23-Chem-B4 Biochemical Engineering · Undated paper
Question 2 of 5: First-Principles Derivation of the Michaelis–Menten Equation
Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)
Notes on this paper
National Exam 16-Chem-B4, Biochemical Engineering — May 2019 (the header on page 1 reads "16-Chem-B4/May 2019"). 3 hours, Closed-Book Exam (approved Casio or Sharp calculator
permitted). Per the exam notes, FIVE (5) questions constitute a complete paper and all five must be answered;
each question is of equal value (20 marks) and short-essay-format answers are marked for clarity and
organization.
Interpretation notes: Two points where the printed question itself needs an interpretation are flagged where they are used: the meaning of p in the Question 1 solubility equation, and the definition of the observable Thiele modulus in Question 3.
Question 2: First-Principles Derivation of the Michaelis–Menten Equation (20 marks)
Approach. Start from the elementary two-step enzyme mechanism, write a mass balance on total
enzyme, and close the system with the pseudo-steady-state approximation on the enzyme–substrate complex
(the Briggs–Haldane derivation).
Elementary mechanism. Free enzyme E binds substrate S reversibly to form the
enzyme–substrate complex ES, which breaks down irreversibly to release product P and regenerate free
enzyme:
$$E+S\ \underset{k_{-1}}{\overset{k_1}{\rightleftharpoons}}\ ES\ \xrightarrow{k_2}\ E+P$$
Rate of product formation. Product is generated only in the breakdown step, so the reaction
velocity is
$$v=\frac{d[P]}{dt}=k_2[ES]$$
— not yet useful, since [ES] is not directly measurable.
Total-enzyme mass balance. Enzyme is neither created nor destroyed; at every instant it is
either free or bound:
$$[E]_0=[E]+[ES]\quad\Rightarrow\quad[E]=[E]_0-[ES]$$
Pseudo-steady-state approximation on [ES]. Because $k_1,k_{-1},k_2\gg$ the rate at which
[S] itself changes, [ES] is formed and consumed at essentially equal rates after a brief initial transient:
$$\frac{d[ES]}{dt}=k_1[E][S]-k_{-1}[ES]-k_2[ES]\approx0$$
Substituting [E] from Step 3,
$$k_1\big([E]_0-[ES]\big)[S]=(k_{-1}+k_2)[ES]$$
Solve for [ES]. Expanding and collecting terms in [ES],
$$k_1[E]_0[S]=[ES]\Big(k_1[S]+k_{-1}+k_2\Big)\quad\Rightarrow\quad[ES]=\frac{[E]_0[S]}{[S]+\dfrac{k_{-1}+k_2}{k_1}}$$
Defining the Michaelis constant $K_m\equiv(k_{-1}+k_2)/k_1$ (a lumped ratio of rate constants, units of
concentration),
$$[ES]=\frac{[E]_0[S]}{K_m+[S]}$$
Substitute back into the rate expression. Defining the maximum velocity
$V_m\equiv k_2[E]_0$ (the rate at total saturation, $[S]\to\infty$, when essentially all enzyme is bound as ES),
$$\boxed{v=\frac{V_mS}{K_m+S}}$$
Quantity
Definition
Michaelis constant
Km = (k−1+k2)/k1
Maximum velocity
Vm = k2[E]0
Result
v = VmS/(Km+S)
Assumptions. (1) Only the elementary scheme $E+S\rightleftharpoons ES\to E+P$ operates —
no substrate/product inhibition complexes. (2) The product step is irreversible (valid for initial-rate
measurements, before product accumulates enough to drive a reverse reaction). (3) $[S]\gg[E]_0$, so the
substrate consumed in forming ES is a negligible fraction of total substrate, keeping [S] essentially constant
over the measurement window. (4) $d[ES]/dt\approx0$ (pseudo-steady state), valid once the sub-second
pre-steady-state transient has decayed. (5) The system is well mixed and isothermal, and each step follows
simple mass-action kinetics.