NivaarExam PrepOfficial exam papers ↗

20-Bio-A5 Systems Analysis & Control · December 2017

Question 6 of 6: Batch, Chemostat, and Fed-Batch Culture Kinetics Compared

Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)

Notes on this paper

National Exams / EGBC — December 2017 — 04-Bio-A5 Enzyme and Microbial Kinetics. Three-hour open-book examination; any non-communicating calculator is permitted. Six questions constitute a complete paper. Content spans quasi-steady-state derivation of a two-site enzyme mechanism, inhibition kinetics fitted from experimental rate data, immobilized-enzyme deactivation in a batch reactor, elemental-balance stoichiometry of aerobic biomass growth, a continuous fermentation with cell recycle, and a batch/chemostat/fed-batch culture-kinetics comparison.

Reference texts: Bailey & Ollis, Biochemical Engineering Fundamentals (2nd ed.) — enzyme kinetics and inhibition, immobilized-enzyme deactivation, stoichiometry of microbial growth, continuous culture with cell recycle, batch/chemostat/fed-batch kinetics. All quantities are used exactly as printed on the exam.

Check: the printed marking scheme (page 1) lists mark weights for Questions 1–5 only (10 + 15 + 15 + 20 + 25 = 85 marks), even though instruction 3 states the paper has SIX questions and Question 6 (parts a–d) is fully printed on pages 4–5. We adopt 15 marks for Question 6 — matching Question 3's single-part weight — so the paper totals a clean 100 marks; this is the same class of front-page marking-scheme typo already documented elsewhere in this discipline, not a content gap.

Question 6: Batch, Chemostat, and Fed-Batch Culture Kinetics Compared (15 marks — a–d, assumed weight; see paper-level check note)

Question text not reproduced: the examination questions are © Engineers and Geoscientists BC. Open the official past paper (linked at the top of this page) to read the question, then follow the worked solution below.

Given.

QuantitySymbolValue
Batch reactor charge / vessel$V_0$100 L (batch and part-a chemostat basis)
Fed-batch vessel size—1000 L (part d)
Initial inoculum$X_0$1 g DCW / 100 L = 0.01 g/L
Initial glucose concentration$S_0$10 g/L
Minimum residual substrate (part a)$S_{\min}$0.01 g/L
Yield coefficient$Y_{x/s}$0.4 g DCW/g glucose
Max. specific growth rate$\mu_m$0.7 h$^{-1}$
Monod constant$K_s$0.1 g/L

Find. (a) maximum cell density and the time to reach it (after the lag phase); (b) the dilution rate giving maximum chemostat productivity; (c) how the batch and continuous volumetric production rates compare; (d) the fed-batch biomass production rate.

Approach. (a) The yield coefficient links $S$ linearly to $X$, turning the Monod batch growth ODE into a separable "logistic-type" equation solved by partial fractions. (b) The classical chemostat productivity-optimum condition ($d(DX)/dD=0$) gives a closed-form $D_{\text{opt}}$. (c) Compare the resulting volumetric rates directly. (d) Fed-batch has no outflow, so under the quasi-steady-state approximation (feed becomes the growth-limiting supply) the total biomass production rate is constant and set entirely by the feed.

