Question 3 of 7: Radius of investigation at the end of wellbore storage
Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)
Notes on this paper
EGBC National Exam — Petroleum Engineering, 2014-Dec. 3 hours, closed book. This sitting's own cover page reads “98-Pet-B5, Well Testing,” not Reservoir Mechanics, and every question is pressure-transient/well-test analysis (radial diffusivity, drawdown/buildup, double-porosity, sealing-fault, interference). NOTES item 4/5 state that five (5) questions constitute a complete exam and only the first five as they appear are marked; all seven questions on the paper are solved in full below. Three of the seven questions (Q3, Q4, Q6) are chart-reading questions built around semilog/log-log plots with no printed data table — every plotted value used below was read from the printed figure and is flagged check where it feeds a boxed result.
Reference texts: Lee, J., Well Testing, SPE Textbook Series Vol. 1 (diffusivity equation, type curves, radius of investigation); Earlougher, R.C., Advances in Well Test Analysis, SPE Monograph Vol. 5 (Horner analysis, superposition in time, interference and reservoir-limit tests); Bourdet, D., Well Test Analysis: The Use of Advanced Interpretation Models, Elsevier (double-porosity/Warren–Root model, sealing faults); Warren, J.E. & Root, P.J., “The Behavior of Naturally Fractured Reservoirs,” SPE Journal, 1963.
Question 3: Radius of investigation at the end of wellbore storage (20 marks)
Check: the paper prints $c_t=1\times10^{6}\ \text{psi}^{-1}$ (positive exponent); a compressibility of $10^{6}\ \text{psi}^{-1}$ is physically impossible (typical oilfield $c_t\sim10^{-6}$ to $10^{-5}\ \text{psi}^{-1}$), so this is treated as a misprint for $1\times10^{-6}\ \text{psi}^{-1}$.
Find. The radius of investigation $r_{inv}$ at the moment wellbore-storage effects end, read from the log-log and semi-log plots of the drawdown test.
Approach. Read the permeability off the slope of the semilog straight line, identify the time at which wellbore storage ends as the point where that straight line begins (confirmed against the log-log plot), then substitute both into the formula-sheet radius-of-investigation relation.
Fig. 1 – Semilog drawdown plot, $p_{wf}$ vs. $\log t$ (read from the printed figure). The straight-line (infinite-acting radial-flow) region runs from about $t=0.1$ hr to $t\approx30$–40 hr; the late-time droop beyond $\sim$100 hr reflects the closed outer boundary, not measurement error.
Fig. 2 – Log-log plot of $|p_i-p_{wf}|$ vs. $t$. The early, steep rise flattens into the same infinite-acting trend by $t\approx0.1$ hr, corroborating the semilog plot's straight-line onset.
Read the semilog slope $m$. Four points lying on the straight-line portion of Fig. 1 – $(0.1\text{ hr},1570)$, $(1\text{ hr},1535)$, $(10\text{ hr},1495)$, $(100\text{ hr},1450)$ psia – fit a least-squares line of slope
$$m\approx 40\ \text{psi/cycle}\quad\text{(Check: read from the printed chart)}$$
Permeability from the semilog slope. Using the drawdown-test slope relation from the formula sheet,
$$k=\frac{162.6\,q\mu B_o}{mh}=\frac{162.6(400)(1)(1.2)}{(40)(20)}$$
$$\boxed{k\approx 97.6\ \text{mD}}$$
Identify the end of wellbore storage. Wellbore storage distorts the data until the true infinite-acting radial-flow (semilog straight-line) response begins. Both Figs. 1 and 2 show that onset at essentially the same time – the semilog curve straightens out and the log-log curve's early steep rise flattens into the same trend – consistently by
$$t_{wbs}\approx0.1\ \text{hr}$$
(the two independent plots agreeing on this time is itself the self-check that the reading is right).
Radius of investigation at that time. Substituting $k$, $t_{wbs}$ and the given fluid/rock properties into the formula sheet's radius-of-investigation relation,
$$r_{inv}\approx\sqrt{\frac{kt}{948\,\phi\mu c_t}}=\sqrt{\frac{(97.6)(0.1)}{948(0.25)(1)(1\times10^{-6})}}$$
$$\boxed{r_{inv}\approx 203\ \text{ft}}$$