23-Chem-B6 Petroleum Refining and Petrochemicals · December 2013
Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)
Paper format: Closed-book, 3 hours; six problems of equal value, of which five constitute a complete paper (the first four in the answer book are marked). Most parts call for concise essay answers; several require calculations with all steps shown.
Reference texts: Gary, Handwerk, Kaiser & Geddes, Petroleum Refining: Technology and Economics (5th ed., CRC Press) — refinery processes, product properties; Fahim, Al-Sahhaf & Elkilani, Fundamentals of Petroleum Refining (Elsevier) — hydrogen production, treating, cracking; Felder, Rousseau & Bullard, Elementary Principles of Chemical Processes (4th ed., Wiley) — material balances, recycle, combustion and gas-law calculations; supporting property data from Perry's Chemical Engineers' Handbook (9th ed.).
Question text not reproduced: the examination questions are © Engineers and Geoscientists BC. Open the official past paper (linked at the top of this page) to read the question, then follow the worked solution below.
The pour point of a crude oil (or fuel) is the lowest temperature at which the oil will still flow, or "pour," under the conditions of a standard test. Just below the pour point the paraffin waxes crystallise into a network that gels the oil so that it no longer flows. It is an important cold-handling property governing pipelining, pumping and storage of waxy crudes in cold climates.
Thermal cracking proceeds by a free-radical chain mechanism with three types of step. Initiation is homolytic scission of a C–C bond to form two radicals; for but-1-ene the weakest bond is the allylic $CH_3\!-\!CH_2$ bond (the C–C bond $\beta$ to the double bond), whose scission gives a methyl and a resonance-stabilised allyl radical: $CH_3CH_2CH{=}CH_2 \rightarrow CH_3\!\cdot + \cdot CH_2CH{=}CH_2$. Propagation combines hydrogen abstraction, radical addition and $\beta$-scission (cleavage of the bond $\beta$ to the radical centre, releasing an olefin and a new radical). A methyl radical abstracts an allylic H to give methane and a methylallyl radical, $CH_3\!\cdot + C_4H_8 \rightarrow CH_4 + CH_3\dot{C}HCH{=}CH_2$, which loses an H atom by $\beta$-scission to form 1,3-butadiene, $C_4H_6 + H\!\cdot$. The H atom adds to the terminal carbon of another butene to give the 2-butyl radical, $CH_3CH_2\dot{C}HCH_3$, whose $\beta$-scission yields propylene and a methyl radical, $C_3H_6 + CH_3\!\cdot$ (a 1-butyl radical would instead split into ethylene and an ethyl radical, $C_2H_4 + C_2H_5\!\cdot$). The chain therefore cracks butene to lighter olefins (ethylene, propylene) and methane. Overall this also dehydrogenates part of the butene (net: butene → 1,3-butadiene $C_4H_6 + H_2$) and, at high severity, polymerisation/condensation of unsaturated fragments toward heavy tar and coke. Termination is radical recombination, e.g. $2\,CH_3\!\cdot \rightarrow C_2H_6$. The net effect is conversion of the feed into lighter olefins and paraffins plus a heavier residue.
Liquid-phase thermal cracking (visbreaking, delayed coking, older thermal cracking) operates typically at about 450–540 °C (roughly 850–1000 °F) and pressures from a few bar up to ~20–70 bar. High-severity gas-phase steam cracking to produce olefins runs hotter and leaner, about 750–900 °C at near-atmospheric to a few bar with steam dilution. In short, temperatures rise and pressures fall as the target shifts from residue upgrading toward light-olefin production.
Given. Feed $F=5000$ kg at 5% ethanol / 95% water; distillate $D=\tfrac{1}{5}F$ at 75% ethanol / 25% water; the balance leaves as bottoms $W$.
| Stream | Rate | Ethanol |
|---|---|---|
| Feed F | 5000 kg | 5% → 250 kg |
| Distillate D | F/5 = 1000 kg | 75% (stated) |
| Bottoms W | F − D | by difference |
Find. The ethanol (alcohol) leaving in the bottoms.
Approach. Use an overall mass balance for the bottoms rate and an ethanol component balance for the alcohol split; the alcohol lost in the bottoms is simply the ethanol in the feed minus the ethanol in the distillate.
| Quantity | Result |
|---|---|
| Bottoms rate W | 4000 kg |
| Ethanol in feed | 250 kg |
| Alcohol lost in bottoms | $m_{E,W}=250-0.75D$ (see note — figure data inconsistent) |