16-Civ-B7 Transportation Planning and Engineering · December 2014
Question 6 of 7: Circular curve stationing and deflection-angle layout
Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)
Notes on this paper
Paper format. National Examinations, December 2014
— 98-Civ-B7 Highway Engineering. Three-hour, OPEN BOOK paper;
any non-communicating calculator permitted. Seven questions of equal value; a total of five
solutions constitutes a complete paper, and only the first five in the answer book are marked.
The grading scheme printed on page 1 splits the marks as Q1 (15+5), Q2 (12+8), Q3 (20),
Q4 (10+10), Q5 (10+10), Q6 (6+14), Q7 (5+15). Note 1 invites the candidate to state any
assumption made about an ambiguous question; Note 2 permits any required datum that is not
given to be assumed. All seven questions are solved here, because the set is
a study resource rather than a timed attempt.
Reference texts.
N. J. Garber and L. A. Hoel, Traffic and Highway Engineering, 5th ed. —
earthwork, geometric design and pavement design chapters.
AASHTO, Guide for Design of Pavement Structures (1993) — Part II, flexible
and rigid pavement design; the design equations behind the Alberta chart supplied with Q3.
Asphalt Institute, Asphalt Mix Design Methods, MS-2, 7th ed. — Marshall
procedure, mix criteria and HMA volumetrics.
M. S. Mamlouk and J. P. Zaniewski, Materials for Civil and Construction Engineers,
4th ed. — aggregates, asphalt binders and asphalt mixtures.
Alberta Transportation and Utilities, Pavement Design Manual — the
DARWin 3.0 structural-number design charts, one of which is reproduced on page 3 of this paper.
Transportation Association of Canada, Geometric Design Guide for Canadian Roads
— Canadian practice for horizontal alignment and curve layout.
CSA A23.1, Concrete Materials and Methods of Concrete Construction —
Canadian requirements for jointing, curing and concrete pavement construction.
Check — source check. The only defects on page 5 (Questions 6 and 7) are two typographical errors in
the printed paper itself (“horizintal” for horizontal and “Detrmine” for
determine). No question data is in doubt. Where the paper omits a datum the assumption made is
stated in a callout beside the calculation, as Note 2 of the paper permits.
Given. A simple circular curve with the point of intersection of the tangents
at station 12+78.230, a radius of 500 m and a central (deflection) angle of 86 degrees 28
minutes. Stationing is metric, so a full station is 100 m and the station 12+78.230 denotes a
chainage of 1278.230 m. The paper prints “horizintal” and “Detrmine”;
these are typographical errors in the original and are reproduced above as printed.
Find. (a) The chainage of the point of curvature and the point of tangency;
(b) the deflection angle from the back tangent at the PC to every full station on the curve, in
the form a survey party would set out with a total station or theodolite.
Figure 6.1 — Layout geometry of
the curve. The tangent distance T is measured back from the PI to the PC and forward from the PI
to the PT; the curve length L is measured along the arc. The deflection angle to any point is
half the central angle subtended by the arc from the PC to that point.
Approach. Convert the central angle to decimal degrees, compute the tangent
distance and arc length from the standard circular-curve relations, subtract and add them to the
PI chainage to place the PC and PT, then compute the deflection angle to each full station as
half the central angle subtended by the arc from the PC.
Part (a) — convert the central angle. Working in decimal degrees
throughout avoids sexagesimal arithmetic errors:
$$\Delta = 86^{\circ}28' = 86 + \frac{28}{60} = 86.466667^{\circ}
= 1.509128\ \text{rad}$$
Compute the tangent distance. The tangent distance is the distance from the
PI back to the PC, and forward from the PI to the PT, along the respective tangents:
$$T = R\tan\frac{\Delta}{2} = 500\tan(43.233333^{\circ}) = 500(0.940158)
= \boxed{470.079\ \text{m}}$$
Compute the length of curve. The curve length is the arc, not the chord:
$$L = R\,\Delta_{\text{rad}} = 500 \times 1.509128 = \boxed{754.564\ \text{m}}$$
For completeness the long chord is $LC = 2R\sin(\Delta/2) = 684.971$ m, the external distance is
$E = R[\sec(\Delta/2)-1] = 186.276$ m and the middle ordinate is
$M = R[1-\cos(\Delta/2)] = 135.715$ m.
