16-Civ-A4 Geotechnical Materials and Analysis · Undated paper
Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)
National Examinations — May 2019 | 16-Civ-A4 Geotechnical Materials and Analysis | 3 hours, open book | 100 marks | Answer ALL questions (Q1–Q6).
Reference texts: Das & Sobhan, Principles of Geotechnical Engineering, 9th ed. (Cengage); Craig, Craig's Soil Mechanics, 8th ed.; Holtz, Kovacs & Sheahan, An Introduction to Geotechnical Engineering, 2nd ed. Canadian practice frame (CFEM 4th ed., EGBC).
Question text not reproduced: the examination questions are © Engineers and Geoscientists BC. Open the official past paper (linked at the top of this page) to read the question, then follow the worked solution below.
The ten items and their correct choices:
Answers with reasons.
1 → (A) 2×10−6 m. The clay fraction is defined (Unified / CFEM) as particles finer than 0.002 mm = 2 µm = 2×10−6 m; the coarser sizes listed are silt.
2 → (B) Plastic limit. For most fine soils the standard-Proctor optimum water content plots close to the plastic limit, where the soil is workable but not yet a paste.
3 → (B) Permeability. Compaction expels air and reduces the void ratio, so hydraulic conductivity drops (often by orders of magnitude); strength and bearing capacity increase.
4 → (A) Falling-head test. Fine-grained, low-permeability soils pass too little flow to time accurately in a constant-head cell; the falling-head permeameter measures the small discharge through the drop of a standpipe. (The piezometer is a field device, not a lab permeability test.)
5 → (C) Expulsion of water from the voids. Saturated-clay settlement is consolidation: the excess pore pressure dissipates and pore water is squeezed out over time. Grains and water are treated as incompressible.
6 → (A) True. Overconsolidated clay, like dense sand, dilates on shearing and shows a distinct peak followed by strain-softening toward a critical state.
7 → (B) False. A CU test with pore-pressure measurement gives both the total-stress parameters (from the total-stress circles) and the effective-stress parameters (using the measured u). The word “only” makes the statement false.
8 → (A) and (C) are INCORRECT. (A) is wrong: overconsolidated clay develops an apparent effective cohesion $c' > 0$; it is the normally consolidated clay whose envelope passes through the origin ($c' \approx 0$). (C) is wrong: an undrained test is a constant-volume test — no drainage, hence no volume reduction. Statements (B) (dilatant clays generate negative pore pressure) and (D) (CD parameters govern long-term, fully-drained stability) are correct.
9 → (B) is NOT an assumption (and (C) is a boundary condition, not a theory assumption). Terzaghi's theory assumes the coefficient of volume change $m_v$ and permeability $k$ remain constant over the small stress increment (so that $c_v$ is constant); (B) states the opposite. Whether the layer drains from one or both faces is a boundary condition the theory accommodates, not a founding assumption — so (C) also does not belong. Items (A), (D), (E) are genuine assumptions.
10 → (A) CD triaxial. The CD test is drained; both the vane-shear and the unconfined-compression tests on saturated clay are performed rapidly with no drainage (undrained). The CD test is therefore the odd one out.