Question 1 of 7: Welded Plate Girder by the Non-Stiffened-Web Approach
Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)
Notes on this paper
Paper format. 16-Civ-B2 Advanced Structural Design, May 2018 — a three-hour examination. The cover page allows design handbooks and textbooks but no notes, states that any five questions constitute a complete paper, that all seven questions carry equal value, and that all loads shown on the figures are unfactored. The mark split printed on page 1 is Q1 (12+6+2), Q2 (12+8), Q3 (12+4+4), Q4 (14+6), Q5 (10+5+5), Q6 (10+4+6) and Q7 (12+8). All seven questions are worked below, because the set is a study resource rather than an answer book.
Design data (page 1, reproduced verbatim). These values are used throughout and are not repeated in every question.
Design data supplied with the paper
Material
Property
Value
Concrete
Cylinder strength $f'_{c}$
30 MPa
Structural steel
$F_{y}$
350 MPa
Reinforcing steel
$f_{y}$
400 MPa
Prestressed concrete
$f_{ci}$ at transfer
35 MPa
$f'_{c}$
50 MPa
Modular ratio $n$
6
$f_{ult}$
1750 MPa
$f_{y}$ (strand)
1450 MPa
$f_{initial}$
1200 MPa
Loss of prestress
240 MPa
Reference texts. The answers are written to the Canadian limit-states codes that Engineers Canada lists for this examination:
CSA S16:19, Design of Steel Structures (with the CISC Handbook of Steel Construction, 11th ed.).
CSA A23.3:19, Design of Concrete Structures (with the Cement Association of Canada Concrete Design Handbook, 4th ed.).
National Building Code of Canada 2020, Part 4, for load combinations.
CSA S6:19, Canadian Highway Bridge Design Code, for the bridge floor of Question 4.
Kulak and Grondin, Limit States Design in Structural Steel, 9th ed.; MacGregor and Bartlett, Reinforced Concrete: Mechanics and Design (Canadian edition); Collins and Mitchell, Prestressed Concrete Structures.
Check — load factors. Page 1 says only that the loads shown are unfactored; it gives no dead-to-live split. Every question below therefore applies a single $\alpha = 1.5$ to the loads printed on the figures (the NBCC live-load factor, which is the conservative reading of an unidentified load) and $\alpha_{D} = 1.25$ to any self weight the solution itself introduces. Mechanisms, section classifications and all interaction equations are independent of that choice; only the magnitudes move with it. State this assumption on the answer paper, as the cover page invites.
Question 1: Welded Plate Girder by the Non-Stiffened-Web Approach (12 + 6 + 2 marks)
Given. A prismatic welded girder continuous over four supports at 6 m centres — A pinned, B, C and D on rollers — carrying five unfactored 500 kN point loads. Reading the dimension string in Figure 1 from A, the loads stand at 3 m, 8 m, 10 m, 14 m and 16 m, that is at mid-span of A–B and at the third points of B–C and C–D. The steel is $F_{y} = 350$ MPa and the web is to carry its shear without intermediate transverse stiffeners.
Geometry and loading taken from Figure 1
Quantity
Value
Spans A–B, B–C, C–D
6.0 m each, 18.0 m overall
Point loads (unfactored)
5 × 500 kN
Load positions from A
3, 8, 10, 14, 16 m
Supports
A pinned; B, C, D rollers
Steel
$F_{y} = 350$ MPa, $E = 200\,000$ MPa
Lateral bracing
at every support and load point
Find. One welded cross-section — web plate plus two flange plates — that satisfies CSA S16 for factored moment, for factored shear with no intermediate stiffeners, and for their interaction at the section where both are large.
Figure 1: three-span continuous girder, five 500 kN service point loads.
Approach. Factor the loads, solve the two-degree indeterminate beam elastically for the moment and shear envelopes, then size the web first from the unstiffened shear rules of Clause 13.4.1.1 (because shear, not moment, is what the non-stiffened approach penalises), size the flanges from the elastic section modulus, and close with the Clause 14.6 moment-shear interaction at the interior support.
Factor the loads and allow for self weight. With the single live-load factor adopted above, $$P_{f} = 1.5 \times 500 = 750\ \text{kN}$$ The trial section reached in Steps 3 and 4 has an area of $19\,260\ \text{mm}^{2}$, so its self weight is $w = 19\,260 \times 10^{-6} \times 77 = 1.48\ \text{kN/m}$ and $w_{f} = 1.25 \times 1.48 = 1.85\ \text{kN/m}$. Self weight is barely one per cent of the applied load here, but it is carried through so that the numbers quoted below reproduce exactly.
Elastic analysis of the continuous beam. Four vertical reactions and two equations of equilibrium make the girder twice indeterminate; a stiffness solution (equivalently, two applications of the three-moment equation) gives the reactions $$R_{A}=237.8,\quad R_{B}=1206.0,\quad R_{C}=1799.7,\quad R_{D}=539.9\ \text{kN}$$ which sum to $3783.4$ kN, exactly the five factored loads plus $1.85 \times 18$ kN of self weight. The moment envelope follows.
