NivaarExam PrepOfficial exam papers ↗

07-Str-A5 · December 2013

Question 4 of 7: Prestressed concrete T-beam — no-tension design and tendon profile

Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)

Notes on this paper

Paper format. 07-Str-A5 Advanced Structural Design, National Exams, December 2013 — 3 hours, closed book (handbooks and textbooks permitted, no notes). Seven questions of equal value; any five constitute a complete paper. All seven are solved here, because the set is intended as a study resource. All loads printed on the figures are unfactored.

Design data given on the paper (SI). Concrete $f'_c = 30$ MPa; structural steel $F_y = 350$ MPa; reinforcing steel $f_y = 400$ MPa. Prestressed concrete: $f'_{ci} = 35$ MPa at transfer, $f'_c = 50$ MPa, $n = 6$, $f_{pu} = 1750$ MPa, $f_{py} = 1450$ MPa, $f_{initial} = 1200$ MPa, losses $= 240$ MPa (hence $f_{pe} = 960$ MPa).

Reference texts. CSA S16 Design of Steel Structures with the CISC Handbook of Steel Construction — plate girders (Cl. 14), lateral–torsional buckling (Cl. 13.6), plastic design (Cl. 8.6, 13.7), beam-columns (Cl. 13.8), composite beams (Cl. 17), connections (Cl. 21); CSA A23.3 Design of Concrete Structures — flexure and shear (Cl. 10, 11), slenderness (Cl. 10.13–10.16), footings (Cl. 15), prestressed concrete (Cl. 18); NBCC for load combinations; C. G. Salmon, J. E. Johnson & F. A. Malhas, Steel Structures: Design and Behavior; J. G. MacGregor & J. K. Wight, Reinforced Concrete: Mechanics and Design; T. Y. Lin & N. H. Burns, Design of Prestressed Concrete Structures; L. S. Beedle, Plastic Design of Steel Frames.

Check: load factors. The paper states only that the printed loads are unfactored, and gives no dead/live split. Every question below therefore treats each printed concentrated load as specified live load and factors it by $\alpha_L = 1.5$ (NBCC principal case $1.25D + 1.5L$); member self-weight, wherever it matters, is estimated from the trial section and factored at $1.25$. A candidate assuming a different split would obtain proportionally different sizes; the method is what is examined.

Check: section properties. All steel sections selected below are quoted by their plate dimensions (flange $b \times t$, web $h \times w$) and every property — $A$, $I_x$, $I_y$, $Z$, $J$, $C_w$, $r_x$, $r_y$ — is computed from those dimensions with root fillets neglected (slightly conservative). This makes every line checkable without a handbook; a rolled shape of equal or greater properties may be substituted directly.

Check: reading of Figures 3 and 4. On the examination drawing the dimension chain under Figure 3 reads 3 m + 4 m + 7 m + 4 m, and the overall dimension reads 15 m. Reading the drawing directly resolves this: the 15 m dimension line spans B to C ($4 + 7 + 4 = 15$ m) and the 3 m is a cantilever overhang projecting beyond support B to the free end A, which carries the 80 kN load. Similarly in Figure 4 the 10.5 m is the overall width of the floor ($3 \times 3.5$ m beam spacing), not a span; the design span is the 15 m stated in the note. Both readings are self-consistent and are used throughout.

Check: support conditions in Figure 2. The frame drawing shows identical triangle-and-roller symbols at A and D, and the frame must resist the 80 kN horizontal load, so both bases are taken as pinned. The frame is then statically indeterminate to the first degree, which is the classical form of this problem for both the elastic (Questions 2, 3) and the plastic (Questions 5, 6) treatments.

Q1 girder 250×18 / 900×10d = 936 mmQ5–Q6 frame 340×22 / 700×14d = 744 mmQ7 floor beam 260×22 / 650×12d = 694 mm
The three welded I-sections selected in this paper, drawn to a common scale.

Question 4: Prestressed concrete T-beam — no-tension design and tendon profile (12 + 6 + 2 = 20 marks)

Question text not reproduced: the examination questions are © Engineers and Geoscientists BC. Open the official past paper (linked at the top of this page) to read the question, then follow the worked solution below.

Given. The design starts from a post-tensioned T-beam of 15 m clear span with a 3 m overhang, with $f'_{ci} = 35$ MPa at transfer and $f'_c = 50$ MPa in service.

Given data
QuantitySymbolValue
Simply supported span B–C$L$15 000 mm
Cantilever overhang beyond B$L_c$3 000 mm, free end A
Point loads on the span$P$300 kN at 4 m and 11 m from B
Point load at the free end A$P_A$80 kN
Initial / effective tendon stress$f_{pi}$ / $f_{pe}$1200 MPa / 960 MPa (240 MPa losses)
Strand area (15.2 mm seven-wire)$A_{p1}$140 mm²

Find. Cross-section dimensions, the number of strands and the effective prestress force such that no tensile stress occurs anywhere at transfer or in service, and the tendon profile that delivers it.

centroidal axisABC80 kN300 kN300 kN18 − 15.2 mm strands, e = 430 mme = 1503 m4 m7 m4 m15 mHarped tendon profile — harp points 5 m and 11 m from B
Figure 3 as drawn, with the harped tendon profile adopted in Step 6 superimposed.

Approach. Compute the gross section properties and kern distances, obtain the service and self-weight moment envelopes, combine the "no tension at the bottom in service" and "no tension at the top at transfer" conditions into a single requirement on $P_e$, choose a strand count, then plot the permissible cable zone and fit a harped profile inside it.