Place the PC. The PC lies one tangent distance back along the back tangent
from the PI, so its chainage is the PI chainage less T:
$$\text{PC} = 1278.230 - 470.079 = 808.151\ \text{m}
\Rightarrow \boxed{\text{PC} = 8+08.151}$$
Place the PT. The PT must be found by adding the arc length to the
PC chainage, never by adding a second tangent distance to the PI chainage, because chainage runs
along the curve once the curve begins:
$$\text{PT} = 808.151 + 754.564 = 1562.715\ \text{m}
\Rightarrow \boxed{\text{PT} = 15+62.715}$$
Adding $T$ to the PI chainage instead would give 1748.309 m, which is 185.594 m too far; that
difference, $2T - L$, is the tangent-versus-arc discrepancy and is the classic error in this
calculation.
Part (b) — establish the deflection-angle relation. By the
inscribed-angle theorem, the angle between the back tangent at the PC and the chord to any point
P on the curve is half the central angle subtended by the arc from the PC to P. Writing
$\ell$ for that arc length,
$$\delta = \frac{1}{2}\cdot\frac{\ell}{R}\ \text{radians}
= \frac{90\,\ell}{\pi R}\ \text{degrees}$$
For $R = 500$ m this gives a convenient working rate of
$0.0572958^{\circ}$ per metre of arc, or $5^{\circ}43'46''$ per 100 m station.
Tabulate the deflection angles at the full stations. The full stations
lying on the curve are 9+00 through 15+00. For each, the arc from the PC is
$\ell = \text{station} - 808.151$, and $\delta$ follows from Step 6. The results are set out in
the table below. The instrument is set over the PC and oriented on the PI along the back tangent;
each deflection is then turned from that reference and the chord distance taped or measured to fix
the point.
Apply the closing check. The total deflection from the PC to the PT must
equal exactly half the central angle:
$$\delta_{\text{PT}} = \frac{90 \times 754.564}{\pi \times 500} = 43.23333^{\circ}
= 43^{\circ}14'00'' = \frac{\Delta}{2}\quad\checkmark$$
This is the standard field check and it closes exactly, confirming the stationing in part (a) and
every deflection in part (b).
Station
Arc from PC, m
Deflection angle, decimal degrees
Deflection angle, deg-min-sec
Chord from PC, m
PC 8+08.151
0.000
0.00000
0° 00′ 00″
0.000
9+00
91.849
5.26256
5° 15′ 45″
91.720
10+00
191.849
10.99214
10° 59′ 32″
190.674
11+00
291.849
16.72171
16° 43′ 18″
287.723
12+00
391.849
22.45129
22° 27′ 05″
381.898
13+00
491.849
28.18087
28° 10′ 51″
472.256
14+00
591.849
33.91045
33° 54′ 38″
557.896
15+00
691.849
39.64003
39° 38′ 24″
637.962
PT 15+62.715
754.564
43.23333
43° 14′ 00″
684.971
Check — field practice. The chord column is given
because deflection angles alone do not fix a point: the chord from the PC,
$C = 2R\sin\delta$, must be measured with it. Note also that the first and last sub-chords are
not 100 m — 91.849 m from the PC to 9+00 and 62.715 m from 15+00 to the PT — which
is normal, since the PC almost never falls on a full station. If the party prefers to occupy each
station in turn rather than remain at the PC, the incremental deflection between consecutive full
stations is a constant $5^{\circ}43'46''$, and the total-deflection column above is simply its
running sum offset by the first sub-chord deflection.