24-Pet-B1 Natural Gas Engineering · Undated paper
Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)
National Examinations, 17-Pet-B1, Well Logging and Formation Evaluation — May 2019, 3 hours, closed book (Sharp or Casio approved calculators permitted), 10 questions, all marked. Every question on this paper is Well Logging & Formation Evaluation content, solved to the paper as printed. Every datum here was read from the paper: the Question 9 SP track prints "SSP −80 mV" and "PSP 47 mV", its gamma-ray track prints 28, 92 and 44 API against Zones B, C and A, and the attachments supply the gas-sand chart and SP departure chart used in Questions 7 and 10.
Reference texts: Bassiouni, Theory, Measurement, and Interpretation of Well Logs (SPE Textbook Series Vol. 4); Asquith & Krygowski, Basic Well Log Analysis, 2nd ed. (AAPG); Ellis & Singer, Well Logging for Earth Scientists, 2nd ed.; Schlumberger, Log Interpretation Charts / Log Interpretation Principles and Applications.
Question text not reproduced: the examination questions are © Engineers and Geoscientists BC. Open the official past paper (linked at the top of this page) to read the question, then follow the worked solution below.
Given. The radial invasion picture of Question 3: mud cake at the wall, a flushed zone (Rxo, Sxo) next to the hole, and the undisturbed formation (Rt, Sw) beyond the reach of the filtrate. A fresh water-base mud is assumed, so Rmf > Rw.
Find. One resistivity-versus-radial-distance diagram for (i) a transition profile and one for (ii) an annulus profile, with a description of each.
Approach. Resistivity follows the fluid that fills the pores at each radius (Archie: R rises as the conductive water saturation falls or as the water becomes fresher). Draw how the filtrate and the formation fluids are distributed outward from the wall, then convert that distribution to resistivity. Both profiles share the same end points, Rxo at the wall and Rt far out; they differ in what happens between them.
In a transition profile the flushed zone does not end at a sharp front. Filtrate saturation falls gradually from Sxo at the edge of the flushed zone (diameter di) to the native Sw at the outer limit of invasion (diameter dj). Between di and dj the pore fluid is a mixture of filtrate and formation fluid in changing proportions, so resistivity grades continuously from Rxo to Rt with no local maximum or minimum. The diagram shows a water-bearing zone with fresh mud: Rxo > Rt and resistivity falls smoothly across the transition. In a hydrocarbon zone the same shape can run the other way (Rxo < Rt), but it stays monotonic. This is the most realistic description of ordinary invasion, and it is why a single "step" invasion diameter is only an approximation. Deep, medium and shallow resistivity tools each average a different part of the grade.
An annulus profile occurs only in hydrocarbon-bearing zones, typically oil or gas zones of good permeability and high hydrocarbon saturation. The invading filtrate displaces both the movable hydrocarbon and the movable formation water. Hydrocarbon has the higher relative mobility and moves ahead more easily, so formation water is banked into a ring just beyond the flushed zone. That ring, the annulus, has a HIGHER water saturation than the uninvaded zone, and it is filled with the saline formation water rather than fresh filtrate. Its resistivity Ran is therefore lower than both Rxo (fresh filtrate) and Rt (hydrocarbon). The profile is: Rxo high near the hole, a low-resistivity dip at the annulus, then a rise to the high Rt of the hydrocarbon zone.
The annulus is transient. The banked water disperses by diffusion and gravity within days to weeks, so it is seen mainly on logs run soon after drilling. When present it matters, because a deep induction tool sits in the low-resistivity ring. The deep reading is pulled down, Rt is underestimated and Sw is overestimated, and a productive zone can be passed over as wet. A medium-deep reading that is lower than the deep reading but inconsistent with a simple invasion correction is the usual clue.
| Profile | Resistivity between Rxo and Rt | Where and why |
|---|---|---|
| (i) Transition | Gradual, monotonic change across di–dj | Any permeable zone; filtrate and formation fluid mix in changing proportions |
| (ii) Annulus | Local minimum Ran below both Rxo and Rt | Hydrocarbon zones only; formation water banked ahead of the filtrate; transient |