NivaarExam PrepOfficial exam papers ↗

22-Elec-A3 Signals and Communications · December 2014

Question 5 of 7: Superheterodyne receiver: local-oscillator choice, image frequency and band planning (20 marks)

Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)

Notes on this paper

Paper format. Association of Professional Engineers of Ontario, Annual Examinations — 07-Elec-A3 Signals and Communications, December 2014, 3 hours, closed book (a standard non-programmable calculator is the only aid). Seven questions, all of equal value (20 marks each); the rubric states that any five questions constitute a complete paper and that only the first five appearing in the answer book are marked. All seven are solved here, because the set is a study resource rather than a graded script.

Reference texts.

Two conventions are used throughout. Frequency is written in hertz (variable $f$) whenever the question asks for it in hertz, and in radians per second (variable $\omega = 2\pi f$) only inside time-domain expressions.



Question 5 — Superheterodyne receiver: local-oscillator choice, image frequency and band planning (20 marks)

Question text not reproduced: the examination questions are © Engineers and Geoscientists BC. Open the official past paper (linked at the top of this page) to read the question, then follow the worked solution below.

Given. Intermediate-frequency centre $f_{IF} = 800\ \text{kHz}$; wanted carrier $f_c = 2\ \text{MHz}$; channel bandwidth $B_{ch} = 20\ \text{kHz}$; a fixed (non-tracking) RF front-end filter; the AM band is centred on 2 MHz.

Find. (a) the two possible local-oscillator frequencies and which is preferable for block tuning; (b) the image frequency for that choice; (c) the frequency range of the band and how many 20 kHz stations it holds.

Approach. The mixer produces the IF from the magnitude of the difference $|f_{LO} - f_c|$, which admits two solutions. Choosing between them is a tuning-ratio argument. The image is then the second input frequency that maps to the same IF, and part (c) turns the image requirement into a limit on how wide a fixed front-end filter can be.

f (MHz)0.81.222.83.6wanted RF 2.0high-side LO 2.8image 3.6IF 0.8low-side LO 1.2fixed RF front-end pass band 1.2 – 2.8 MHz (1.6 MHz wide = 2 × IF)
Frequency plan. High-side injection at 2.8 MHz places the image at 3.6 MHz, outside the 1.2 – 2.8 MHz front-end passband; the band width equals 2 × IF exactly.
  1. Solve the mixing equation for both local-oscillator options. The IF is produced by the difference product, so $|f_{LO} - f_c| = f_{IF}$ and $$f_{LO} = f_c + f_{IF} = 2.0 + 0.8 = 2.8\ \text{MHz} \qquad\text{(high-side injection)},$$ $$f_{LO} = f_c - f_{IF} = 2.0 - 0.8 = 1.2\ \text{MHz} \qquad\text{(low-side injection)}.$$ $$\boxed{\;f_{LO} = 2.8\ \text{MHz}\ \text{or}\ 1.2\ \text{MHz}\;}$$
  2. Choose between them on the tuning-ratio argument. The band is centred at 2 MHz and, as part (c) establishes, spans 1.2–2.8 MHz. Tuning across it requires the oscillator to sweep $$\text{high side: } 2.0\!-\!3.6\ \text{MHz},\ \text{ratio } 1.80; \qquad \text{low side: } 0.4\!-\!2.0\ \text{MHz},\ \text{ratio } 5.00 .$$ Since a variable capacitor’s frequency ratio goes as $\sqrt{C_{\max}/C_{\min}}$, a 1.8:1 sweep is easy and a 5:1 sweep is not. High-side injection also keeps the oscillator entirely above the received band, so its harmonics and leakage cannot fall on a wanted channel. Hence $$\boxed{\;f_{LO} = 2.8\ \text{MHz (high-side injection) is preferable}\;}$$
  3. Locate the image frequency. The image is the other input that differs from the local oscillator by the IF, on the far side: $$f_{\text{image}} = f_{LO} + f_{IF} = f_c + 2f_{IF} = 2.0 + 1.6 \qquad\Longrightarrow\qquad \boxed{\;f_{\text{image}} = 3.6\ \text{MHz}\;}$$ Checking: $|2.8 - 3.6| = 0.8\ \text{MHz} = f_{IF}$, so a station at 3.6 MHz would land on top of the wanted one and no amount of IF selectivity could separate them — image rejection must be done before the mixer.
  4. Turn image rejection into a limit on the band width. With a fixed front-end filter, whatever passes to the mixer is admitted for every channel the radio can tune. Let the band run from $f_L$ to $f_H$. The image of the lowest channel is $f_L + 2f_{IF}$; if that frequency lies inside the band, it is a legitimate station and the filter cannot possibly remove it. Safety therefore requires $$f_L + 2f_{IF} \ge f_H \qquad\Longrightarrow\qquad B_{\text{band}} = f_H - f_L \le 2f_{IF} = 1.6\ \text{MHz}.$$ This is the governing design rule for a fixed-filter superheterodyne: the receivable band can be no wider than twice the IF.
  5. Centre that band on 2 MHz. Taking the widest permissible band and centring it as the question specifies, $$f_L = 2.0 - 0.8 = 1.2\ \text{MHz},\qquad f_H = 2.0 + 0.8 = 2.8\ \text{MHz}$$ $$\boxed{\;\text{AM band } = 1.2\ \text{MHz to } 2.8\ \text{MHz}\;}$$ At the limiting condition the image of the bottom channel lands exactly on the top edge, $1.2 + 1.6 = 2.8\ \text{MHz}$, so the front-end filter has just enough selectivity to do its job. (This is also why the low-side oscillator would have had to reach 0.4 MHz in step 2.)
  6. Count the channels. Each AM station occupies its full 20 kHz bandwidth, so $$N = \frac{B_{\text{band}}}{B_{ch}} = \frac{1.6\times10^{6}}{20\times10^{3}} \qquad\Longrightarrow\qquad \boxed{\;N = 80\ \text{stations}\;}$$ with carriers spaced 20 kHz apart from $1.21\ \text{MHz}$ to $2.79\ \text{MHz}$. If guard bands between adjacent channels were required, the count would fall accordingly.
QuantityResult
(a) Local-oscillator options2.8 MHz (high side) or 1.2 MHz (low side)
(a) Preferred choice2.8 MHz — tuning ratio 1.80 vs 5.00, oscillator clear of the band
(b) Image frequency3.6 MHz $= f_c + 2f_{IF}$
(c) Maximum band width$2f_{IF} = 1.6$ MHz
(c) Band range1.2 MHz – 2.8 MHz
(c) Number of 20 kHz stations80