Factored moments and shears (sagging positive)
Section
$M_{f}$ (kN·m)
$V_{f}$ (kN)
A ($x = 0$)
0
237.8
Load point, $x = 3$ m
+705.0
232.2 / −517.8
Support B, $x = 6$ m
−856.7
−523.3 / +682.7
Load point, $x = 8$ m
+504.9
678.9 / −71.1
Load point, $x = 10$ m
+359.1
−74.8 / −824.8
Support C, $x = 12$ m
−1294.2
−828.5 / +971.3
Load point, $x = 14$ m
+644.6
967.5 / +217.5
Load point, $x = 16$ m
+1076.0
213.8 / −536.2
D ($x = 18$ m)
0
−539.9
Factored bending-moment diagram for the girder of Figure 1 (1.5 x 500 kN plus 1.25 x self weight).
Both extremes fall at the same cross-section. The girder must be designed for $M_{f} = 1294$ kN·m and $V_{f} = 971$ kN acting together just to the right of support C, which is precisely why the paper asks for the interaction as well.
Size the web from the unstiffened-girder rules. Clause 14.3.1 caps the slenderness of a girder web carrying no intermediate stiffeners at $$\frac{h}{w} \le \frac{83\,000}{F_{y}} = \frac{83\,000}{350} = 237$$ and Clause 13.4.1.1 must then be evaluated with the shear-buckling coefficient for an infinitely long panel, $k_{v} = 5.34$. Because $\sqrt{k_{v}/F_{y}} = 0.1235$, the transition slendernesses are $439\sqrt{k_{v}/F_{y}} = 54.2$, $502\sqrt{k_{v}/F_{y}} = 62.0$ and $621\sqrt{k_{v}/F_{y}} = 76.7$. Trying a web plate of $900 \times 11$ mm gives $h/w = 81.8$, above the last of these, so the elastic buckling branch governs: $$F_{s} = F_{cre} = \frac{180\,000\,k_{v}}{(h/w)^{2}} = \frac{180\,000 \times 5.34}{81.8^{2}} = 143.6\ \text{MPa}$$ $$V_{r} = \phi A_{w} F_{s} = 0.90 \times (900 \times 11) \times 143.6 = \boxed{1279\ \text{kN}} \ge V_{f} = 971\ \text{kN}$$ The utilisation is $971/1279 = 0.76$. Note how expensive the ban on stiffeners is: the same web with a stiffener panel ratio $a/h = 1$ would develop $F_{s}$ near $0.66F_{y} = 231$ MPa, over 60 per cent more.
Size the flanges from the elastic section modulus. Try flange plates of $260 \times 18$ mm, giving an overall depth $d = 900 + 2(18) = 936$ mm. Working from the plate geometry, $$\begin{gathered}I_{x} = \frac{w h^{3}}{12} + 2 b t \left(\frac{d-t}{2}\right)^{2} = 2.641 \times 10^{9}\ \text{mm}^{4}, \\ S_{x} = \frac{2 I_{x}}{d} = 5.642 \times 10^{6}\ \text{mm}^{3}\end{gathered}$$ The flange slenderness is $b/2t = 260/36 = 7.22$, inside the Class 1 limit $145/\sqrt{F_{y}} = 7.75$, so the compression flange cannot buckle locally before the extreme fibre yields.
Check whether the slender web reduces the moment resistance. Clause 14.3.4 applies a reduction only when $$\frac{h}{w} \gt \frac{1900}{\sqrt{M_{f}/(\phi S_{x})}} = \frac{1900}{\sqrt{1294.2 \times 10^{6}/(0.90 \times 5.642 \times 10^{6})}} = \frac{1900}{\sqrt{254.9}} = 119.0$$ The web at $h/w = 81.8$ is well inside that limit, so no reduction is required and $$M_{r} = \phi S_{x} F_{y} = 0.90 \times 5.642 \times 10^{6} \times 350 = \boxed{1777\ \text{kN}\cdot\text{m}} \ge M_{f} = 1294\ \text{kN}\cdot\text{m}$$ a utilisation of 0.73.
Confirm that lateral-torsional buckling does not govern. The longest unbraced segment is the 3 m between A and its load point. With $I_{y} = 52.8 \times 10^{6}\ \text{mm}^{4}$, $J = 1.31 \times 10^{6}\ \text{mm}^{4}$ and $C_{w} = 1.11 \times 10^{13}\ \text{mm}^{6}$, Clause 13.6 gives $M_{u} = 5435$ kN·m even with $\omega_{2} = 1.0$. That is more than three times $0.67 M_{y}$, so the inelastic branch returns the full $\phi S_{x} F_{y}$ and Step 5 stands unaltered.
Moment-shear interaction at support C. Clause 14.6 combines the two actions on a girder web through $$0.727\,\frac{M_{f}}{M_{r}} + 0.455\,\frac{V_{f}}{V_{r}} \le 1.0$$ Substituting the two ratios just obtained, $$0.727(0.728) + 0.455(0.759) = 0.529 + 0.345 = \boxed{0.875} \le 1.0$$ The section is satisfactory. Strictly, the clause is triggered only when $M_{f}/M_{r} \gt 0.75$ and $V_{f}/V_{r} \gt 0.60$; here the moment ratio is 0.728, marginally below the trigger, so the check is a formality — but it is worth writing out, because the 2 marks the paper assigns to it are awarded for knowing that the interaction exists and where it bites.
Bearing stiffeners under the 500 kN loads and over the reactions are outside the question, which instructs the candidate to assume adequate load-base plates; in a real design they would be sized to Clause 14.4.2 and they do not affect the cross-section chosen here.
Welded plate-girder cross-section chosen for the non-stiffened-web approach.
Question 1 — final results
Quantity
Value
Factored design actions
$M_{f} = 1294$ kN·m, $V_{f} = 971$ kN, both just right of support C