NivaarExam PrepOfficial exam papers ↗

22-Agric-A2 Soil Physics and Mechanics · December 2013

Question 6 of 7: Standard Proctor Compaction — Zero-Air-Voids Line and Air Content

Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)

Notes on this paper

Paper format. 04-Agric-A2 Soil Physics & Mechanics, National Exams December 2013 — a three-hour open-book examination; any non-communicating calculator is permitted. The cover page states that five (5) questions constitute a complete exam paper and that only the first five as they appear in the answer book are marked, that each question is of equal value, and that some questions require a written answer whose clarity and organization matter for marks. All seven printed questions are worked here, because the set is a study resource rather than a timed attempt; on exam day a candidate submits only the first five, in order.

Reference texts. B.M. Das, Principles of Geotechnical Engineering, 9th ed. (weight-volume relationships, permeability, effective stress, compaction); R.F. Craig, Craig's Soil Mechanics, 9th ed. (seepage, effective stress, shear strength, consolidation); G.O. Schwab et al., Soil and Water Conservation Engineering, 5th ed. (drainage, infiltration, dewatering design); USDA NRCS National Engineering Handbook (field methods for hydraulic conductivity and infiltration).

Question 6: Standard Proctor Compaction — Zero-Air-Voids Line and Air Content (20 marks)

Question text not reproduced: the examination questions are © Engineers and Geoscientists BC. Open the official past paper (linked at the top of this page) to read the question, then follow the worked solution below.

Given.

QuantityValue
Particle specific gravity, Gs2.60
Compaction curve peak (from figure)γd,max ≈ 19.1 kN/m³ at w ≈ 11%
Point of interest (from figure)w = 10%, γd ≈ 19.0 kN/m³

Find. (a) the zero-air-voids curve to plot alongside the compaction curve; (b) the percentage of void volume occupied by air at w = 10%; (c) the practical effects of compaction.

Approach. The zero-air-voids (saturation) line gives the maximum possible dry unit weight at each moisture content (S = 100%, no air in the voids); plot it from γzav = Gsγw/(1+wGs) and compare it with the actual compacted point to get the void ratio, degree of saturation, and hence the air content at w = 10%.

5791113151617181920Moisture content, %Dry unit weight, kN/m³Zero-air-voids lineγd,max = 19.1 @ w = 11%w = 10%, γd = 19.0
Standard Proctor curve (blue) with the zero-air-voids line (red dashed, Gs = 2.60) plotted alongside it — the ZAV line always lies above and to the right of an achievable compaction curve, since S < 100% at every compacted point.
  1. a) Zero-air-voids line. At any moisture content w (decimal), the maximum possible dry unit weight with zero air voids is $$\gamma_{zav}(w) = \frac{G_s\gamma_w}{1+wG_s}$$ Evaluated at w = 10% and 11% (bracketing the peak) with γw = 9.81 kN/m³: $$\gamma_{zav}(0.10) = \frac{2.60(9.81)}{1+0.10(2.60)} = \boxed{20.24\ \text{kN/m}^3}, \qquad \gamma_{zav}(0.11) = \frac{2.60(9.81)}{1+0.11(2.60)} = 19.83\ \text{kN/m}^3$$ Plotted across the moisture range, this curve lies everywhere above the compaction curve (shown in the figure), as it must — no compacted point can exceed the density a fully saturated sample of the same soil would have.
  2. b) % of void volume filled with air, w = 10%. From the actual point on the curve, γd = 19.0 kN/m³ at w = 10%, the void ratio follows from Gsγw/γd = 1 + e: $$e = \frac{G_s\gamma_w}{\gamma_d}-1 = \frac{2.60(9.81)}{19.0}-1 = 0.342$$ The degree of saturation actually achieved, S = wGs/e, and the fraction of the void volume that is not water is air: $$S = \frac{wG_s}{e} = \frac{0.10(2.60)}{0.342} = 0.759\ (75.9\%)$$ $$\text{air, \% of void volume} = (1-S)\times100\% = \boxed{24.1\%}$$ (Equivalently, as a fraction of the total sample volume rather than of the void volume alone, the air content is n(1−S) ≈ 6.1%.)

c) Effects of compaction. Hydraulic: compaction collapses macropores and reduces the void ratio, which sharply lowers saturated hydraulic conductivity and infiltration capacity — useful for a liner or subgrade, but it also increases surface runoff. Structural: the denser, better-interlocked particle arrangement raises shear strength, stiffness (modulus) and bearing capacity, and reduces post-construction settlement (compressibility) — the entire purpose of specifying a target relative compaction (e.g. 95% of Proctor maximum) for engineered fill. Erosive: the denser surface is more resistant to particle detachment and piping, but because infiltration is suppressed, more rainfall converts to surface runoff, which can increase erosive shear stress at the surface and on downslope, un-compacted ground unless drainage is specifically managed.

QuantityValue
γzav at w = 10%20.24 kN/m³
γzav at w = 11%19.83 kN/m³
Void ratio at w = 10% (γd = 19.0)e = 0.342
Degree of saturation at w = 10%S = 75.9%
Air content, % of void volume24.1%