16-Civ-A1 Elementary Structural Analysis · December 2015
Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)
Reference texts: R.C. Hibbeler, Structural Analysis (10th ed., Pearson) — determinacy, method of joints/sections, virtual-work deflections, moment distribution / slope–deflection, influence lines; A. Kassimali, Structural Analysis (6th ed., Cengage) — internal hinges, compound (Gerber) beams and three-hinged frames. Sign convention: sagging bending moment positive, upward reactions positive, member tension positive (T) / compression negative (C).
The paper requires Q1–Q4 in full plus two of Q5/Q6/Q7/Q8. For completeness all eight questions are worked here.
Question text not reproduced: the examination questions are © Engineers and Geoscientists BC. Open the official past paper (linked at the top of this page) to read the question, then follow the worked solution below.
Given.
| Left column $L_1(0,0),L_2(0,3),L_3(0,6)$; right column $R_1(8,0),R_2(8,3),R_3(8,6)$; mid $M_1(4,3),M_2(4,6)$ | Pins at $L_1,R_1$; $80$ kN → at $R_2$; $EA=9.45\times10^{4}$ kN |
Find. Horizontal deflection at $L_3$.
Approach. Virtual work: $\delta_{L_3}=\displaystyle\sum \frac{N\,n\,L}{EA}$, where $N$ are the real bar forces (80 kN system) and $n$ those from a unit horizontal load at $L_3$.
| Quantity | Value |
|---|---|
| $\sum NnL$ | 312.5 kN²·m |
| Horizontal deflection at $L_3$ | 3.31 mm (in the direction of the 80 kN load) |
The striking feature of this result is that a single diagonal governs the whole deflection: the 80 kN load and the virtual unit load only share a common force in bar $M_1R_1$, so every other member drops out of the summation. This is a good reminder that virtual work rewards a smart choice of the virtual system — here, a unit load applied exactly where (and in the direction) the deflection is wanted.