$L_1U_1$ (left rafter). Joint $L_1$ vertical: the rafter rises 3 in 5, so $R_{L_1}+\tfrac35 F_{L_1U_1}=0\Rightarrow F_{L_1U_1}=-\tfrac53(27)=\boxed{45\text{ kN C}}$.
$U_1L_3$ (diagonal). A section through $U_1U_2,\,U_1L_3,\,L_2L_3$ and vertical equilibrium of the left part gives $F_{U_1L_3}=\boxed{9\text{ kN T}}$.
$L_3L_4$ (bottom chord). Moments about $U_2(8,5)$ of the left part: $F_{L_3L_4}=\boxed{60\text{ kN T}}$.
Member
Force
$L_1U_1$
45 kN C
$U_1L_3$
9 kN T
$L_3L_4$
60 kN T
4(b) — king-post-style truss
Given. $L_1(0),L_2(4),L_3(12),L_4(16)$; $M_1(4,3),M_2(8,3),M_3(12,3)$; apex $U_1(8,6)$; pin $L_1$, roller $L_4$; $36$ kN ↓ at $U_1$ and at $M_3$.
Determinacy check. With the members shown (no chord between the apex and $M_2$) the truss has $m=13,\ j=8,\ r=3$, so $m+r-2j=0$ — determinate. The rank test confirms that adding a $U_1M_2$ vertical would make it 1° indeterminate, so that line is read as the load arrow, not a member.
In both trusses the reactions are equal (27 and 45 kN) because the two 36 kN panel loads share the same resultant position; only the internal load paths differ. Choosing a section that cuts the required bar plus two others lets each listed force be found from a single equilibrium equation, which is faster and less error-prone than marching joint-by-joint across the whole truss.