NivaarExam PrepOfficial exam papers ↗

16-Civ-A4 Geotechnical Materials and Analysis · Undated paper

Question 6 of 6: Consolidated-Undrained Triaxial Series

Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)

Notes on this paper

National Examinations — May 2019  |  16-Civ-A4 Geotechnical Materials and Analysis  |  3 hours, open book  |  100 marks  |  Answer ALL questions (Q1–Q6).

Reference texts: Das & Sobhan, Principles of Geotechnical Engineering, 9th ed. (Cengage); Craig, Craig's Soil Mechanics, 8th ed.; Holtz, Kovacs & Sheahan, An Introduction to Geotechnical Engineering, 2nd ed. Canadian practice frame (CFEM 4th ed., EGBC).

Source-quality note. Flow-net field counts carry the usual ±½-field hand-sketch tolerance (Exam Note 3).

Question 6: Consolidated-Undrained Triaxial Series (30 marks)

Question text not reproduced: the examination questions are © Engineers and Geoscientists BC. Open the official past paper (linked at the top of this page) to read the question, then follow the worked solution below.

Given. Table 1 — CU triaxial at failure (pore pressure measured; $u_0=0$ after consolidation):

Given data — CU triaxial series (Table 1)
Specimen$\sigma_3$ (kPa)$(\sigma_1-\sigma_3)_f$ (kPa)$u_f$ (kPa)
A15010382
B300202169

Find. (i) $c',\phi'$; (ii) $c_{cu},\phi_{cu}$; (iii) $(\sigma_1-\sigma_3)_f$ at $\sigma_3'=250$ kPa; (iv) the consolidation state.

080160240320400020406080100120140effective K_f (α'=23.7°)total K_f (α=13.9°)A'B'ABp or p' = (σ₁+σ₃)/2 (kPa)q = (σ₁-σ₃)/2 (kPa)
Modified (stress-path) diagram: total-stress points A, B and effective-stress points A′, B′ plotted as $p=(\sigma_1+\sigma_3)/2$ vs $q=(\sigma_1-\sigma_3)/2$. The effective $K_f$ line passes essentially through the origin.

Approach. Reduce each test to a stress point $(p,q)$; fit the modified ($K_f$) line for both total and effective stresses; convert its slope and intercept to Mohr–Coulomb $c,\phi$; then use Skempton's $A_f$ to predict the deviator stress at a new consolidation stress and to classify the clay.

  1. Stress points. With $q=(\sigma_1-\sigma_3)/2$ (unchanged by $u$) and $p'=p-u$:
    $\sigma_1$$q$$p=\frac{\sigma_1+\sigma_3}{2}$$p'=p-u$$A_f=\frac{u_f}{(\sigma_1-\sigma_3)_f}$
    A25351.5201.5119.50.80
    B502101.0401.0232.00.84
  2. (i) Effective parameters — modified envelope through A′, B′. The $K_f'$ line $q=a'+p'\tan\alpha'$ has $$\tan\alpha'=\frac{q_B-q_A}{p_B'-p_A'}=\frac{101.0-51.5}{232.0-119.5}=0.440,\qquad a'\approx0.$$ Converting to Mohr–Coulomb ($\sin\phi'=\tan\alpha'$, $c'=a'/\cos\phi'$): $$\phi'=\sin^{-1}(0.440)=\boxed{26.1^\circ},\qquad c'\approx\boxed{0}.$$
  3. (ii) Total parameters — analytical fit through A, B. The total-stress $K_f$ line has $$\tan\alpha=\frac{q_B-q_A}{p_B-p_A}=\frac{101.0-51.5}{401.0-201.5}=0.248,\qquad a\approx1.5\ \text{kPa}.$$ Hence $$\phi_{cu}=\sin^{-1}(0.248)=\boxed{14.4^\circ},\qquad c_{cu}=\frac{a}{\cos\phi_{cu}}\approx\boxed{1.6\ \text{kPa}\ (\approx0)}.$$
  4. (iii) Deviator stress at $\sigma_3'=250$ kPa. The soil is saturated ($B=1$) and its effective envelope is unique ($c'=0$), so with $N=\tan^2(45^\circ+\phi'/2)$ and $A_f\approx0.82$ (average; consistent with Figure 3 at OCR = 1), a constant-cell undrained shear from $\sigma_{3c}'=250$ kPa gives $$N=\tan^2\!\Big(45^\circ+\tfrac{26.1^\circ}{2}\Big)=2.57,$$ $$(\sigma_1-\sigma_3)_f=\frac{\sigma_{3c}'\,(N-1)}{(1-A_f)+N A_f}=\frac{250(2.57-1)}{(1-0.82)+2.57(0.82)}=\boxed{\approx 172\ \text{kPa}.}$$ A linear interpolation of the measured deviators against the consolidation stress (A: 150→103, B: 300→202) gives 169 kPa — the same answer, confirming the estimate.
  5. (iv) Consolidation state. Three independent indicators all point to normally consolidated: the effective envelope passes through the origin ($c'\approx0$); the pore-pressure parameter $A_f\approx0.82$ is high and positive (0.5–1.0 range — the soil is contractive, generating positive excess pressure on shearing); and Figure 3 maps $A_f\approx0.8$ to an overconsolidation ratio of about 1. An overconsolidated clay would instead show $c'>0$ and a low or negative $A_f$.
Q6 — results
PartResult
(i) Effective parameters$c'\approx0$, $\phi'\approx26.1^\circ$
(ii) Total parameters$c_{cu}\approx0$, $\phi_{cu}\approx14.4^\circ$
(iii) $(\sigma_1-\sigma_3)_f$ at $\sigma_3'=250$ kPa≈ 172 kPa
(iv) Statenormally consolidated ($c'\approx0$, $A_f\approx0.82$)
Back to the paper →