Question 3 of 9: Two-Stage Compression Refrigeration with Flash Chamber (R-134a)
Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)
Notes on this paper
National Exam 04-BS-10, Thermodynamics — December 2017. 3 hours, Closed-Book Exam (approved
calculator and one double-sided 8.5x11-inch aid sheet permitted; property tables and charts supplied
in an appendix, interpolation not required). Part A: answer 2 of Questions 1-3 (20 marks each). Part
B: answer 4 of Questions 4-9 (15 marks each), for a 100-mark paper. Only the first two Part-A and
first four Part-B questions as they appear in the answer book are marked. All nine questions (Part A
complete, Part B complete) are solved below for completeness.
Reference texts: Cengel & Boles, Thermodynamics: An Engineering
Approach, 8th ed.; Moran, Shapiro, Boettner & Bailey, Fundamentals of Engineering
Thermodynamics, 8th ed. All state properties (water/steam, R-134a, air, N₂, CO₂,
H₂) were computed from high-accuracy equations of state in place of printed property-table interpolation; every boxed numeric result.
Given. R-134a two-stage compression, evaporator pressure $P_{evap}=0.14$ MPa,
flash-chamber pressure $P_{mid}=0.5$ MPa, condenser pressure $P_{cond}=1.0$ MPa. Compressor I (LP)
discharges directly into the flash chamber; the flash chamber's saturated-vapor outlet feeds
Compressor II (HP); its saturated-liquid outlet is throttled to the evaporator. Both compressors have
isentropic efficiency $\eta_c=0.90$. Condenser (= high-side) mass flow rate $\dot m_{high}=0.25$ kg/s.
Evaporator exit is saturated vapor; condenser exit is saturated liquid.
Fig. Q3 — T–s state points for the two-stage R-134a cycle with
flash chamber (2→3 mixing at the flash chamber and 6→7 liquid/vapor separation are drawn
as straight connectors rather than single-stream process lines; 5→6 and 7→8 are irreversible
isenthalpic throttling).
Approach
Fix states 1 and 3(g) from the given saturation pressures, compress each stage with the stated
isentropic efficiency to get the actual states 2 and 4, then close the flash chamber with a combined
mass-and-energy balance to solve for the low-side (evaporator) mass flow rate from the given high-side
(condenser) flow rate. Evaporator duty and COP follow; part (d) reads the actual (irreversible)
entropy rise directly off each compressor's inlet/outlet state.
Fix states 1 and 3(g) (saturation). State 1, saturated vapor at 0.14 MPa
($-18.76\ ^\circ$C): $h_1=387.32$ kJ/kg, $s_1=1.7402$ kJ/kg·K. State 3, saturated vapor at
0.5 MPa: $h_{3}=h_g=407.47$ kJ/kg, $s_g=1.7197$ kJ/kg·K.
Compressor I (1→2), actual. Isentropic exit at 0.5 MPa with $s=s_1$:
$h_{2s}=413.47$ kJ/kg. Actual: $h_2=h_1+(h_{2s}-h_1)/\eta_c=387.32+(413.47-387.32)/0.90=416.37$
kJ/kg, with actual exit entropy $s_2=1.7500$ kJ/kg·K (read off the real-fluid EOS at
$P_{mid}$, $h_2$).
Compressor II (3→4), actual. Isentropic exit at 1.0 MPa with $s=s_g$:
$h_{4s}=421.80$ kJ/kg. Actual: $h_4=h_g+(h_{4s}-h_g)/\eta_c=407.47+(421.80-407.47)/0.90=423.40$
kJ/kg, with actual exit entropy $s_4=1.7247$ kJ/kg·K.
Condenser and flash-chamber liquid states. Condenser exit, saturated liquid at
1.0 MPa: $h_5=255.50$ kJ/kg; throttling 5→6 into the flash chamber is isenthalpic, $h_6=h_5$.
Flash-chamber liquid, saturated liquid at 0.5 MPa: $h_7=h_f=221.50$ kJ/kg.
Flash-chamber energy balance ⇒ evaporator mass flow rate (part a). The
flash chamber receives Compressor-I's discharge ($\dot m_{evap}$ at $h_2$) and the throttled
condenser liquid ($\dot m_{high}$ at $h_6$), and delivers saturated vapor to Compressor II
($\dot m_{high}$ at $h_g$) and saturated liquid to the evaporator's expansion valve ($\dot m_{evap}$
at $h_f$):
$$\dot m_{evap}\,h_2+\dot m_{high}\,h_6=\dot m_{high}\,h_g+\dot m_{evap}\,h_f$$
$$\dot m_{evap}=\dot m_{high}\,\frac{h_g-h_6}{h_2-h_f}=0.25\times\frac{407.47-255.50}{416.37-221.50}=\boxed{0.19497\ \text{kg/s}}.$$
Evaporator heat removal (part b). After the second throttle (7→8),
$h_8=h_7=221.50$ kJ/kg:
$$\dot Q_{evap}=\dot m_{evap}(h_1-h_8)=0.19497\times(387.32-221.50)=\boxed{32.33\ \text{kJ/s}}.$$
Entropy increase in both compressors (part d). Since each compressor is
adiabatic (no heat exchange with the surroundings), the actual entropy rise across it equals its
own entropy generation. Compressor I: $\Delta s_I=s_2-s_1=1.75002-1.74023=0.00980$
kJ/kg·K, at $\dot m_{evap}$. Compressor II: $\Delta s_{II}=s_4-s_g=1.72474-1.71969=0.00505$
kJ/kg·K, at $\dot m_{high}$.
$$\dot S_{gen,I}=\dot m_{evap}\,\Delta s_I=0.19497\times0.00980=\boxed{0.00191\ \text{kW/K}}.$$
$$\dot S_{gen,II}=\dot m_{high}\,\Delta s_{II}=0.25\times0.00505=\boxed{0.00126\ \text{kW/K}}.$$
Both are strictly positive, consistent with the second law for an irreversible (90%-efficient)
adiabatic compression.