NivaarExam PrepOfficial exam papers ↗

17-Phys-B7 Structure of Materials · December 2016

Question 5 of 7: Microstructural Characterization

Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)

Notes on this paper

Paper format. 98-Phys-B7 Structure of Materials, National Examination December 2016 — a closed-book examination (Casio or Sharp approved calculators only; all necessary equations, constants, the error-function table and the Cu–Ag phase diagram are supplied in the paper's own appendix). Candidates attempt any five of the seven questions, each worth 20 marks; every question is nonetheless answered in full below so the paper remains a complete study resource. This sitting numbers its questions with Roman numerals (Question I–VII) while sub-items inside each question use Arabic numerals (1., 2., 3.).

Reference texts. W. D. Callister Jr. & D. G. Rethwisch, Materials Science and Engineering: An Introduction, 10th ed. (atomic bonding, crystal structure and packing, point defects, diffusion, dislocations and slip, mechanical properties, phase diagrams and the lever rule, X-ray diffraction); D. J. Griffiths, Introduction to Quantum Mechanics, 3rd ed. (Bohr model, de Broglie wavelength, Heisenberg uncertainty).

Question V: Microstructural Characterization (20 marks)

Question text not reproduced: the examination questions are © Engineers and Geoscientists BC. Open the official past paper (linked at the top of this page) to read the question, then follow the worked solution below.

Part 1 — Given. BCC iron, $2\theta_{110}=44.704^\circ$, $\lambda=0.1541$ nm ($n=1$).

Find. Lattice constant $a$, and the incidence angle $\theta_{211}$ for $\{211\}$.

  1. Interplanar spacing from Bragg's law. $\theta_{110}=44.704^\circ/2 =22.352^\circ$. $$d_{110}=\frac{\lambda}{2\sin\theta_{110}} =\frac{0.1541}{2\sin(22.352^\circ)}=\boxed{0.2026\ \text{nm}}.$$
  2. Lattice constant. For a cubic system $d_{hkl}=a/\sqrt{h^2+k^2+l^2}$, so for $(110)$, $\sqrt{1^2+1^2+0^2}=\sqrt2$: $$a=d_{110}\sqrt2=0.2026\times1.414=\boxed{0.2865\ \text{nm}}.$$ This matches the BCC-iron lattice parameter given in Question III.1 ($0.2866$ nm), confirming the sample is iron.
  3. $\{211\}$ spacing and angle. $h+k+l=2+1+1=4$ is even, so $(211)$ is an allowed BCC reflection. $d_{211}=a/\sqrt{2^2+1^2+1^2}=0.2865/\sqrt6=0.1170\ \text{nm}$. $$\sin\theta_{211}=\frac{\lambda}{2d_{211}}=\frac{0.1541}{2\times0.1170}=0.659\ \Rightarrow\ \theta_{211}=\boxed{41.2^\circ}\ (2\theta_{211}=82.4^\circ).$$

Part 2 — Given. Two electron-beam imaging techniques: SEM and TEM.

Find. Their differences in principle, beam energy, resolution/magnification, and 3-D imaging ability; which reveals sub-surface dislocations.

AspectSEMTEM
(a) Physical principleA finely focused beam is raster-scanned across the sample surface; secondary and backscattered electrons ejected from a shallow surface layer are collected to build the imageA broad, high-energy beam is transmitted THROUGH an electron-transparent thin foil; the transmitted/diffracted electrons form the image (bright-field/dark-field diffraction contrast)
(b) Typical beam energy$\sim1$–30 keV$\sim100$–300 keV (much higher, needed to transmit through the sample)
(c) Resolution / magnification$\sim1$–20 nm; up to $\sim10^5\times$Sub-nanometre (near-atomic); up to $\sim10^6\times$ or beyond — substantially finer than SEM
(d) 3-D imagingLarge depth of field gives a strongly topographic, pseudo-3-D appearance from a single imageProduces a 2-D projection through the foil thickness; no inherent depth information from one image (3-D reconstruction needs tilt-series tomography)

Because dislocations are internal, bulk crystal defects, only a technique that images through the material can reveal them: $$\boxed{\text{TEM}}$$ (via diffraction contrast in a thin foil) is the standard technique for imaging sub-surface dislocation activity; SEM only probes the near-surface region and cannot directly resolve internal dislocations.

Final results — Question V
QuantityValue
$d_{110}$$0.2026$ nm
Lattice constant $a$$0.2865$ nm
$d_{211}$$0.1170$ nm
$\theta_{211}$ ($2\theta_{211}$)$41.2^\circ$ ($82.4^\circ$)
Reveals sub-surface dislocationsTEM