NivaarExam PrepOfficial exam papers ↗

24-Bld-A3 Construction Engineering · Undated paper

Question 2 of 7: S-Curve, Project Cash-Flow Financing and Interest

Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)

Notes on this paper

National Examinations — 07-Bld-A3, May 2019 — Construction Engineering. Closed book; candidates may use one of the two approved calculators (Casio or Sharp). The paper prints seven questions of equal value (20 marks each) and states that any five questions constitute a complete paper, only the first five appearing in the answer book being marked. Candidates are urged to record any interpretive assumptions with their answers. All seven questions are worked below, because the set is intended as a study resource rather than as a single exam sitting.

Reference texts: Hendrickson, C. & Au, T., Project Management for Construction (2nd ed., Carnegie Mellon) — precedence networks with SS/FS lags, cash-flow financing, contract types; Halpin, D.W. & Senior, B.A., Construction Management (4th ed., Wiley) — CPM/LOB scheduling, formwork & equipment production, bonding and cash flow; Canadian Construction Documents Committee, CCDC 2 — Stipulated Price Contract (2020) — contract clauses, addenda, change orders, holdback; Canadian Foundation Engineering Manual (CFEM) & WorkSafeBC Occupational Health and Safety Regulation, Part 20 — excavation support and shoring.

Question 2: S-Curve, Project Cash-Flow Financing and Interest (20 marks)

Question text not reproduced: the examination questions are © Engineers and Geoscientists BC. Open the official past paper (linked at the top of this page) to read the question, then follow the worked solution below.

(a) The typical S-curve

Given. A generic construction project's cumulative cost (or percent-complete) plotted against time follows a repeatable "S" shape, independent of project size.

Find. The shape of the curve and the physical reason for each of its three segments.

Cum. cost ($) Time slow start steep mid-phase flattens at closeout
Fig. Q2-1 — typical cumulative-cost S-curve.

The curve is flat and slow at the start while mobilization, permits, submittals and early site/foundation work generate low weekly expenditure; it steepens through the middle of the project as multiple trades work concurrently at peak production; and it flattens again near completion as work narrows to finishing trades, punch-list items and demobilization. The same S-shape is why the project's financing need (Part b) also builds slowly, peaks mid-project, and tapers off.

(b) Financing the cost–revenue gap

Given. The project's cumulative cash-out (S-curve) and cumulative payment-received (a stepped curve, since progress payments are received periodically) were read from the source cash-flow diagram at each month-end.

Month-end cumulative values read from the source diagram ($ thousands)
Month01234567
Cash out (cum.)03121646557273
Payment received (cum.)0041317495880
04080 ($k) 01234567 Month Cash out Payment received
Fig. Q2-2 — cumulative cash-out (S-curve, blue) and cumulative payment-received (step function, red). The vertical gap is the amount financed at any time; it is largest just before month 5, right before the big progress payment lands.

Find. The peak amount of cash the contractor must finance, and the total interest at 1.5 %/month.

Approach. Take the outstanding balance (cash out minus payment received) at each month-end; the peak financing need is the largest gap between the two curves (which occurs just before a payment step, not after); total interest is estimated as 1.5 % of the outstanding balance carried during each month, summed over the months a balance is owed.

  1. Month-end outstanding balance. $Balance(m) = CashOut(m) - PaymentReceived(m)$: month 1 → $3-0=3$; month 2 → $12-4=8$; month 3 → $16-13=3$; month 4 → $46-17=29$; month 5 → $55-49=6$; month 6 → $72-58=14$; month 7 → $73-80=-7$ (the project is now in surplus — the final payment overshoots the small remaining cost).
  2. Peak amount of cash needed. Because payments arrive as discrete steps while cost accrues continuously, the largest gap occurs an instant before each step, i.e. $CashOut(m) - PaymentReceived(m-1)$. Checking all seven months, the maximum is at month 5: $CashOut(5) - PaymentReceived(4) = 55 - 17 = 38$. $$\boxed{\text{Highest amount of cash needed} \approx \$38{,}000, \text{ occurring just before the month-5 progress payment}}$$
  3. Total interest at 1.5%/month. Charging 1.5 % on the balance carried during each month that a balance is owed (months 1–6; month 7 is already in surplus): $$\text{Interest} = 0.015\times(3+8+3+29+6+14) = 0.015\times 63 = 0.945\text{ (\$ thousand)}$$ $$\boxed{\text{Total interest} \approx \$945}$$
QuantityValue
Peak outstanding balance (highest cash needed)≈ $38,000 (just before month 5)
Sum of month-end balances, months 1–6$63,000-months
Total interest at 1.5%/month≈ $945

Three measures to reduce interest charges. (1) Bill more frequently and front-load the schedule of values — monthly progress claims lag the actual cost curve; claiming bi-weekly, and loading early line items slightly (within what the consultant will certify), shrinks the financed gap. (2) Negotiate a shorter payment-certification cycle and reduced holdback release delay — every day shaved off the owner's pay-when-certified cycle is a day less interest on that draw. (3) Sequence procurement and subcontractor payment to match the S-curve — delaying large material buys until closer to installation, and paying subtrades on the same cycle the contractor is paid, avoids the contractor pre-financing cost the project has not yet earned billings for.