NivaarExam PrepOfficial exam papers ↗

17-Phys-B6 Applied Thermodynamics and Heat Transfer · December 2018

Question 2 of 8: Throttling Calorimeter, Steam Turbine Power, and an Apparently Isentropic Process

Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)

Notes on this paper

Paper format. 17-Phys-B6 Applied Thermodynamics and Heat Transfer, National Examination December 2018 — a three-hour open-book examination; candidates are expected to bring both a thermodynamics text and a heat-transfer text to make use of the property tables and graphs. A complete examination is five questions — either three from Part A (Thermodynamics, Q1–Q4) and two from Part B (Heat Transfer, Q5–Q8), or two from Part A and three from Part B — every question carrying equal value; all eight are solved below as a complete study set. Question 2 is solved as one connected narrative: the wet steam whose quality is measured by the throttling calorimeter in part (a) is the same steam entering the turbine in part (b), which is what makes part (c)'s "isentropic despite heat loss" observation checkable. Question 3 gives every cycle temperature directly from the printed diagram but no pressures, so it is solved purely from energy balances (constant specific heat, cold-air-standard) rather than isentropic pressure ratios — the intended reading, since no compressor/turbine pressure ratio is given anywhere on the page.

Reference texts. Y. A. Çengel and M. A. Boles, Thermodynamics: An Engineering Approach, 8th ed. (ideal-gas mixtures, air-standard Otto and Brayton cycles, throttling calorimeters, steam turbines, vapour-compression refrigeration); F. P. Incropera and D. P. DeWitt, Fundamentals of Heat and Mass Transfer, 7th ed. (composite cylindrical conduction with convection at both surfaces, heat generation in a solid cylinder, internal/external convection combined via an overall coefficient, effectiveness–NTU heat-exchanger analysis). Ammonia and steam saturation/superheat property values were computed (Bell et al., IAPWS-95 / REFPROP-quality equations of state) and cross-checked against the printed appendix tables on pages 5–6 of the source exam and standard steam tables, which they matched to 3–4 significant figures throughout.

Question 2: Throttling Calorimeter, Steam Turbine Power, and an Apparently Isentropic Process

Question text not reproduced: the examination questions are © Engineers and Geoscientists BC. Open the official past paper (linked at the top of this page) to read the question, then follow the worked solution below.

Given. A calorimeter throttles a sample of wet steam from 1 MPa down to atmospheric pressure (101.325 kPa), where it is measured superheated at $150\,{}^{\circ}\text{C}$. The SAME 1 MPa wet steam (not the throttled sample — the calorimeter only taps a measuring side-stream) then enters a turbine and expands to 7.5 kPa, 78.3% quality, with the velocities, heat loss and flow rate below.

Given data
QuantitySymbolValue
Calorimeter inlet pressure$P_1$1 MPa
Calorimeter exit (atm., superheated)$P_2,T_2$101.325 kPa, $150\,{}^{\circ}\text{C}$
Turbine inlet velocity$V_1$1.5 m/s
Turbine exit pressure, quality$P_4,x_4$7.5 kPa, 78.3%
Turbine exit velocity$V_4$90 m/s
Turbine heat loss$\dot Q_{loss}$527 W
Mass flow rate$\dot m$0.45 kg/s

Find. (a) Quality of the wet steam at 1 MPa; (b) power developed by the turbine; (c) an explanation for why $s_{in}\approx s_{out}$ across the turbine despite the heat loss.

Entropy s (kJ/kg·K)Temperature Tsaturation dome1 (1 MPa, x≈1.000)2 (0.1 MPa, 150°C)3 (7.5 kPa, x=0.783)
$T$–$s$ states: 1 (turbine inlet, 1 MPa, wet — same enthalpy as the calorimeter's throttled sample), 2 (calorimeter exit, atm., $150\,{}^{\circ}\text{C}$), 3 (turbine exit, 7.5 kPa, $x=0.783$). Throttling is isenthalpic, so $h_1=h_2$; the turbine expansion 1→3 turns out to be nearly a vertical (constant-$s$) line despite the heat loss — see part (c).

