefore lands between its 30% and 40% Sxo curves and just above its 25% porosity contour — a direct chart read of φ about 26–27% and Sxo about 33%, matching the algebra.
Quantity
Without excavation effect
With excavation effect
True porosity, φ
26.4%
26.6%
Flushed-zone filtrate saturation, Sxo
18.9%
33.3%
Check: ρma=2.65, ρmf=1 and ρg=0 g/cm³ are printed in the annotation box on the attachment chart (source p.13) — none of them is assumed, and the chart itself IS reproduced in this paper. The excavation coefficients and the apparent-gas-density relation are the standard Segesman–Liu and electron-density forms; they are used here because they reproduce the exam’s own printed contours to better than 0.5 p.u. (step 5), not as a free assumption. Note the lesson the two cases teach: true porosity barely moves (26.4% to 26.6%) while Sxo nearly doubles (18.9% to 33.3%), because the excavation term removes apparent neutron porosity that would otherwise be booked as filtrate.