22-Agric-A2 Soil Physics and Mechanics · December 2013
Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)
Paper format. 04-Agric-A2 Soil Physics & Mechanics, National Exams December 2013 — a three-hour open-book examination; any non-communicating calculator is permitted. The cover page states that five (5) questions constitute a complete exam paper and that only the first five as they appear in the answer book are marked, that each question is of equal value, and that some questions require a written answer whose clarity and organization matter for marks. All seven printed questions are worked here, because the set is a study resource rather than a timed attempt; on exam day a candidate submits only the first five, in order.
Reference texts. B.M. Das, Principles of Geotechnical Engineering, 9th ed. (weight-volume relationships, permeability, effective stress, compaction); R.F. Craig, Craig's Soil Mechanics, 9th ed. (seepage, effective stress, shear strength, consolidation); G.O. Schwab et al., Soil and Water Conservation Engineering, 5th ed. (drainage, infiltration, dewatering design); USDA NRCS National Engineering Handbook (field methods for hydraulic conductivity and infiltration).
Question text not reproduced: the examination questions are © Engineers and Geoscientists BC. Open the official past paper (linked at the top of this page) to read the question, then follow the worked solution below.
Given.
| Quantity | Value |
|---|---|
| Cylinder (from Q2): diameter, length | 0.50 m, soil length L = 1.0 m |
| Tailwater bath depth | 0.10 m above the cylinder base |
| Constant water column above the soil | 0.76 m |
| Volume collected | 865 L over 10 min |
| Porosity (from Q2) | n = 33.4% |
Find. The seepage velocity (a) and the saturated hydraulic conductivity (b).
Approach. Get the Darcy (superficial) velocity from the measured flow rate and the cylinder's cross-section, divide by porosity for the true seepage velocity, then apply Darcy's law with the hydraulic gradient set by the total head drop from the constant supply level down to the tailwater level in the base bath.
c) Other methods for in-situ K. Laboratory: falling-head permeameter (better suited to finer, lower-K soils than the constant-head test used here), and back-calculation of k from a consolidation (oedometer) test's coefficient of consolidation cv. Field: pumping (aquifer) tests with observation wells, single-well slug or bail tests, the auger-hole method, borehole packer (falling/constant-head) tests, piezometer (Hvorslev) tests, and the Guelph permeameter for near-surface unsaturated/vadose-zone conductivity.
d) Soil characteristics affecting K. Grain-size distribution and effective particle size (D10), void ratio/porosity and pore connectivity, soil fabric and structure (macropores, fissures, layering/anisotropy), degree of saturation, particle shape and packing, clay mineralogy and dispersion, and permeant fluid properties (viscosity, temperature).
| Quantity | Value |
|---|---|
| Flow rate, Q | 1.44×10-3 m³/s (1.44 L/s) |
| Darcy velocity, v | 7.34×10-3 m/s |
| Seepage velocity, vs | 0.0220 m/s (22.0 mm/s) |
| Hydraulic gradient, i | 1.66 |
| Saturated hydraulic conductivity, K | 4.42×10-3 m/s |