20-Bio-A5 Systems Analysis & Control · December 2017
Question 6 of 6: Batch, Chemostat, and Fed-Batch Culture Kinetics Compared
Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)
Notes on this paper
National Exams / EGBC — December 2017 — 04-Bio-A5 Enzyme and Microbial Kinetics. Three-hour open-book examination; any non-communicating calculator is permitted. Six questions constitute a complete paper. Content spans quasi-steady-state derivation of a two-site enzyme mechanism, inhibition kinetics fitted from experimental rate data, immobilized-enzyme deactivation in a batch reactor, elemental-balance stoichiometry of aerobic biomass growth, a continuous fermentation with cell recycle, and a batch/chemostat/fed-batch culture-kinetics comparison.
Reference texts: Bailey & Ollis, Biochemical Engineering Fundamentals (2nd ed.) — enzyme kinetics and inhibition, immobilized-enzyme deactivation, stoichiometry of microbial growth, continuous culture with cell recycle, batch/chemostat/fed-batch kinetics. All quantities are used exactly as printed on the exam.
Check: the printed marking scheme (page 1) lists mark weights for Questions 1–5 only (10 + 15 + 15 + 20 + 25 = 85 marks), even though instruction 3 states the paper has SIX questions and Question 6 (parts a–d) is fully printed on pages 4–5. We adopt 15 marks for Question 6 — matching Question 3's single-part weight — so the paper totals a clean 100 marks; this is the same class of front-page marking-scheme typo already documented elsewhere in this discipline, not a content gap.
Question 6: Batch, Chemostat, and Fed-Batch Culture Kinetics Compared (15 marks — a–d, assumed weight; see paper-level check note)
Find. (a) maximum cell density and the time to reach it (after the lag phase); (b) the dilution rate giving maximum chemostat productivity; (c) how the batch and continuous volumetric production rates compare; (d) the fed-batch biomass production rate.
Approach. (a) The yield coefficient links $S$ linearly to $X$, turning the Monod batch growth ODE into a separable "logistic-type" equation solved by partial fractions. (b) The classical chemostat productivity-optimum condition ($d(DX)/dD=0$) gives a closed-form $D_{\text{opt}}$. (c) Compare the resulting volumetric rates directly. (d) Fed-batch has no outflow, so under the quasi-steady-state approximation (feed becomes the growth-limiting supply) the total biomass production rate is constant and set entirely by the feed.
Maximum cell density. At the stated minimum residual substrate $S_{\min}=0.01$ g/L: $$X_{\max}=X_0+Y_{x/s}(S_0-S_{\min})=0.01+0.4(9.99)=\boxed{4.006\ \text{g/L}}.$$
Integrated Monod batch growth time. Substituting $S(X)$ into $dX/dt=\mu_mSX/(K_s+S)$ gives $dX/dt=\mu_mX(X_m-X)/\big(K_sY_{x/s}+X_m-X\big)$, which integrates by partial fractions (with $a\equiv K_sY_{x/s}=0.04$) to $$t=\frac{1}{\mu_m}\left[\frac{a+X_m}{X_m}\ln\frac{X}{X_0}+\frac{a}{X_m}\ln\frac{X_m-X_0}{X_m-X}\right].$$
Evaluate at $X=X_{\max}=4.006$ g/L. $$t=\frac{1}{0.7}\left[1.010\ln\frac{4.006}{0.01}+0.00998\ln\frac{4.00}{0.004}\right]=\frac{1}{0.7}[6.053+0.069]=\boxed{8.75\ \text{h after the lag phase}}.$$
(b) Chemostat productivity optimum. Maximizing volumetric productivity $D\,X(D)$ over the Monod chemostat steady state gives the classical closed-form optimum $$D_{\text{opt}}=\mu_m\left(1-\sqrt{\frac{K_s}{K_s+S_0}}\right)=0.7\left(1-\sqrt{\frac{0.1}{10.1}}\right)=\boxed{0.630\ \text{h}^{-1}}.$$
(c) Batch vs. continuous volumetric production rate. Batch (whole-cycle average): $$\bar r_{\text{batch}}=\frac{X_{\max}-X_0}{t}=\frac{4.006-0.01}{8.75}=0.457\ \text{g/(L}\cdot\text{h)}.$$ Chemostat at $D_{\text{opt}}$: $S_{\text{opt}}=K_sD_{\text{opt}}/(\mu_m-D_{\text{opt}})=0.905$ g/L, $X_{\text{opt}}=Y_{x/s}(S_0-S_{\text{opt}})=3.638$ g/L, so $$r_{\text{cont}}=D_{\text{opt}}X_{\text{opt}}=0.630(3.638)=\boxed{2.29\ \text{g/(L}\cdot\text{h)}}\approx 5.0\times \bar r_{\text{batch}}.$$ The batch average is dragged down by the slow finish as $S$ crawls toward $S_{\min}$; the chemostat sustains its (lower per-cell, but continuously applied) growth rate indefinitely.
(d) Fed-batch feed rate. Using the part-(b) optimum as the INITIAL dilution rate with $V_0=100$ L: $$F=D_{\text{opt}}V_0=0.630(100)=63.0\ \text{L/h},$$ held constant thereafter (so $D=F/V(t)$ falls below $D_{\text{opt}}$ as $V$ grows past 100 L in the 1000 L vessel).
Fed-batch quasi-steady-state production rate. Fed-batch has no outflow, so the total-biomass balance is $d(XV)/dt=\mu XV$ (growth only). Under the fed-batch quasi-steady-state approximation, the feed itself is the growth-limiting supply — $S$ stays low and roughly constant because essentially every increment of incoming substrate is consumed almost as fast as it arrives — so $$\mu XV\approx Y_{x/s}\,F\,S_0 \quad\Rightarrow\quad \boxed{\frac{d(XV)}{dt}\approx Y_{x/s}FS_0=0.4(63.0)(10)\approx 252\ \text{g DCW/h}},$$ a constant TOTAL production rate, in contrast to the batch (whose rate collapses to near zero as $S\to S_{\min}$) and the fixed-volume chemostat (whose rate is capped by $V$).
Check: part (d) assumes the fed-batch feed is fresh medium at the same glucose concentration used throughout, $S_0=10$ g/L (not restated in the question, but the natural reading of "maintain a constant feed rate" following directly from the part-(a) setup).