NivaarExam PrepOfficial exam papers ↗

07-Str-A5 · December 2013

Question 5 of 7: Plastic design of the steel frame, and the welded corner at B

Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)

Notes on this paper

Paper format. 07-Str-A5 Advanced Structural Design, National Exams, December 2013 — 3 hours, closed book (handbooks and textbooks permitted, no notes). Seven questions of equal value; any five constitute a complete paper. All seven are solved here, because the set is intended as a study resource. All loads printed on the figures are unfactored.

Design data given on the paper (SI). Concrete $f'_c = 30$ MPa; structural steel $F_y = 350$ MPa; reinforcing steel $f_y = 400$ MPa. Prestressed concrete: $f'_{ci} = 35$ MPa at transfer, $f'_c = 50$ MPa, $n = 6$, $f_{pu} = 1750$ MPa, $f_{py} = 1450$ MPa, $f_{initial} = 1200$ MPa, losses $= 240$ MPa (hence $f_{pe} = 960$ MPa).

Reference texts. CSA S16 Design of Steel Structures with the CISC Handbook of Steel Construction — plate girders (Cl. 14), lateral–torsional buckling (Cl. 13.6), plastic design (Cl. 8.6, 13.7), beam-columns (Cl. 13.8), composite beams (Cl. 17), connections (Cl. 21); CSA A23.3 Design of Concrete Structures — flexure and shear (Cl. 10, 11), slenderness (Cl. 10.13–10.16), footings (Cl. 15), prestressed concrete (Cl. 18); NBCC for load combinations; C. G. Salmon, J. E. Johnson & F. A. Malhas, Steel Structures: Design and Behavior; J. G. MacGregor & J. K. Wight, Reinforced Concrete: Mechanics and Design; T. Y. Lin & N. H. Burns, Design of Prestressed Concrete Structures; L. S. Beedle, Plastic Design of Steel Frames.

Check: load factors. The paper states only that the printed loads are unfactored, and gives no dead/live split. Every question below therefore treats each printed concentrated load as specified live load and factors it by $\alpha_L = 1.5$ (NBCC principal case $1.25D + 1.5L$); member self-weight, wherever it matters, is estimated from the trial section and factored at $1.25$. A candidate assuming a different split would obtain proportionally different sizes; the method is what is examined.

Check: section properties. All steel sections selected below are quoted by their plate dimensions (flange $b \times t$, web $h \times w$) and every property — $A$, $I_x$, $I_y$, $Z$, $J$, $C_w$, $r_x$, $r_y$ — is computed from those dimensions with root fillets neglected (slightly conservative). This makes every line checkable without a handbook; a rolled shape of equal or greater properties may be substituted directly.

Check: reading of Figures 3 and 4. On the examination drawing the dimension chain under Figure 3 reads 3 m + 4 m + 7 m + 4 m, and the overall dimension reads 15 m. Reading the drawing directly resolves this: the 15 m dimension line spans B to C ($4 + 7 + 4 = 15$ m) and the 3 m is a cantilever overhang projecting beyond support B to the free end A, which carries the 80 kN load. Similarly in Figure 4 the 10.5 m is the overall width of the floor ($3 \times 3.5$ m beam spacing), not a span; the design span is the 15 m stated in the note. Both readings are self-consistent and are used throughout.

Check: support conditions in Figure 2. The frame drawing shows identical triangle-and-roller symbols at A and D, and the frame must resist the 80 kN horizontal load, so both bases are taken as pinned. The frame is then statically indeterminate to the first degree, which is the classical form of this problem for both the elastic (Questions 2, 3) and the plastic (Questions 5, 6) treatments.

Q1 girder 250×18 / 900×10d = 936 mmQ5–Q6 frame 340×22 / 700×14d = 744 mmQ7 floor beam 260×22 / 650×12d = 694 mm
The three welded I-sections selected in this paper, drawn to a common scale.