  1. Fix the section and compute its properties. Try a flange $1200 \times 200$ mm on a $350$ mm web, total depth 1400 mm ($L/h \approx 10.7$, appropriate for two 300 kN point loads). Then $$A = 660\,000\ \text{mm}^2, \quad y_t = 545.5, \quad y_b = 854.5\ \text{mm}, \quad I_g = 126.0 \times 10^9\ \text{mm}^4,$$ so $S_t = 231.1 \times 10^6$ and $S_b = 147.5 \times 10^6$ mm³, and the kern distances are $k_t = S_b/A = 223.5$ mm and $k_b = S_t/A = 350.1$ mm. Self-weight is $15.84$ kN/m.
  2. Obtain the moments. The overhang produces a hogging moment at B of $M_B = -(80)(3) - 15.84(3)^2/2 = -311.3$ kN·m, of which $-71.3$ kN·m is self-weight. Carrying that end moment into the span together with the two 300 kN loads and the uniform self-weight gives a service maximum at mid-span, $$M_s = 1489.9\ \text{kN}\cdot\text{m} \quad\text{with}\quad M_{sw} = 409.9\ \text{kN}\cdot\text{m}\ \text{at the same section.}$$
  3. Combine the two no-tension conditions. No tension at the bottom in service requires $P_e(k_t + e) \ge M_s$; no tension at the top at transfer requires $e \le k_b + M_{sw}/P_i$. Eliminating $e$ between them, with $P_i = (1200/960)P_e = 1.25P_e$, gives the section requirement $$P_e \ge \frac{M_s - 0.8M_{sw}}{k_t + k_b} = \frac{(1489.9 - 0.8 \times 409.9) \times 10^6}{223.5 + 350.1} = \boxed{2026\ \text{kN}}.$$ This corresponds to 15.1 strands, but at exactly that force the two bounds on $e$ coincide and there is no usable cable zone, so a margin is needed.
  4. Choose the tendon. Provide $18 - 15.2$ mm strands, $A_{ps} = 2520$ mm², giving $$P_e = 2520(960) = 2419\ \text{kN}, \qquad P_i = 2520(1200) = 3024\ \text{kN},$$ grouped in three ducts of six and stressed from both ends. The cable zone at mid-span then opens to $392 \le e \le 486$ mm, a 93 mm band, which is workable.
  5. Plot the cable zone along the member. Evaluating $e_{min} = M_s/P_e - k_t$ and $e_{max} = k_b + M_{sw}/P_i$ section by section gives
Permissible cable zone, measured from B (eccentricity below the centroid positive)
Section, $x$ (m)$e_{min}$ (mm)$e_{max}$ (mm)Adopted $e$ (mm)
0 (support B)—327150
4322448374
5 (harp point)351465430
7.5 (mid-span)392486430
11 (harp point)382459430
1393415215
  1. Fit a harped profile, not a parabola. Between two equal point loads the moment diagram is a straight line, so the cable zone is essentially flat there; a single parabola with its vertex at mid-span sits too low at the load points and too high at the vertex, and deepening the section does not help because both bounds move together. Adopt instead a harped profile: $e = 0$ at the free end A, rising to 150 mm at B, ramping to 430 mm at the first harp point 5 m from B, held constant to the second harp point at 11 m, then ramping back to $e = 0$ at the anchorage at C. Every ordinate in the table above falls inside its zone.
  2. Verify the extreme-fibre stresses. With $P_e = 2419$ kN and $e = 430$ mm at mid-span, $$\sigma_{bot,serv} = \frac{P_e}{A} + \frac{P_ee}{S_b} - \frac{M_s}{S_b} = 3.67 + 7.05 - 10.10 = +0.62\ \text{MPa (compression)},$$ $$\sigma_{top,trans} = \frac{P_i}{A} - \frac{P_ie}{S_t} + \frac{M_{sw}}{S_t} = 4.58 - 5.63 + 1.77 = +0.73\ \text{MPa (compression)}.$$ Repeating at every section listed, and along the overhang, the extreme-fibre stress is compressive everywhere; the largest value is $\boxed{11.2\ \text{MPa}}$ at the bottom at transfer, against the limits $0.6f'_{ci} = 21$ MPa at transfer and $0.6f'_c = 30$ MPa in service. The no-tension requirement is met throughout.
  3. Check the ultimate limit state. Factoring the loads gives $M_f = 2132$ kN·m at mid-span. With $d_p = y_t + e = 975.5$ mm and a stress at ultimate of about $f_{pr} = 1600$ MPa, the compression block depth is $a = 120$ mm, which stays inside the 200 mm flange, so $$M_r = \phi_p A_{ps}f_{pr}\left(d_p - \frac{a}{2}\right) = 3322\ \text{kN}\cdot\text{m} \; > \; 2132\ \text{kN}\cdot\text{m}.$$ Strength is comfortable, as it usually is when a member is proportioned for zero tension; provide nominal untensioned bars in the flange over the support to control cracking on the overhang.
Question 4 — final results
ItemResult
Cross-sectionT-beam, flange $1200 \times 200$ mm, web 350 mm, $h = 1400$ mm
Gross properties$A = 660\,000$ mm², $I_g = 126.0 \times 10^9$ mm⁴, $y_b = 854.5$ mm
Kern distances$k_t = 223.5$ mm, $k_b = 350.1$ mm
Minimum prestress$P_e \ge 2026$ kN
Tendon provided$18 - 15.2$ mm strands; $P_i = 3024$ kN, $P_e = 2419$ kN
ProfileHarped: $e = 0$ at A, 150 mm at B, 430 mm from 5 m to 11 m, 0 at C
Extreme stressesAll compressive; max 11.2 MPa $< 0.6f'_{ci} = 21$ MPa  ✓
Ultimate check$M_r = 3322$ kN·m $> M_f = 2132$ kN·m  ✓