Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)
Paper format. 07-Str-A5 Advanced Structural Design, National Exams, December 2013 — 3 hours, closed book (handbooks and textbooks permitted, no notes). Seven questions of equal value; any five constitute a complete paper. All seven are solved here, because the set is intended as a study resource. All loads printed on the figures are unfactored.
Design data given on the paper (SI). Concrete $f'_c = 30$ MPa; structural steel $F_y = 350$ MPa; reinforcing steel $f_y = 400$ MPa. Prestressed concrete: $f'_{ci} = 35$ MPa at transfer, $f'_c = 50$ MPa, $n = 6$, $f_{pu} = 1750$ MPa, $f_{py} = 1450$ MPa, $f_{initial} = 1200$ MPa, losses $= 240$ MPa (hence $f_{pe} = 960$ MPa).
Reference texts. CSA S16 Design of Steel Structures with the CISC Handbook of Steel Construction — plate girders (Cl. 14), lateral–torsional buckling (Cl. 13.6), plastic design (Cl. 8.6, 13.7), beam-columns (Cl. 13.8), composite beams (Cl. 17), connections (Cl. 21); CSA A23.3 Design of Concrete Structures — flexure and shear (Cl. 10, 11), slenderness (Cl. 10.13–10.16), footings (Cl. 15), prestressed concrete (Cl. 18); NBCC for load combinations; C. G. Salmon, J. E. Johnson & F. A. Malhas, Steel Structures: Design and Behavior; J. G. MacGregor & J. K. Wight, Reinforced Concrete: Mechanics and Design; T. Y. Lin & N. H. Burns, Design of Prestressed Concrete Structures; L. S. Beedle, Plastic Design of Steel Frames.
Check: load factors. The paper states only that the printed loads are unfactored, and gives no dead/live split. Every question below therefore treats each printed concentrated load as specified live load and factors it by $\alpha_L = 1.5$ (NBCC principal case $1.25D + 1.5L$); member self-weight, wherever it matters, is estimated from the trial section and factored at $1.25$. A candidate assuming a different split would obtain proportionally different sizes; the method is what is examined.
Check: section properties. All steel sections selected below are quoted by their plate dimensions (flange $b \times t$, web $h \times w$) and every property — $A$, $I_x$, $I_y$, $Z$, $J$, $C_w$, $r_x$, $r_y$ — is computed from those dimensions with root fillets neglected (slightly conservative). This makes every line checkable without a handbook; a rolled shape of equal or greater properties may be substituted directly.
Check: reading of Figures 3 and 4. On the examination drawing the dimension chain under Figure 3 reads 3 m + 4 m + 7 m + 4 m, and the overall dimension reads 15 m. Reading the drawing directly resolves this: the 15 m dimension line spans B to C ($4 + 7 + 4 = 15$ m) and the 3 m is a cantilever overhang projecting beyond support B to the free end A, which carries the 80 kN load. Similarly in Figure 4 the 10.5 m is the overall width of the floor ($3 \times 3.5$ m beam spacing), not a span; the design span is the 15 m stated in the note. Both readings are self-consistent and are used throughout.
Check: support conditions in Figure 2. The frame drawing shows identical triangle-and-roller symbols at A and D, and the frame must resist the 80 kN horizontal load, so both bases are taken as pinned. The frame is then statically indeterminate to the first degree, which is the classical form of this problem for both the elastic (Questions 2, 3) and the plastic (Questions 5, 6) treatments.