Approach. (a) Throttling is isenthalpic ($h_1=h_2$, no work, negligible $\Delta$KE/PE across a throttle), so the measured superheated enthalpy at atmospheric pressure equals the wet-steam enthalpy at 1 MPa; back out the quality from $h_1=h_f+x_1h_{fg}$ at 1 MPa. (b) This 1 MPa wet-steam state is ALSO the turbine's inlet state (same $h$), so apply the steady-flow energy equation across the turbine with both kinetic-energy terms and the stated heat loss. (c) Compute $s_1$ (from $x_1$ at 1 MPa) and $s_3$ (from $x_4=0.783$ at 7.5 kPa) and compare.

  1. Part (a) — calorimeter exit enthalpy. $$h_2=h(101.325\text{ kPa},150\,{}^{\circ}\text{C})=2776.5\text{ kJ/kg}$$ At 1 MPa: $h_f=762.5\text{ kJ/kg}$, $h_{fg}=2014.6\text{ kJ/kg}$. Since throttling is isenthalpic, $h_1=h_2=2776.5\text{ kJ/kg}$: $$x_1=\frac{h_1-h_f}{h_{fg}}=\frac{2776.5-762.5}{2014.6}$$ $$\boxed{x_1=0.9997\approx99.97\%}$$ The steam entering the turbine is thus very nearly (but not quite) saturated vapour at 1 MPa.
  2. Part (b) — turbine exit enthalpy at 7.5 kPa, $x=0.783$. From the steam tables at 7.5 kPa: $h_f=168.7\text{ kJ/kg}$, $h_{fg}=2405.3\text{ kJ/kg}$: $$h_3=h_f+x_4h_{fg}=168.7+0.783\times2405.3$$ $$\boxed{h_3=2052.1\text{ kJ/kg}}$$
  3. Part (b) — steady-flow energy equation across the turbine. $$h_1+\frac{V_1^2}{2}=h_3+\frac{V_4^2}{2}+w_s+q_{loss}$$ $$w_s=(h_1-h_3)+\frac{V_1^2-V_4^2}{2}-\frac{\dot Q_{loss}}{\dot m}$$ $$w_s=(2776.5-2052.1)+\frac{1.5^2-90^2}{2\times1000}-\frac{0.527}{0.45}$$ $$w_s=724.4-4.05-1.171$$ $$\boxed{w_s=719.2\text{ kJ/kg}}$$ $$\dot W_t=\dot m\,w_s=0.45\times719.2$$ $$\boxed{\dot W_t=323.6\text{ kW}}$$
  4. Part (c) — entropy check. $$s_1=s_f+x_1s_{fg}\Big|_{1\text{ MPa}}=2.1381+0.9997\times4.4470=6.584\text{ kJ/kg}\cdot\text{K}$$ $$s_3=s_f+x_4s_{fg}\Big|_{7.5\text{ kPa}}=0.5763+0.783\times7.6738=6.585\text{ kJ/kg}\cdot\text{K}$$ $$\boxed{s_1=6.584\text{ kJ/kg}\cdot\text{K}\approx s_3=6.585\text{ kJ/kg}\cdot\text{K}}$$ The two entropies match to within the tables' own rounding — the process reads as isentropic even though it is neither adiabatic (there IS a heat loss) nor reversible (a real turbine has friction/eddy losses). The explanation: an entropy balance on the turbine is $s_3-s_1=-q_{loss}/T_b+\sigma_{gen}$, where $T_b$ is the boundary temperature the heat leaves through and $\sigma_{gen}\geq0$ is entropy generated by irreversibility. Heat LEAVING the control volume removes entropy ($-q_{loss}/T_b\lt0$), while internal irreversibility (friction in the blading, mixing losses) ADDS entropy ($\sigma_{gen}\gt0$). For THIS particular turbine the two effects happen to cancel almost exactly, so $\Delta s\approx0$ — a numerical coincidence of the given data, not a sign that the process is reversible and adiabatic. "Isentropic" describes the net entropy change; it does not by itself imply either zero heat transfer or zero irreversibility individually.
Question 2 — results
QuantityValue
(a) Quality of wet steam at 1 MPa, $x_1$0.9997
(b) Turbine specific work $w_s$719.2 kJ/kg
(b) Turbine power $\dot W_t$323.6 kW
(c) $s_1$ vs. $s_3$6.584 vs. 6.585 kJ/kg·K (equal within rounding)