Question 7 of 8: Frame by Slope Deflection — Shear and Moment Diagrams
Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)
Notes on this paper
Paper format. 07-Str-A1 Elementary Structural Analysis,
National Examinations, May 2017. Three hours, CLOSED BOOK (an approved Sharp or
Casio calculator is permitted). Page 1 states that six questions
constitute a complete paper: Questions 1–5 are compulsory and the candidate
answers one only of Questions 6, 7 or 8. All eight questions are worked
below.
Sign conventions used throughout. Sagging bending moment is
positive and is plotted above the axis; shear is the sum of the upward forces on
the portion to the left of the section. Truss member forces are quoted as
T for tension and C for compression. In the slope-deflection
work of Question 7 the member-end moments follow the usual convention —
clockwise on the member end taken as positive — so the sagging moment is
$+M_{ij}$ at the left end of a member and $-M_{ji}$ at its right end. For the
bent members of Questions 2(c) the diagrams are developed: the abscissa
is distance measured along the member axis, not the horizontal projection.
vertical, $L = 5$ m, stiffness $1.5EI$; joint 4 is a fixed support
Member 2–5
vertical, $L = 5$ m, stiffness $EI$; joint 5 is a pin support
Assumption stated on the paper
all members inextensible
Find. All member-end moments, and the shear force and bending
moment diagrams for every member with their maximum and minimum ordinates.
Question 7: the frame, and the shear and bending moment diagrams for the loaded member 2–3. The unloaded members carry linear moment diagrams and constant shears, tabulated below.
Approach. Establish first that the frame cannot sway, so the
only unknowns are the rotations $\theta_2$ and $\theta_3$. Then write the
slope-deflection equations, using the modified stiffness $3EI/L$ for the two
members whose far ends are pinned, solve the two joint-equilibrium equations, and
back-substitute.
Prove there is no sidesway. Member 2–5 is vertical,
inextensible and pinned to the ground at 5, so joint 2 cannot move vertically:
$v_2 = 0$. Member 1–2 is inextensible with unit vector $(0.8,\,0.6)$ and
joint 1 is a pin support, so $0.8u_2 + 0.6v_2 = 0$, giving $u_2 = 0$. The
horizontal member then carries $u_3 = u_2 = 0$, and the vertical column
3–4, inextensible and fixed at 4, gives $v_3 = 0$. Both joints are held,
so the only kinematic unknowns are the two rotations. This is why the paper
states that the members are inextensible — without it the sway degree
of freedom would have to be carried and the question would be far longer.
Fixed-end moments. Only member 2–3 is loaded:
$$\text{FEM}_{23} = -\frac{wL^2}{12} = -\frac{9(10)^2}{12} = -75.0\ \text{kN}\,\text{m},
\qquad \text{FEM}_{32} = +75.0\ \text{kN}\,\text{m}$$
Slope-deflection equations. With $\psi = 0$ throughout and
the modified form $M = (3EI/L)\theta$ for a member whose far end is a pin,
$$M_{21} = \tfrac{3EI}{5}\theta_2 = 0.6EI\theta_2, \qquad
M_{25} = \tfrac{3EI}{5}\theta_2 = 0.6EI\theta_2$$
$$M_{23} = \tfrac{2(2EI)}{10}(2\theta_2 + \theta_3) - 75.0
= 0.8EI\theta_2 + 0.4EI\theta_3 - 75.0$$
$$M_{32} = 0.8EI\theta_3 + 0.4EI\theta_2 + 75.0, \qquad
M_{34} = \tfrac{2(1.5EI)}{5}(2\theta_3) = 1.2EI\theta_3, \qquad
M_{43} = 0.6EI\theta_3$$
with $M_{12} = M_{52} = 0$ at the two pinned bases.
Joint equilibrium. The moments meeting at each rigid joint
must sum to zero:
$$\text{Joint 2:}\quad M_{21} + M_{25} + M_{23} = 0
\;\Rightarrow\; 2.0EI\theta_2 + 0.4EI\theta_3 = 75.0$$
$$\text{Joint 3:}\quad M_{32} + M_{34} = 0
\;\Rightarrow\; 0.4EI\theta_2 + 2.0EI\theta_3 = -75.0$$
Solve. The system is antisymmetric, so
$EI\theta_3 = -EI\theta_2$ and $(2.0-0.4)EI\theta_2 = 75.0$:
$$\boxed{EI\theta_2 = 46.875\ \text{kN}\,\text{m}^2, \qquad
EI\theta_3 = -46.875\ \text{kN}\,\text{m}^2}$$
Back-substitute for the end moments.
$$M_{21} = M_{25} = 0.6(46.875) = 28.125\ \text{kN}\,\text{m}$$
$$M_{23} = 0.8(46.875) + 0.4(-46.875) - 75.0 = -56.25\ \text{kN}\,\text{m},
\qquad M_{32} = +56.25\ \text{kN}\,\text{m}$$
$$M_{34} = 1.2(-46.875) = -56.25\ \text{kN}\,\text{m}, \qquad
M_{43} = 0.6(-46.875) = -28.125\ \text{kN}\,\text{m}$$
Both joint checks close exactly:
$28.125 + 28.125 - 56.25 = 0$ and $56.25 - 56.25 = 0$.
Member 2–3: shear and moment. The end moments are
equal and opposite in the clockwise convention, so they contribute nothing to the
shear and the reactions are those of a simple span:
$$V_2 = \frac{wL}{2} + \frac{M_{23}+M_{32}}{L} = 45.0 + 0 = 45.0\ \text{kN},
\qquad V_3 = -45.0\ \text{kN}$$
Zero shear at mid-span, $x = 5$ m, and the sagging moment there is
$$M(5) = M_{23} + V_2(5) - \frac{9(5)^2}{2} = -56.25 + 225.0 - 112.5
= \boxed{+56.25\ \text{kN}\,\text{m}}$$
with hogging moments of $-56.25$ kN·m at both ends. The two points of
contraflexure sit at $x = 1.46$ m and $x = 8.54$ m, from
$-56.25 + 45x - 4.5x^2 = 0$.
Unloaded members. Each carries a linear moment diagram and
a constant shear $V = -(M_{ij}+M_{ji})/L$:
member 3–4 runs from $-56.25$ kN·m at joint 3 to $+28.125$
kN·m at the fixed base (a point of contraflexure 3.33 m below joint 3)
with a constant shear of 16.875 kN; members 1–2 and 2–5 each run from
zero at their pinned end to $28.125$ kN·m at joint 2, with a constant
shear of 5.625 kN.