NivaarExam PrepOfficial exam papers ↗

23-Chem-B6 Petroleum Refining and Petrochemicals · December 2013

Question 4 of 6: Acid-Gas Removal, Isomerisation and Ethane Combustion

Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)

Notes on this paper

Paper format: Closed-book, 3 hours; six problems of equal value, of which five constitute a complete paper (the first four in the answer book are marked). Most parts call for concise essay answers; several require calculations with all steps shown.

Reference texts: Gary, Handwerk, Kaiser & Geddes, Petroleum Refining: Technology and Economics (5th ed., CRC Press) — refinery processes, product properties; Fahim, Al-Sahhaf & Elkilani, Fundamentals of Petroleum Refining (Elsevier) — hydrogen production, treating, cracking; Felder, Rousseau & Bullard, Elementary Principles of Chemical Processes (4th ed., Wiley) — material balances, recycle, combustion and gas-law calculations; supporting property data from Perry's Chemical Engineers' Handbook (9th ed.).

Question 4: Acid-Gas Removal, Isomerisation and Ethane Combustion (20 marks — equal value)

Question text not reproduced: the examination questions are © Engineers and Geoscientists BC. Open the official past paper (linked at the top of this page) to read the question, then follow the worked solution below.

(a) Three removal processes for each acid gas

Hydrogen sulphide (H₂S): (1) Amine absorption — chemical scrubbing with a regenerable alkanolamine (MEA, DEA, MDEA); H₂S reacts reversibly and is stripped in a regenerator, then routed to a Claus sulphur-recovery unit. (2) Caustic (alkaline) scrubbing — irreversible reaction with NaOH for smaller streams. (3) Solid-bed adsorption / scavenging — iron sponge (iron oxide) or zinc oxide beds, $ZnO + H_2S \rightarrow ZnS + H_2O$, giving very deep polishing.

Carbon dioxide (CO₂): (1) Amine absorption — the same regenerable alkanolamine circuit (MDEA is often selected for CO₂). (2) Physical-solvent absorption — Selexol or Rectisol (chilled methanol), which dissolve CO₂ physically and are favoured at high partial pressures. (3) Membrane separation — polymeric membranes that preferentially permeate CO₂; molecular-sieve adsorption is a further option for final drying/polishing.

(b) Importance of isomerisation

Isomerisation rearranges straight-chain (normal) paraffins into their branched isomers without changing molecular weight, e.g. $n\text{-}C_5/n\text{-}C_6 \rightarrow$ iso-pentane / iso-hexanes over a Pt / chlorided-alumina or zeolite catalyst at low temperature. Its importance is twofold: (i) it markedly raises the octane number of the light naphtha (branched paraffins knock far less than n-paraffins) without adding aromatics such as benzene, helping refiners meet clean-gasoline specifications; and (ii) it converts n-butane to isobutane, the essential feedstock for alkylation. It is a low-severity, high-value route to premium gasoline blendstock.

(c) Flue-gas composition from ethane combustion

Given. Feed gas (basis 100 mol): 80 mol ethane (C₂H₆) and 20 mol O₂, burned with 200% excess air. Of the ethane, 80% → CO₂, 10% → CO, 10% remains unburned.

QuantityValue
Ethane in feed80 mol
Oxygen in feed20 mol
Excess air200%
Ethane split80% CO₂ / 10% CO / 10% unburned

Find. The molar composition of the stack (flue) gas.

Approach. Establish the theoretical oxygen for complete combustion (crediting the O₂ already in the feed), size the air from the 200% excess, run the actual (partial) reactions to get products and oxygen consumed, then tally every stack component.

  1. Theoretical oxygen. Complete combustion is $C_2H_6+\tfrac{7}{2}O_2\rightarrow 2CO_2+3H_2O$, so burning all 80 mol ethane needs $80\times3.5=280$ mol O₂. The feed already supplies 20 mol O₂, so the air must furnish a net theoretical $$O_{2,\text{theo}}^{\text{air}} = 280-20 = 260\ \text{mol}.$$
  2. Air supplied at 200% excess. "200% excess" means the air O₂ is three times theoretical: $$O_{2,\text{air}} = 3\times260 = 780\ \text{mol},\qquad N_2 = 780\times\frac{79}{21} = 2934.3\ \text{mol}.$$
  3. Actual reactions. $64$ mol ethane (80%) burns to CO₂, $8$ mol (10%) to CO, $8$ mol (10%) is unburned: $$64\,C_2H_6 \rightarrow 128\,CO_2 + 192\,H_2O\ \ (\text{O}_2\ \text{used}=224),$$ $$8\,C_2H_6 \rightarrow 16\,CO + 24\,H_2O\ \ (\text{O}_2\ \text{used}=20).$$ Total O₂ consumed $=224+20=244$ mol.
  4. Oxygen leaving. Oxygen in $=$ air + feed $=780+20=800$ mol, so $$O_{2,\text{out}} = 800-244 = 556\ \text{mol}.$$
  5. Assemble the stack gas. Collecting all species (H₂O totals $192+24=216$ mol): $$CO_2=128,\ CO=16,\ H_2O=216,\ O_2=556,\ N_2=2934.3,\ C_2H_6=8,$$ $$n_{\text{total}} = \boxed{3858.3\ \text{mol}}.$$
  6. Mole percents. Divide each by the total: $$\boxed{CO_2\ 3.32\%,\ CO\ 0.41\%,\ H_2O\ 5.60\%,\ O_2\ 14.41\%,\ N_2\ 76.05\%,\ C_2H_6\ 0.21\%.}$$
Stack speciesMoles (per 100 mol feed)mol% (wet)
CO₂1283.32
CO160.41
H₂O2165.60
O₂55614.41
N₂2934.376.05
C₂H₆ (unburned)80.21
Total3858.3100.0
Check
Theoretical air is taken net of the 20 mol O₂ already in the fuel gas (the Felder convention), so the air supplies $3\times260=780$ mol O₂. If instead the excess is applied to the full 280 mol without crediting feed oxygen, the air O₂ becomes 840 mol and N₂ rises to 3160 mol, shifting the percentages by ~1 point. The convention used is stated with the answer, as the exam's "state your assumptions" instruction invites.