22-Agric-A7 Chemistry and Microbiology of Foods · May 2017
Question 2 of 12: Rate Equation for Sensory Quality Loss in Frozen Beef
Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)
Notes on this paper
Paper format. 04-Agric-A7 Chemistry and Microbiology of Foods,
National Exams May 2017 — a three-hour closed-book exam (one aid sheet,
both sides; approved calculator permitted). The paper is in two sections: Section I (Food
Chemistry, Questions 1–6) and Section II (Food Microbiology, Questions 7–12);
candidates answer any three questions from each section for a 100-mark paper (each question
worth 16.7 marks). All twelve questions are worked here so the set is a complete study
resource.
Reference texts. S. Damodaran, K.L. Parkin and O.R. Fennema (eds.),
Fennema's Food Chemistry, 5th ed. (enzyme kinetics, water activity and sorption
isotherms, lipid crystallization/polymorphism, protein gelation, popcorn starch/glass
transition); R.P. Singh and D.R. Heldman, Introduction to Food Engineering, 5th ed.
(reaction-order kinetics, quality-loss modelling); J.M. Steffe, Rheological Methods in Food
Process Engineering, 2nd ed. (creep-recovery of viscoelastic doughs); J. Jay, M. Loessner
and D. Golden, Modern Food Microbiology, 7th ed. (bacterial growth curve, intrinsic/
extrinsic factors, Salmonella, quorum sensing, viral/prion foodborne agents, rapid
methods, sampling plans); C. Mortimore and C. Wallace, HACCP: A Practical Approach,
3rd ed. (the seven HACCP principles).
Section I — Food Chemistry
Question 2: Rate Equation for Sensory Quality Loss in Frozen Beef (16.7 marks)
Given. Sensory quality score $Q$ vs. storage time $t$ at $-23\,{}^{\circ}\text{C}$:
Given data — sensory score during frozen storage
$t$ (months)
$Q$ (score)
0
8.4
3
6.2
6
5.5
9
5.1
Find. Which order best represents the quality loss, and the corresponding
rate constant.
Approach. Test the three candidate transforms that turn each order into a
straight line on graph paper — $Q$ vs. $t$ (zero order, plain paper), $\ln Q$ vs. $t$
(first order, semi-log paper), and $1/Q$ vs. $t$ (second order) — and pick the one that is
both the best straight line and matches the deteriorative-quality convention used for frozen
foods.
Linear regression of each transform. Least-squares fits give:
zero order $R^2=0.864$; first order (semi-log) $R^2=0.903$; second order (reciprocal)
$R^2=0.938$. The first- and second-order fits are both visibly straighter than the zero-order
plot; sensory/organoleptic quality loss in frozen storage is conventionally modelled as
first-order decay of the quality attribute (Singh & Heldman), and the semi-log fit here is
solidly linear, so the first-order model is adopted.
Fit the first-order line. With $\ln Q = \ln Q_0 - kt$, the regression gives
intercept $\ln Q_0 = 2.064$ and slope $-k=-0.0539\ \text{month}^{-1}$, i.e.
$$Q_0 = e^{2.064} = \boxed{7.88}, \qquad k = \boxed{0.0539\ \text{month}^{-1}}.$$
Report the rate equation and a useful derived quantity. The fitted quality
function is
$$Q(t) = 7.88\,e^{-0.0539t}\quad(t\text{ in months}),$$
with a corresponding score half-life $t_{1/2}=\ln 2/k = \boxed{12.9\ \text{months}}$ — the
time for the sensory score to fall to half its initial value.
Semi-log plot of sensory score vs. storage time: the four measured scores
(red) fall close to the fitted first-order line (blue), $\ln Q = 2.064-0.0539t$.