NivaarExam PrepOfficial exam papers ↗

07-Str-A1 · May 2017

Question 1 of 8: Stability and Degree of Static Indeterminacy

Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)

Notes on this paper

Paper format. 07-Str-A1 Elementary Structural Analysis, National Examinations, May 2017. Three hours, CLOSED BOOK (an approved Sharp or Casio calculator is permitted). Page 1 states that six questions constitute a complete paper: Questions 1–5 are compulsory and the candidate answers one only of Questions 6, 7 or 8. All eight questions are worked below.

Sign conventions used throughout. Sagging bending moment is positive and is plotted above the axis; shear is the sum of the upward forces on the portion to the left of the section. Truss member forces are quoted as T for tension and C for compression. In the slope-deflection work of Question 7 the member-end moments follow the usual convention — clockwise on the member end taken as positive — so the sagging moment is $+M_{ij}$ at the left end of a member and $-M_{ji}$ at its right end. For the bent members of Questions 2(c) the diagrams are developed: the abscissa is distance measured along the member axis, not the horizontal projection.

Reference texts.

Question 1: Stability and Degree of Static Indeterminacy (6 marks)

Question text not reproduced: the examination questions are © Engineers and Geoscientists BC. Open the official past paper (linked at the top of this page) to read the question, then follow the worked solution below.

Given. Six plane structures, read from the examination figure as follows.

StructureWhat the drawing shows
(a)Continuous beam: built-in (fixed) at the left wall, then three roller supports; two internal hinges between the first and second rollers.
(b)Two overlapping beams at slightly different levels, each built in to its own wall, connected in the overlap by a short vertical pin link (the small circle is drawn between the two member lines, not on either).
(c)Rigid “M”-shaped frame of beam-type members: pin at the left leg, fixed base at the centre leg, pin at the right leg; no closed loop and no internal release.
(d)A single straight inclined member at 45° (the horizontal and vertical lines that close the triangle are dimension lines, marked 90°). Roller on horizontal ground at the foot, roller bearing on a surface parallel to the member at mid-length, roller on a vertical wall at the head.
(e)Truss: four joints, five members (top chord, two inclined sides, two crossing unconnected diagonals; no bottom chord); pin and roller.
(f)Truss: eight joints, thirteen members; three supports down the left edge — a horizontal link at the top, and rollers bearing on the vertical wall at mid-height and at the bottom. The applied loads $P$ are vertical.

Find. For each structure, the classification (unstable / determinate / indeterminate) and, where indeterminate, the degree.

all three lines meet hereR₁ (vertical)R₃ (horizontal)R₂ ⊥ member(d) r = 3, yet a mechanism45° member ⇒ reactions concurrentPP(f) r = 3, yet a mechanismthree horizontal links ⇒ no vertical restraintΣFᵧ = −2P ≠ 0 for any horizontal reactions
The two structures whose classification is decided by arrangement, not by the count. Left, (d): the three reaction lines of action meet at one point, so the member can rotate about it. Right, (f): all three reactions are horizontal, so nothing resists the vertical loads.

Approach. Count first — for beams and frames $i = r - 3 - c$ (reaction components, less the three equilibrium equations, less one for each condition equation released by an internal hinge or link); for trusses compare $m + r$ with $2j$ — then test the arrangement, because a count of zero only guarantees determinacy if the restraints are neither concurrent nor parallel and the bracing is complete.