Question 5: Plastic design of the steel frame, and the welded corner at B (12 + 8 = 20 marks)

Question text not reproduced: the examination questions are © Engineers and Geoscientists BC. Open the official past paper (linked at the top of this page) to read the question, then follow the worked solution below.

Given. The design starts from the same pinned-base portal of Figure 2, now in steel of $F_y = 350$ MPa, with a single plastic moment capacity $M_p$ common to beam and columns.

Given data
QuantitySymbolValue
Factored horizontal load at B$H_f$$1.5 \times 80 = 120$ kN
Factored vertical load at mid-span$P_f$$1.5 \times 500 = 750$ kN
Factored vertical loads at B, C—900 kN each (over the columns)
Frame height / span$h$ / $L$10 m / 15 m
Bases—Pinned at A and D (no base hinges)

Find. The plastic moment required by the governing collapse mechanism, a member section that provides it while remaining Class 1, and the details of the welded knee at B.

BEC120 kN750 kNCombined mechanism — the hinge at B cancels; hinges remain at E and CGrey dashed = undeformed frame; red = collapse configuration (displacements exaggerated)AD
The governing combined mechanism. Because the bases are pinned, plastic hinges can form only at B, E and C, and in the combined mechanism the hinge at B cancels.

Approach. Enumerate the independent mechanisms and their combination by the work equation, take the largest $M_p$, select plates that give the required $Z$ and remain Class 1 with the column axial load present, reduce $M_p$ for that axial load, then size the panel-zone stiffening at the knee.

