22-Agric-A2 Soil Physics and Mechanics · December 2013
Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)
Paper format. 04-Agric-A2 Soil Physics & Mechanics, National Exams December 2013 — a three-hour open-book examination; any non-communicating calculator is permitted. The cover page states that five (5) questions constitute a complete exam paper and that only the first five as they appear in the answer book are marked, that each question is of equal value, and that some questions require a written answer whose clarity and organization matter for marks. All seven printed questions are worked here, because the set is a study resource rather than a timed attempt; on exam day a candidate submits only the first five, in order.
Reference texts. B.M. Das, Principles of Geotechnical Engineering, 9th ed. (weight-volume relationships, permeability, effective stress, compaction); R.F. Craig, Craig's Soil Mechanics, 9th ed. (seepage, effective stress, shear strength, consolidation); G.O. Schwab et al., Soil and Water Conservation Engineering, 5th ed. (drainage, infiltration, dewatering design); USDA NRCS National Engineering Handbook (field methods for hydraulic conductivity and infiltration).
Question text not reproduced: the examination questions are © Engineers and Geoscientists BC. Open the official past paper (linked at the top of this page) to read the question, then follow the worked solution below.
Given.
| Quantity | Value |
|---|---|
| Particle specific gravity, Gs | 2.60 |
| Compaction curve peak (from figure) | γd,max ≈ 19.1 kN/m³ at w ≈ 11% |
| Point of interest (from figure) | w = 10%, γd ≈ 19.0 kN/m³ |
Find. (a) the zero-air-voids curve to plot alongside the compaction curve; (b) the percentage of void volume occupied by air at w = 10%; (c) the practical effects of compaction.
Approach. The zero-air-voids (saturation) line gives the maximum possible dry unit weight at each moisture content (S = 100%, no air in the voids); plot it from γzav = Gsγw/(1+wGs) and compare it with the actual compacted point to get the void ratio, degree of saturation, and hence the air content at w = 10%.
c) Effects of compaction. Hydraulic: compaction collapses macropores and reduces the void ratio, which sharply lowers saturated hydraulic conductivity and infiltration capacity — useful for a liner or subgrade, but it also increases surface runoff. Structural: the denser, better-interlocked particle arrangement raises shear strength, stiffness (modulus) and bearing capacity, and reduces post-construction settlement (compressibility) — the entire purpose of specifying a target relative compaction (e.g. 95% of Proctor maximum) for engineered fill. Erosive: the denser surface is more resistant to particle detachment and piping, but because infiltration is suppressed, more rainfall converts to surface runoff, which can increase erosive shear stress at the surface and on downslope, un-compacted ground unless drainage is specifically managed.
| Quantity | Value |
|---|---|
| γzav at w = 10% | 20.24 kN/m³ |
| γzav at w = 11% | 19.83 kN/m³ |
| Void ratio at w = 10% (γd = 19.0) | e = 0.342 |
| Degree of saturation at w = 10% | S = 75.9% |
| Air content, % of void volume | 24.1% |