  1. Part (a) — continuous beam with two hinges. The reaction components are three at the fixed end and one at each of the three rollers, and each internal hinge supplies one condition equation: $$i = r - 3 - c = (3 + 1 + 1 + 1) - 3 - 2 = \boxed{1}$$ The beam is statically indeterminate to the first degree. Every part of it is restrained, so there is no mechanism to look for.
  2. Part (b) — two built-in beams joined by a link. Read as drawn, this is two separate rigid bodies. Each carries its own three reaction components at its wall; the link between them transmits one force along its own axis. Counting bodies rather than reactions, $$i = (\text{unknowns}) - (\text{equations}) = (3 + 3 + 1) - (3 \times 2) = \boxed{1}$$ so it is statically indeterminate to the first degree. Each cantilever is stable on its own, so the extra link is a genuine redundancy and not a mechanism.
  3. Part (c) — rigid multi-legged frame. There is no closed loop of members and no internal release, so the whole frame is one rigid body and only the external count matters: $$i = r - 3 = (2 + 3 + 2) - 3 = \boxed{4}$$ It is statically indeterminate to the fourth degree. The three support points are not collinear and the reactions are neither all parallel nor concurrent, so it is stable.
  4. Part (d) — count says determinate. A single member carries three reaction components, one from each roller, so $$i = r - 3 = 3 - 3 = 0$$ By count the member is statically determinate. That is the trap.
  5. Part (d) — the arrangement says otherwise. Put the foot at the origin and the head at $(a,\,a)$, which is what the 45° drawing with the 90° mark on the enclosing triangle means. The foot roller acts vertically, so its line of action is $x = 0$; the head roller bears on the vertical wall and acts horizontally, so its line is $y = a$. These two meet at the corner $C = (0,\,a)$. The mid-length roller acts normal to the member at $M = (a/2,\,a/2)$, and $$(C - M)\cdot \hat{u} = \left(-\tfrac{a}{2},\ \tfrac{a}{2}\right)\cdot \frac{1}{\sqrt2}\,(1,\,1) = \frac{1}{\sqrt2}\left(-\tfrac{a}{2}+\tfrac{a}{2}\right) = 0$$ so the third line of action passes through $C$ as well. All three reactions are concurrent, the member is free to rotate about $C$, and structure (d) is unstable (a mechanism). Note that the concurrency is exact only at 45°: for a head at $(2a,\,a)$ the same dot product is $-0.45a \neq 0$ and the member would be determinate.
  6. Part (e) — truss count. Four joints, five members (the two crossing diagonals are separate members, unconnected where they cross), pin plus roller: $$m + r = 5 + 3 = 8 = 2j = 2(4)$$ Building the truss outward — the pinned joint is fixed, the two members meeting at each remaining joint locate it in turn, and the roller takes the last degree of freedom — leaves no free motion, so structure (e) is statically determinate (and stable). Solving the joint equilibrium matrix numerically confirms full rank 8.
  7. Part (f) — count says determinate, arrangement says mechanism. Thirteen members, eight joints, three reaction components: $$m + r = 13 + 3 = 16 = 2j = 2(8)$$ But all three supports on the left edge act horizontally — a link at the top and rollers bearing on the vertical wall at the other two. Three parallel reactions cannot equilibrate the two vertical loads: $$\sum F_y = -\,2P \neq 0 \quad \text{for any set of horizontal reactions}$$ Structure (f) is therefore unstable. The equilibrium matrix is rank 15 against 16 equations, one short, which is the algebraic statement of the same fact.
StructureCountClassification
(a) continuous beam, 2 hinges$r-3-c = 6-3-2 = 1$ Statically indeterminate, 1st degree
(b) two beams + link$7 - 6 = 1$ Statically indeterminate, 1st degree
(c) rigid M-frame$r-3 = 7-3 = 4$ Statically indeterminate, 4th degree
(d) 45° member, 3 rollers$r-3 = 0$ Unstable — reactions concurrent
(e) truss, crossing diagonals$m+r = 8 = 2j$ Statically determinate
(f) truss, 3 horizontal links$m+r = 16 = 2j$ Unstable — reactions parallel

Check: two readings of the drawing carry the answers for (b) and (d). In (b) the small circle is drawn between two member lines of different extent, which is the standard notation for a link connecting two beams; read instead as a single continuous beam with one internal hinge the answer would be $6-3-1 = 2$. In (d) the enclosing triangle is dimension lines (they do not touch the joint circles), and the legs are drawn equal with the 90° corner marked, which is what makes the member exactly 45° and the reactions concurrent.

← Paper overview