  1. Note which loads do work. The 900 kN loads act at B and C, directly over the columns. In a beam mechanism those joints do not move vertically, and in a sway mechanism they move only horizontally, so neither load does external work in any mechanism. They matter only as column axial force. Only the 750 kN mid-span load, the 120 kN horizontal load and the beam self-weight enter the work equations.
  2. Beam mechanism. Hinges at B, E and C with beam rotation $\theta$ give an internal work of $4M_p\theta$ and an external work of $P_f(L/2)\theta + w_fL^2\theta/4$. With a trial factored self-weight $w_f = 2.383$ kN/m, $$M_p = \frac{750(7.5) + 2.383(15)^2/4}{4} = 1439.8\ \text{kN}\cdot\text{m}.$$
  3. Sway mechanism. With pinned bases the columns rotate about A and D, so hinges form only at B and C: $$M_p = \frac{H_f h}{2} = \frac{120(10)}{2} = 600.0\ \text{kN}\cdot\text{m}.$$
  4. Combined mechanism. Adding the two and cancelling the hinge at B, where the rotations oppose, removes $2M_p\theta$ of internal work while both external works are retained: $$M_p = \frac{750(7.5) + 2.383(15)^2/4 + 120(10)}{6 - 2} = \boxed{1739.8\ \text{kN}\cdot\text{m}}$$ This is the largest of the three and therefore governs. A statical check confirms it is admissible: $H_D = M_p/h = 174.0$ kN, so $H_A = 120 - 174.0 = -54.0$ kN and the moment at B is $|M_B| = 539.8$ kN·m, safely below $M_p$.
  5. Select the section. The required plastic modulus is $Z_{req} = M_p/(\phi F_y) = 5.52 \times 10^6$ mm³. Take a welded I-section with flanges $340 \times 22$ mm and a web $700 \times 14$ mm, $d = 744$ mm, giving $$A = 24\,760\ \text{mm}^2, \quad Z = 7.116 \times 10^6\ \text{mm}^3, \quad M_r = \phi Z F_y = \boxed{2241\ \text{kN}\cdot\text{m}} \; > \; 1739.8.$$ Flange projection $b_{el}/t = 163/22 = 7.41 \le 145/\sqrt{F_y} = 7.75$, and web $h/w = 50.0$ against the Class 1 limit for combined flexure and compression, $\left(1100/\sqrt{F_y}\right)\!\left(1 - 0.65C_f/\phi C_y\right) = 51.9$. The section is Class 1 with the column axial load present, as plastic design requires.
  6. Reduce $M_p$ for column axial load. The collapse statics give beam shears of 312.9 kN at B and 472.9 kN at C, so the columns carry $C_f = 1236.7$ kN (AB) and $1396.7$ kN (CD). With $C_y = AF_y = 8666$ kN, $$M_{pc} = 1.18M_p\left(1 - \frac{C_f}{C_y}\right) = 1.18(2241)\left(1 - 0.161\right) = 2219\ \text{kN}\cdot\text{m} \; > \; 1739.8\ \text{kN}\cdot\text{m},$$ so the reduced capacity is still adequate.
  7. Fix the bracing required by the hinges. CSA S16 Cl. 13.7 limits the unbraced length adjacent to a plastic hinge. For the beam segment next to the mid-span hinge, $\kappa = -539.8/1739.8 = -0.31$ and $$L_{cr} = \frac{25\,000 + 15\,000\kappa}{F_y}\,r_y = \frac{20\,350}{350}(76.3) = 4437\ \text{mm};$$ for the column hinge, $\kappa = 0$ gives $L_{cr} = 5452$ mm. Bracing "at load locations" alone would leave 7.5 m in the beam and 10 m in the columns, which is not enough. Provide additional lateral bracing at the quarter points of BC (3.75 m) and at the third points of each column (3.33 m). This is a real design consequence of choosing plastic design, and the paper's bracing note does not remove it.
  8. (b) Design the welded knee at B. The corner must develop the full $M_p$ of the members. The horizontal shear in the connection panel is $$V_{pz} = \frac{M_p}{d - t_f} = \frac{1739.8 \times 10^6}{744 - 22} = 2410\ \text{kN},$$ whereas the panel web alone resists $V_r = \phi(0.66F_y)d_cw = 0.90(231)(744)(14) = 2165$ kN. The shortfall of 245 kN must be carried by a diagonal stiffener at $45^\circ$: $$A_{st} \ge \frac{V_{pz} - V_r}{\phi F_y\cos\alpha} = \frac{245 \times 10^3}{0.90(350)(0.707)} = \boxed{1096\ \text{mm}^2}$$ Provide a pair of $10 \times 80$ mm diagonal plates (1600 mm², $b/t = 8 \le 200/\sqrt{F_y} = 10.7$).
  9. Complete the corner detail. The beam flange delivers $340(22)(350) = 2618$ kN into the column, so provide 22 mm horizontal continuity plates opposite both beam flanges, fitted and welded to the column web and flanges. Connect the beam flanges to the column with complete-joint-penetration groove welds using matching electrodes and run-off tabs, and the beam web with a double fillet weld sized for the web shear plus its share of the moment. Because a plastic hinge may form immediately adjacent to the joint, the welds must develop the member rather than merely the applied force, and the joint region must be laterally braced.
CJP groove welds at both beam flanges2 − 10 × 80 diagonal stiffeners22 mm continuity platescolumn ABbeam BCPanel-zone shear 2410 kN > web resistance 2165 kN → diagonal stiffener needed
The welded knee at B: diagonal panel stiffener, continuity plates and CJP flange welds.
Question 5 — final results
ItemResult
Beam mechanism$M_p = 1439.8$ kN·m
Sway mechanism$M_p = 600.0$ kN·m
Combined mechanism (governs)$M_p = 1739.8$ kN·m
Section selectedWelded I: flanges $340 \times 22$, web $700 \times 14$, $d = 744$ mm (194 kg/m)
Resistance$M_r = 2241$ kN·m; $M_{pc} = 2219$ kN·m with $C_f = 1397$ kN  ✓
ClassClass 1 with axial load ($h/w = 50.0 \le 51.9$)
Hinge bracingBeam at 3.75 m, columns at 3.33 m ($L_{cr} = 4437$ / 5452 mm)
Knee at B$2 - 10 \times 80$ mm diagonal stiffeners (1600 > 1096 mm²), 22 mm continuity plates, CJP flange welds