Question 5 of 9: Adiabatic Nozzle, Variable Specific Heats
Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)
Notes on this paper
National Exam 04-BS-10, Thermodynamics — December 2017. 3 hours, Closed-Book Exam (approved
calculator and one double-sided 8.5x11-inch aid sheet permitted; property tables and charts supplied
in an appendix, interpolation not required). Part A: answer 2 of Questions 1-3 (20 marks each). Part
B: answer 4 of Questions 4-9 (15 marks each), for a 100-mark paper. Only the first two Part-A and
first four Part-B questions as they appear in the answer book are marked. All nine questions (Part A
complete, Part B complete) are solved below for completeness.
Reference texts: Cengel & Boles, Thermodynamics: An Engineering
Approach, 8th ed.; Moran, Shapiro, Boettner & Bailey, Fundamentals of Engineering
Thermodynamics, 8th ed. All state properties (water/steam, R-134a, air, N₂, CO₂,
H₂) were computed from high-accuracy equations of state in place of printed property-table interpolation; every boxed numeric result.
Question 5: Adiabatic Nozzle, Variable Specific Heats (15 marks)
Fig. Q5 — T–s sketch of the nozzle expansion. The dashed line
1→2s is the (unattainable) isentropic path; the solid line 1→2 is the actual 90%-efficient
path, landing at higher entropy and higher enthalpy (hence higher exit temperature) than the
isentropic case.
Approach
Solve the isentropic exit temperature $T_{2s}$ by root-finding the variable-cp isentropic
condition at the given pressure ratio, take 90% of the resulting isentropic enthalpy drop as the
actual kinetic-energy gain (nozzle isentropic efficiency is defined on enthalpy drop, i.e. kinetic
energy, not temperature), then back out the actual exit temperature from the actual exit
enthalpy.
Actual kinetic energy gain and exit velocity (part a). Nozzle isentropic
efficiency is defined as the ratio of actual to isentropic kinetic-energy gain (enthalpy drop),
with negligible inlet velocity:
$$\Delta h_a=\eta_n\,\Delta h_s=0.90\times236.03=\boxed{212.42\ \text{kJ/kg}}.$$
$$V_2=\sqrt{2\,\Delta h_a}=\sqrt{2\times212{,}423\ \text{J/kg}}=\boxed{651.80\ \text{m/s}}.$$
Actual exit enthalpy and temperature (part b).
$$h_2=h_1-\Delta h_a=1149.91-212.42=937.48\ \text{kJ/kg}.$$
Root-solving $h(T_2)=937.48$ kJ/kg gives
$$T_2=790.05\ \text{K}=\boxed{516.90\ ^\circ\text{C}}.$$
As expected, the actual exit temperature is higher than the isentropic value (516.90°C vs
495.32°C): the irreversibility inside the nozzle converts some of the kinetic-energy gain back
into internal energy (friction/turbulence), so less enthalpy converts to velocity and more remains
as sensible heat.