NivaarExam PrepOfficial exam papers ↗

24-Pet-B1 Natural Gas Engineering · Undated paper

Question 2 of 10: Borehole Cross-Section from a Two-Arm Caliper Log

Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)

Notes on this paper

National Examinations, 17-Pet-B1, Well Logging and Formation Evaluation — May 2019, 3 hours, closed book (Sharp or Casio approved calculators permitted), 10 questions, all marked. Every question on this paper is Well Logging & Formation Evaluation content, solved to the paper as printed. Every datum here was read from the paper: the Question 9 SP track prints "SSP −80 mV" and "PSP 47 mV", its gamma-ray track prints 28, 92 and 44 API against Zones B, C and A, and the attachments supply the gas-sand chart and SP departure chart used in Questions 7 and 10.

Reference texts: Bassiouni, Theory, Measurement, and Interpretation of Well Logs (SPE Textbook Series Vol. 4); Asquith & Krygowski, Basic Well Log Analysis, 2nd ed. (AAPG); Ellis & Singer, Well Logging for Earth Scientists, 2nd ed.; Schlumberger, Log Interpretation Charts / Log Interpretation Principles and Applications.

Question 2: Borehole Cross-Section from a Two-Arm Caliper Log (6 marks)

Question text not reproduced: the examination questions are © Engineers and Geoscientists BC. Open the official past paper (linked at the top of this page) to read the question, then follow the worked solution below.

Given. A two-arm (orthogonal-axis) caliper log, Hole Diameter (inch) track, with one arm drawn solid and the other dashed. Where only the solid line is visible the dashed arm lies on top of it, i.e. both arms read the same diameter. Hole diameter increases to the right.

Find. The cross-sectional borehole shape at the depths where the hole is irregular.

Approach. A genuine two-independent-arm caliper (as opposed to a single-arm or averaged 4-arm tool) reads TWO orthogonal diameters at every depth; where the two traces coincide the hole is circular (in gauge or uniformly enlarged), and wherever they separate, the hole cross-section is elongated (non-circular) along the axis of the arm reading the larger value — a classic borehole-breakout / key-seating signature.

  1. Depth interval 1 (near top of the shown log, dashed arm reads a smaller diameter than the solid arm). The two traces diverge with the dashed-arm reading BELOW the solid-arm reading — the borehole is elongated along the solid arm's azimuth and compressed along the dashed arm's azimuth: an elliptical (ovalized) cross-section, typically from stress-induced breakout aligned with the minimum horizontal stress direction.
  2. Depth interval 2 (mid-log, the dashed arm swings to a LARGE diameter loop while the solid arm stays near gauge). One arm reads a pronounced washout excursion while the orthogonal arm barely moves — a keyhole/keyseat shape: a narrow, deep slot cut in one azimuth (commonly where the drillstring has worn a groove on the low side of a deviated hole) superimposed on an otherwise near-gauge circular hole.
  3. Depth interval 3 (about two-thirds of the way down, the sharp excursion). Here the dashed arm follows the solid arm exactly: both swing sharply to a LARGER diameter and then, a short distance lower, both swing sharply to a SMALLER diameter before returning to gauge. Because the two orthogonal arms read the same value throughout, the hole stays circular but changes size: a short circular washout (cave) directly above a circular undergauge (tight) section, such as a ledge, swelling shale or thick mud cake. This is a size irregularity, not a shape irregularity.
  4. Remaining depths (both arms track together with low-amplitude serration). The two arms read essentially the same diameter — a circular, near-gauge but rugose borehole. One isolated spike of the solid arm alone toward a smaller diameter, in the lower third, marks a very short, slightly oval (elliptical) spot.
Interval 4: circular (in gauge) Interval 1: elliptical breakout Interval 2: keyseat slot Interval 3: circular, washout then tight
Reconstructed borehole cross-sections at the four representative depth intervals identified from the two-arm caliper trace: circular baseline, an elongated (elliptical) breakout, a narrow keyseat slot on one azimuth, and a circular hole whose size changes (enlarged, then undergauge; dashed circle = gauge).
Check: the exam's own caliper-log figure carries no printed depth or diameter scale numerals beyond the "Hole Diameter (inch)" header, so the four depth intervals above are identified by the RELATIVE pattern of arm divergence read directly off the source trace, not by digitized diameters; the qualitative shape classification (circular / elliptical / keyseat / circular size change) is the graded content, per the question's own "estimate shape" wording.