NivaarExam PrepOfficial exam papers ↗

23-Chem-A3 Heat and Mass Transfer · December 2014

Question 3 of 7: Dissolution of a polymer film into a flowing solvent

Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)

Notes on this paper

National Exams — December 2014 — 04-Chem-A3 Mass Transfer Operations. Three-hour, open-book exam; any non-communicating calculator permitted. Format: seven questions in three parts — answer one of Q1–Q2 (Part A), one of Q3–Q4 (Part B) and two of Q5–Q7 (Part C); four questions of equal value constitute a complete paper. All seven are solved below for completeness. Every property datum (vapour pressures, diffusivities, Henry constants) is stated in the question, so each answer is self-contained.

Reference texts: Geankoplis, Transport Processes and Separation Process Principles (4th ed., Prentice Hall) — molecular diffusion, convective mass transfer and gas absorption; Welty, Wicks, Wilson & Rorrer, Fundamentals of Momentum, Heat and Mass Transfer (6th ed., Wiley) — boundary-layer mass transfer and diffusion with reaction; Incropera & DeWitt, Fundamentals of Heat and Mass Transfer (species diffusion, sphere in a stagnant medium); Treybal, Mass-Transfer Operations (3rd ed.) — packed-tower and wetted-wall design; supporting data from Perry's Chemical Engineers' Handbook (9th ed.).

Question 3: Dissolution of a polymer film into a flowing solvent (Part B — equal value)

Question text not reproduced: the examination questions are © Engineers and Geoscientists BC. Open the official past paper (linked at the top of this page) to read the question, then follow the worked solution below.

Given. Liquid MEK flows over a flat, soluble polymer strip; polymer (A) dissolves from the wall into the moving solvent (B). The concentration boundary layer grows along the plate, so this is a classic laminar flat-plate convective mass-transfer problem (all data in cgs).

QuantityValue
Diffusivity $D_{AB}$$3.0\times10^{-6}$ cm²/s
Kinematic viscosity $\nu_B$$6.0\times10^{-3}$ cm²/s
Surface solubility $c_{A,s}$0.04 g/cm³
Volumetric flow $Q$30 cm³/s
Channel width $w$ / depth $h$10 cm / 2.0 cm
Film length $L$20 cm

Find. (a) $Sc$ and $\overline{Sh}_L$; (b) the average dissolution flux $\overline{N_A}$ (g of polymer/cm²·s).

polymer film (0.2 mm), L = 20 cm, c_A,s = 0.04 g/cm³ MEK, v = 1.5 cm/s concentration boundary layer x = 0 x = L
Figure 3 — Laminar liquid MEK sweeps the dissolving polymer strip; the concentration boundary layer thickens with distance $x$. The bulk stays essentially polymer-free ($c_{A\infty}\approx0$), so the whole surface solubility drives the transfer.

Approach. Get the mean velocity from the channel cross-section, form $Re_L$ and $Sc$, apply the laminar flat-plate correlation $\overline{Sh}_L=0.664\,Re_L^{1/2}Sc^{1/3}$, then convert to a coefficient and multiply by the surface solubility.

  1. Schmidt number. $$Sc=\frac{\nu_B}{D_{AB}}=\frac{6.0\times10^{-3}}{3.0\times10^{-6}}=\boxed{2000}.$$ A large $Sc$ (thin concentration layer inside a thicker momentum layer) is typical of liquids.
  2. Mean solvent velocity. From the channel cross-section, $$v=\frac{Q}{w\,h}=\frac{30}{(10)(2.0)}=1.5\ \text{cm/s}.$$
  3. Plate Reynolds number. On the 20-cm film length, $$Re_L=\frac{vL}{\nu_B}=\frac{(1.5)(20)}{6.0\times10^{-3}}=5000\ (\ll 5\times10^5,\ \text{laminar}).$$
  4. Average Sherwood number. $$\overline{Sh}_L=0.664\,Re_L^{1/2}Sc^{1/3}=0.664\,(5000)^{1/2}(2000)^{1/3}=\boxed{592}.$$
  5. Average mass-transfer coefficient. $$\overline{k_c}=\frac{\overline{Sh}_L\,D_{AB}}{L}=\frac{(592)(3.0\times10^{-6})}{20}=8.87\times10^{-5}\ \text{cm/s}.$$
  6. Average dissolution flux. With $c_{A\infty}\approx0$, $$\overline{N_A}=\overline{k_c}\,(c_{A,s}-c_{A\infty})=(8.87\times10^{-5})(0.04)=\boxed{3.55\times10^{-6}\ \text{g/cm}^2\!\cdot\!\text{s}}.$$
QuantityResult
Schmidt number $Sc$2000
Reynolds number $Re_L$5000 (laminar)
Average Sherwood number $\overline{Sh}_L$592
Average coefficient $\overline{k_c}$$8.87\times10^{-5}$ cm/s
Average flux $\overline{N_A}$$3.55\times10^{-6}$ g/cm²·s
Check
The velocity comes from the full channel cross-section ($w\times h=10\times2.0$ cm), not the pan length; $Re_L=5000$ confirms laminar flow, validating the $0.664\,Re^{1/2}Sc^{1/3}$ correlation. The solid density $\rho_{A,\text{solid}}$ and solvent density $\rho_B$ are not needed for the flux — they would only enter a film-recession (thickness-vs-time) calculation, which the question does not ask.