  1. (a) Yield-linked substrate–biomass relation. $$S=S_0-\frac{X-X_0}{Y_{x/s}}=\frac{X_m-X}{Y_{x/s}}, \qquad X_m\equiv X_0+Y_{x/s}S_0=0.01+0.4(10)=4.01\ \text{g/L (theoretical zero-substrate maximum)}.$$
  2. Maximum cell density. At the stated minimum residual substrate $S_{\min}=0.01$ g/L: $$X_{\max}=X_0+Y_{x/s}(S_0-S_{\min})=0.01+0.4(9.99)=\boxed{4.006\ \text{g/L}}.$$
  3. Integrated Monod batch growth time. Substituting $S(X)$ into $dX/dt=\mu_mSX/(K_s+S)$ gives $dX/dt=\mu_mX(X_m-X)/\big(K_sY_{x/s}+X_m-X\big)$, which integrates by partial fractions (with $a\equiv K_sY_{x/s}=0.04$) to $$t=\frac{1}{\mu_m}\left[\frac{a+X_m}{X_m}\ln\frac{X}{X_0}+\frac{a}{X_m}\ln\frac{X_m-X_0}{X_m-X}\right].$$
  4. Evaluate at $X=X_{\max}=4.006$ g/L. $$t=\frac{1}{0.7}\left[1.010\ln\frac{4.006}{0.01}+0.00998\ln\frac{4.00}{0.004}\right]=\frac{1}{0.7}[6.053+0.069]=\boxed{8.75\ \text{h after the lag phase}}.$$
  5. (b) Chemostat productivity optimum. Maximizing volumetric productivity $D\,X(D)$ over the Monod chemostat steady state gives the classical closed-form optimum $$D_{\text{opt}}=\mu_m\left(1-\sqrt{\frac{K_s}{K_s+S_0}}\right)=0.7\left(1-\sqrt{\frac{0.1}{10.1}}\right)=\boxed{0.630\ \text{h}^{-1}}.$$
  6. (c) Batch vs. continuous volumetric production rate. Batch (whole-cycle average): $$\bar r_{\text{batch}}=\frac{X_{\max}-X_0}{t}=\frac{4.006-0.01}{8.75}=0.457\ \text{g/(L}\cdot\text{h)}.$$ Chemostat at $D_{\text{opt}}$: $S_{\text{opt}}=K_sD_{\text{opt}}/(\mu_m-D_{\text{opt}})=0.905$ g/L, $X_{\text{opt}}=Y_{x/s}(S_0-S_{\text{opt}})=3.638$ g/L, so $$r_{\text{cont}}=D_{\text{opt}}X_{\text{opt}}=0.630(3.638)=\boxed{2.29\ \text{g/(L}\cdot\text{h)}}\approx 5.0\times \bar r_{\text{batch}}.$$ The batch average is dragged down by the slow finish as $S$ crawls toward $S_{\min}$; the chemostat sustains its (lower per-cell, but continuously applied) growth rate indefinitely.
  7. (d) Fed-batch feed rate. Using the part-(b) optimum as the INITIAL dilution rate with $V_0=100$ L: $$F=D_{\text{opt}}V_0=0.630(100)=63.0\ \text{L/h},$$ held constant thereafter (so $D=F/V(t)$ falls below $D_{\text{opt}}$ as $V$ grows past 100 L in the 1000 L vessel).
  8. Fed-batch quasi-steady-state production rate. Fed-batch has no outflow, so the total-biomass balance is $d(XV)/dt=\mu XV$ (growth only). Under the fed-batch quasi-steady-state approximation, the feed itself is the growth-limiting supply — $S$ stays low and roughly constant because essentially every increment of incoming substrate is consumed almost as fast as it arrives — so $$\mu XV\approx Y_{x/s}\,F\,S_0 \quad\Rightarrow\quad \boxed{\frac{d(XV)}{dt}\approx Y_{x/s}FS_0=0.4(63.0)(10)\approx 252\ \text{g DCW/h}},$$ a constant TOTAL production rate, in contrast to the batch (whose rate collapses to near zero as $S\to S_{\min}$) and the fixed-volume chemostat (whose rate is capped by $V$).
Check: part (d) assumes the fed-batch feed is fresh medium at the same glucose concentration used throughout, $S_0=10$ g/L (not restated in the question, but the natural reading of "maintain a constant feed rate" following directly from the part-(a) setup).
ResultValue
(a) Maximum cell density $X_{\max}$4.006 g/L
(a) Time after lag phase8.75 h
(b) Optimum dilution rate $D_{\text{opt}}$0.630 h$^{-1}$
(c) Batch avg. rate / chemostat optimum rate0.457 / 2.29 g/(L·h) (≈5.0×)
(d) Fed-batch feed rate $F$63.0 L/h
(d) Fed-batch total biomass production rate≈252 g DCW/h
Back to the paper →