22-Elec-A3 Signals and Communications · December 2014
Question 5 of 7: Superheterodyne receiver: local-oscillator choice, image frequency and band planning (20 marks)
Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)
Notes on this paper
Paper format. Association of Professional Engineers of Ontario, Annual Examinations
— 07-Elec-A3 Signals and Communications, December 2014, 3 hours, closed book
(a standard non-programmable calculator is the only aid). Seven questions, all of equal value
(20 marks each); the rubric states that any five questions constitute a complete paper and that only
the first five appearing in the answer book are marked. All seven are solved here, because the
set is a study resource rather than a graded script.
Reference texts.
B. P. Lathi and Z. Ding, Modern Digital and Analog Communication Systems, 4th ed. —
amplitude modulation, superheterodyne receivers, PCM, angle modulation.
A. V. Oppenheim, A. S. Willsky and S. H. Nawab, Signals and Systems, 2nd ed. —
Fourier transform properties, convolution, Parseval’s relation, discrete-time systems.
J. G. Proakis and D. G. Manolakis, Digital Signal Processing: Principles, Algorithms and
Applications, 4th ed. — difference equations, transfer functions, BIBO stability.
S. Haykin and M. Moher, Communication Systems, 5th ed. — envelope detection, coherent
detection, sampling and quantisation noise.
Two conventions are used throughout. Frequency is written in hertz (variable $f$) whenever the
question asks for it in hertz, and in radians per second (variable $\omega = 2\pi f$) only inside
time-domain expressions.
Question 5 — Superheterodyne receiver: local-oscillator choice, image frequency and band planning (20 marks)
Given. Intermediate-frequency centre $f_{IF} = 800\ \text{kHz}$; wanted carrier
$f_c = 2\ \text{MHz}$; channel bandwidth $B_{ch} = 20\ \text{kHz}$; a fixed (non-tracking) RF
front-end filter; the AM band is centred on 2 MHz.
Find. (a) the two possible local-oscillator frequencies and which is preferable for
block tuning; (b) the image frequency for that choice; (c) the frequency range of the band and how many
20 kHz stations it holds.
Approach. The mixer produces the IF from the magnitude of the difference
$|f_{LO} - f_c|$, which admits two solutions. Choosing between them is a tuning-ratio argument. The
image is then the second input frequency that maps to the same IF, and part (c) turns the image
requirement into a limit on how wide a fixed front-end filter can be.
Frequency plan. High-side injection at 2.8 MHz places the image at 3.6 MHz, outside the 1.2 – 2.8 MHz front-end passband; the band width equals 2 × IF exactly.
Solve the mixing equation for both local-oscillator options.
The IF is produced by the difference product, so $|f_{LO} - f_c| = f_{IF}$ and
$$f_{LO} = f_c + f_{IF} = 2.0 + 0.8 = 2.8\ \text{MHz}
\qquad\text{(high-side injection)},$$
$$f_{LO} = f_c - f_{IF} = 2.0 - 0.8 = 1.2\ \text{MHz}
\qquad\text{(low-side injection)}.$$
$$\boxed{\;f_{LO} = 2.8\ \text{MHz}\ \text{or}\ 1.2\ \text{MHz}\;}$$
Choose between them on the tuning-ratio argument.
The band is centred at 2 MHz and, as part (c) establishes, spans 1.2–2.8 MHz. Tuning across it
requires the oscillator to sweep
$$\text{high side: } 2.0\!-\!3.6\ \text{MHz},\ \text{ratio } 1.80;
\qquad
\text{low side: } 0.4\!-\!2.0\ \text{MHz},\ \text{ratio } 5.00 .$$
Since a variable capacitor’s frequency ratio goes as $\sqrt{C_{\max}/C_{\min}}$, a 1.8:1 sweep is
easy and a 5:1 sweep is not. High-side injection also keeps the oscillator entirely above the received
band, so its harmonics and leakage cannot fall on a wanted channel. Hence
$$\boxed{\;f_{LO} = 2.8\ \text{MHz (high-side injection) is preferable}\;}$$
Locate the image frequency.
The image is the other input that differs from the local oscillator by the IF, on the far side:
$$f_{\text{image}} = f_{LO} + f_{IF} = f_c + 2f_{IF} = 2.0 + 1.6
\qquad\Longrightarrow\qquad
\boxed{\;f_{\text{image}} = 3.6\ \text{MHz}\;}$$
Checking: $|2.8 - 3.6| = 0.8\ \text{MHz} = f_{IF}$, so a station at 3.6 MHz would land on top of the
wanted one and no amount of IF selectivity could separate them — image rejection must be done
before the mixer.
Turn image rejection into a limit on the band width.
With a fixed front-end filter, whatever passes to the mixer is admitted for every channel the radio can
tune. Let the band run from $f_L$ to $f_H$. The image of the lowest channel is $f_L + 2f_{IF}$; if that
frequency lies inside the band, it is a legitimate station and the filter cannot possibly remove it.
Safety therefore requires
$$f_L + 2f_{IF} \ge f_H
\qquad\Longrightarrow\qquad
B_{\text{band}} = f_H - f_L \le 2f_{IF} = 1.6\ \text{MHz}.$$
This is the governing design rule for a fixed-filter superheterodyne: the receivable band can be no
wider than twice the IF.
Centre that band on 2 MHz.
Taking the widest permissible band and centring it as the question specifies,
$$f_L = 2.0 - 0.8 = 1.2\ \text{MHz},\qquad f_H = 2.0 + 0.8 = 2.8\ \text{MHz}$$
$$\boxed{\;\text{AM band } = 1.2\ \text{MHz to } 2.8\ \text{MHz}\;}$$
At the limiting condition the image of the bottom channel lands exactly on the top edge,
$1.2 + 1.6 = 2.8\ \text{MHz}$, so the front-end filter has just enough selectivity to do its job. (This
is also why the low-side oscillator would have had to reach 0.4 MHz in step 2.)
Count the channels.
Each AM station occupies its full 20 kHz bandwidth, so
$$N = \frac{B_{\text{band}}}{B_{ch}} = \frac{1.6\times10^{6}}{20\times10^{3}}
\qquad\Longrightarrow\qquad
\boxed{\;N = 80\ \text{stations}\;}$$
with carriers spaced 20 kHz apart from $1.21\ \text{MHz}$ to $2.79\ \text{MHz}$. If guard bands between
adjacent channels were required, the count would fall accordingly.
Quantity
Result
(a) Local-oscillator options
2.8 MHz (high side) or 1.2 MHz (low side)
(a) Preferred choice
2.8 MHz — tuning ratio 1.80 vs 5.00, oscillator clear of the band