NivaarExam PrepOfficial exam papers ↗

04-BS-2 · December 2018

Question 5 of 8: Confidence Intervals and Hypothesis Tests — Brinell Hardness

Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)

Notes on this paper

National Examinations December 2018 — 04-BS-2, Probability and Statistics, 2 hours, closed book except one hand-written information sheet and an approved calculator. Any 5 of 8 questions constitute a complete paper; all 8 are solved below.

Reference texts: Walpole, Myers, Myers & Ye, Probability & Statistics for Engineers and Scientists (Pearson) — used throughout for distribution theory, estimation and hypothesis-testing formulas.

Question 5: Confidence Intervals and Hypothesis Tests — Brinell Hardness (20 marks)

Question text not reproduced: the examination questions are © Engineers and Geoscientists BC. Open the official past paper (linked at the top of this page) to read the question, then follow the worked solution below.

Given.

Given data
QuantityValue
ΣX1,800.0
ΣX²129,654.0
n25

Find. (a) 99% CI for the true mean and true σ. (b) Test H₀: μ=74.0 at α=0.05. (c) Test H₀: σ=1.2 at α=0.05.

Approach. Compute the sample mean and variance from the raw sums, then use the t-distribution (unknown σ) for the mean interval/test and the χ² distribution for the variance/sd interval/test, all with df = n−1 = 24.

  1. Sample statistics. $$\bar x=\dfrac{\Sigma X}{n}=\dfrac{1800.0}{25}=72.0,\qquad s^2=\dfrac{\Sigma X^2-(\Sigma X)^2/n}{n-1}=\dfrac{129654.0-1800.0^2/25}{24}=\dfrac{54.0}{24}$$ $$\boxed{\bar x=72.0,\quad s^2=2.25\ (s=1.5)}$$
  2. (a)(i) 99% CI for the true mean. Unknown σ, use $t_{0.005,24}=2.797$ (Appendix 2): $$\bar x\pm t_{0.005,24}\dfrac{s}{\sqrt n}=72.0\pm2.797\dfrac{1.5}{\sqrt{25}}=72.0\pm0.839$$ $$\boxed{71.161\lt \mu\lt 72.839}$$
  3. (a)(ii) 99% CI for the true standard deviation. With df=24, $\chi^2_{0.995,24}=9.89$ and $\chi^2_{0.005,24}=45.55$ (Appendix 3): $$\dfrac{(n-1)s^2}{\chi^2_{0.005,24}}\lt \sigma^2\lt \dfrac{(n-1)s^2}{\chi^2_{0.995,24}} \ \Rightarrow\ \dfrac{54.0}{45.55}\lt \sigma^2\lt \dfrac{54.0}{9.89}$$ i.e. $1.185\lt \sigma^2\lt 5.460$; taking square roots: $$\boxed{1.089\lt \sigma\lt 2.337}$$
  4. (b) Test H₀: μ=74.0 vs H₁: μ≠74.0, α=0.05. σ unknown → t-test, df=24: $$t=\dfrac{\bar x-74.0}{s/\sqrt n}=\dfrac{72.0-74.0}{1.5/5}=\dfrac{-2.0}{0.3}=-6.667$$ Critical value $t_{0.025,24}=2.064$ (two-tailed). Since $|t|=6.667\gt 2.064$: $$\boxed{\text{Reject }H_0\text{ -- the mean is significantly different from 74.0}}$$
  5. (c) Test H₀: σ=1.2 vs H₁: σ≠1.2, α=0.05. $$\chi^2=\dfrac{(n-1)s^2}{\sigma_0^2}=\dfrac{24(2.25)}{1.2^2}=\dfrac{54.0}{1.44}=37.5$$ Critical values (df=24, two-tailed): $\chi^2_{0.975,24}=12.40$ and $\chi^2_{0.025,24}=39.36$. Since $12.40\lt 37.5\lt 39.36$: $$\boxed{\text{Fail to reject }H_0\text{ -- }\sigma\text{ is not significantly different from 1.2}}$$
Question 5 — final results
PartQuantityResult
&bar;x, s²72.0, 2.25
(a)(i)99% CI for μ(71.161, 72.839)
(a)(ii)99% CI for σ(1.089, 2.337)
(b)t (H₀: μ=74.0)−6.667 → reject H₀
(c)χ² (H₀: σ=1.2)37.5 → fail to reject H₀