24-Bld-A3 Construction Engineering · Undated paper
Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)
National Examinations — 07-Bld-A3, May 2019 — Construction Engineering. Closed book; candidates may use one of the two approved calculators (Casio or Sharp). The paper prints seven questions of equal value (20 marks each) and states that any five questions constitute a complete paper, only the first five appearing in the answer book being marked. Candidates are urged to record any interpretive assumptions with their answers. All seven questions are worked below, because the set is intended as a study resource rather than as a single exam sitting.
Reference texts: Hendrickson, C. & Au, T., Project Management for Construction (2nd ed., Carnegie Mellon) — precedence networks with SS/FS lags, cash-flow financing, contract types; Halpin, D.W. & Senior, B.A., Construction Management (4th ed., Wiley) — CPM/LOB scheduling, formwork & equipment production, bonding and cash flow; Canadian Construction Documents Committee, CCDC 2 — Stipulated Price Contract (2020) — contract clauses, addenda, change orders, holdback; Canadian Foundation Engineering Manual (CFEM) & WorkSafeBC Occupational Health and Safety Regulation, Part 20 — excavation support and shoring.
Question text not reproduced: the examination questions are © Engineers and Geoscientists BC. Open the official past paper (linked at the top of this page) to read the question, then follow the worked solution below.
Given. A generic construction project's cumulative cost (or percent-complete) plotted against time follows a repeatable "S" shape, independent of project size.
Find. The shape of the curve and the physical reason for each of its three segments.
The curve is flat and slow at the start while mobilization, permits, submittals and early site/foundation work generate low weekly expenditure; it steepens through the middle of the project as multiple trades work concurrently at peak production; and it flattens again near completion as work narrows to finishing trades, punch-list items and demobilization. The same S-shape is why the project's financing need (Part b) also builds slowly, peaks mid-project, and tapers off.
Given. The project's cumulative cash-out (S-curve) and cumulative payment-received (a stepped curve, since progress payments are received periodically) were read from the source cash-flow diagram at each month-end.
| Month | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cash out (cum.) | 0 | 3 | 12 | 16 | 46 | 55 | 72 | 73 |
| Payment received (cum.) | 0 | 0 | 4 | 13 | 17 | 49 | 58 | 80 |
Find. The peak amount of cash the contractor must finance, and the total interest at 1.5 %/month.
Approach. Take the outstanding balance (cash out minus payment received) at each month-end; the peak financing need is the largest gap between the two curves (which occurs just before a payment step, not after); total interest is estimated as 1.5 % of the outstanding balance carried during each month, summed over the months a balance is owed.
| Quantity | Value |
|---|---|
| Peak outstanding balance (highest cash needed) | ≈ $38,000 (just before month 5) |
| Sum of month-end balances, months 1–6 | $63,000-months |
| Total interest at 1.5%/month | ≈ $945 |
Three measures to reduce interest charges. (1) Bill more frequently and front-load the schedule of values — monthly progress claims lag the actual cost curve; claiming bi-weekly, and loading early line items slightly (within what the consultant will certify), shrinks the financed gap. (2) Negotiate a shorter payment-certification cycle and reduced holdback release delay — every day shaved off the owner's pay-when-certified cycle is a day less interest on that draw. (3) Sequence procurement and subcontractor payment to match the S-curve — delaying large material buys until closer to installation, and paying subtrades on the same cycle the contractor is paid, avoids the contractor pre-financing cost the project has not yet earned billings for.