NivaarExam PrepOfficial exam papers ↗

17-Phys-B1 Radiation Physics · December 2017

Question 4 of 7: Pair-Production Threshold — Nuclear Field vs. Electron Field

Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)

Notes on this paper

Paper format. 98-Phys-B1 Radiation Physics, National Examination December 2017 — a three-hour open-book examination in which any non-communicating calculator is permitted (the candidate must record the calculator's make and model on the first sheet). The cover page states the exam has 7 questions worth a total of 74 points, of which only 60 points' worth need be answered for full marks; every question and sub-part is nonetheless answered in full below so the paper remains a complete study resource. The cover page also invites the candidate to submit a written statement of any assumptions made where a question is open to interpretation — this licence is used below in Question 1(a)–(b) (the historic DOE report's "roentgens per hour" reading is converted to absorbed dose using the standard air-kerma factor since no calibration medium is stated) and 1(e) (the Canadian nuclear-energy-worker annual effective-dose limit, 50 mSv/yr, is used to size the inspection-crew rotation since the source states no dose constraint of its own), and in Question 6(a) (counting-statistics uncertainty is taken as Poisson, $\sigma(C)=\sqrt{C}$, on the one-minute count reported in each row, since the source gives no separate counting-time datum). Question 6 also carries a genuine internal inconsistency between the table header's definition of $g(t)$ and the definition restated in part (c) — both readings and the resolution adopted are flagged where they occur.

Reference texts. K. S. Krane, Introductory Nuclear Physics (nuclear reaction kinematics, pair production, fission energetics); F. H. Attix, Introduction to Radiological Physics and Radiation Dosimetry (exposure–dose conversion, photon interactions, non-ionizing radiation); J. R. Cember and T. E. Johnson, Introduction to Health Physics, 5th ed. (radiation weighting factors, ALARA dose planning, decay-counting statistics); J. E. Turner, Atoms, Radiation, and Radiation Protection, 3rd ed. (neutron detectors, radioactive decay/in-growth kinetics, radiation protection principles).

Question 4: Pair-Production Threshold — Nuclear Field vs. Electron Field (6 marks)

Question text not reproduced: the examination questions are © Engineers and Geoscientists BC. Open the official past paper (linked at the top of this page) to read the question, then follow the worked solution below.

Given. Pair-production threshold in a nuclear Coulomb field $E_{\gamma,\text{nucl}}=1.022$ MeV; threshold in an electron's field (triplet production) $E_{\gamma,e}=2.044$ MeV; electron rest energy $m_ec^2=0.511$ MeV.

Find. The physical reason the two thresholds differ by exactly a factor of two.

Approach. Pair production always requires the photon's energy to exceed $2m_ec^2$ (the rest-mass energy of the created $e^-e^+$ pair), but momentum as well as energy must be conserved; the "other body" in the interaction (nucleus or electron) must absorb the photon's recoil momentum, and how much kinetic energy that recoil costs depends entirely on the recoiling body's mass.

  1. Nuclear field — negligible recoil energy. A nucleus is thousands of times more massive than an electron, so for a given recoil momentum $p$ its kinetic energy $p^2/2M$ is negligible (it can absorb essentially unlimited momentum for almost no energy cost). The photon's energy is therefore free to go almost entirely into creating the pair's rest mass: $$E_{\gamma,\text{nucl}}^{\text{threshold}} \approx 2m_ec^2 = 2(0.511\ \text{MeV})$$ $$\boxed{E_{\gamma,\text{nucl}}^{\text{threshold}} = 1.022\ \text{MeV}}$$
  2. Electron field — comparable-mass recoil (triplet production). When the "target" providing the Coulomb field is itself an electron, its mass is exactly comparable to the particles being created, so it can no longer be treated as an infinitely heavy, energy-free recoil absorber — conservation of momentum forces the target electron itself to recoil with significant kinetic energy. At threshold all three final particles (the created $e^-e^+$ pair and the recoiling target electron) move together with the same velocity, so the minimum photon energy must supply the rest-mass energy of three electron masses, not two. Using the invariant $s=(E_\gamma+m_ec^2)^2-E_\gamma^2$ and requiring $s=(3m_ec^2)^2$ at threshold: $$2E_\gamma m_ec^2 + (m_ec^2)^2 = 9(m_ec^2)^2 \;\Longrightarrow\; E_\gamma = 4m_ec^2$$ $$\boxed{E_{\gamma,e}^{\text{threshold}} = 4m_ec^2 = 4(0.511\ \text{MeV}) = 2.044\ \text{MeV}}$$ exactly double the nuclear-field threshold, because a comparable-mass recoiling body must carry away a full extra rest-mass-energy's worth of kinetic energy that a heavy nucleus would not.
Question 4 — results
ProcessThresholdReason
Nuclear-field pair production$2m_ec^2=1.022$ MeVHeavy nucleus absorbs recoil momentum at ~zero energy cost
Electron-field (triplet) production$4m_ec^2=2.044$ MeVComparable-mass recoiling electron must also gain kinetic energy