17-Phys-B1 Radiation Physics · December 2017
Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)
Paper format. 98-Phys-B1 Radiation Physics, National Examination December 2017 — a three-hour open-book examination in which any non-communicating calculator is permitted (the candidate must record the calculator's make and model on the first sheet). The cover page states the exam has 7 questions worth a total of 74 points, of which only 60 points' worth need be answered for full marks; every question and sub-part is nonetheless answered in full below so the paper remains a complete study resource. The cover page also invites the candidate to submit a written statement of any assumptions made where a question is open to interpretation — this licence is used below in Question 1(a)–(b) (the historic DOE report's "roentgens per hour" reading is converted to absorbed dose using the standard air-kerma factor since no calibration medium is stated) and 1(e) (the Canadian nuclear-energy-worker annual effective-dose limit, 50 mSv/yr, is used to size the inspection-crew rotation since the source states no dose constraint of its own), and in Question 6(a) (counting-statistics uncertainty is taken as Poisson, $\sigma(C)=\sqrt{C}$, on the one-minute count reported in each row, since the source gives no separate counting-time datum). Question 6 also carries a genuine internal inconsistency between the table header's definition of $g(t)$ and the definition restated in part (c) — both readings and the resolution adopted are flagged where they occur.
Reference texts. K. S. Krane, Introductory Nuclear Physics (nuclear reaction kinematics, pair production, fission energetics); F. H. Attix, Introduction to Radiological Physics and Radiation Dosimetry (exposure–dose conversion, photon interactions, non-ionizing radiation); J. R. Cember and T. E. Johnson, Introduction to Health Physics, 5th ed. (radiation weighting factors, ALARA dose planning, decay-counting statistics); J. E. Turner, Atoms, Radiation, and Radiation Protection, 3rd ed. (neutron detectors, radioactive decay/in-growth kinetics, radiation protection principles).
Question text not reproduced: the examination questions are © Engineers and Geoscientists BC. Open the official past paper (linked at the top of this page) to read the question, then follow the worked solution below.
Given. Town midway between two cities 100 km apart ($r_1=r_2=50$ km initially); station 1 power $P_1=70$ kW; station 2 power $P_2=50$ kW; both antennas non-directional (isotropic).
Find. The distance to travel from the town, and the direction, so the two stations' mean power densities at the traveller's new location are equal.
Approach. An isotropic antenna's mean power density falls off as $S=P/(4\pi r^2)$; since $P_1>P_2$, the town (equidistant from both) already sees a stronger field from station 1, so the traveller must move away from station 1 and toward station 2 until the two inverse-square terms balance.
| Quantity | Result |
|---|---|
| Travel distance $x$ | ≈ 4.20 km |
| Direction | Away from the 70 kW station, toward the 50 kW station |
| Equal power density $S_1=S_2$ | ≈ $1.90\times10^{-6}$ W/m$^2$ |