Question 6 of 7: Single line-to-ground fault on an industrial bus
Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)
Notes on this paper
Paper format. National Exams, May 2016 — 07-Elec-B7 Power Systems Engineering. Open-book, 3 hours duration. Seven problems are printed; any five constitute a complete paper, only the first five appearing in the answer book are marked, and all questions are of equal value (20 points each). All seven are solved in full below, because this set is a study resource rather than a timed sitting.
Reference texts. The syllabus for this code follows M. E. El-Hawary, Electrical Power Systems: Design and Analysis (IEEE Press) — the notation used throughout (the ABCD two-port and its equivalent pi, the two-reaction salient-pole construction, the sequence-network fault reduction) is his, and the phrase “all power formulae in the text” in Problem 1 refers to that book. Corroborating references: J. D. Glover, M. S. Sarma and T. J. Overbye, Power System Analysis and Design, 6th ed. (ch. 3 transformers, ch. 5 transmission lines, ch. 6 power flow, ch. 7–9 faults and symmetrical components, ch. 11 transient stability); J. J. Grainger and W. D. Stevenson, Power System Analysis; and S. J. Chapman, Electric Machinery Fundamentals, 5th ed., for the machine and transformer chapters. Canadian practice references where grounding and protection are discussed: CSA C22.1 Canadian Electrical Code, Part I, CSA C22.3 No. 1 for overhead systems, and IEEE C37 series for protective relaying.
Check: four data points read off the printed figures. (i) In Figure (2) of Problem 4 the three branch reactances are j0.25, j0.20 and j0.10 pu, with bus 4 hanging off bus 2 through the j0.10 branch — the topology is taken from the drawing. (ii) Figure (3) of Problem 5 shows three sources, not two: generators at bus 1 and bus 4 and a third machine below bus 5. The sentence “the voltage at both sources is 1 p.u.” is taken to mean all sources are at 1.0 pu, which is the only reading that lets the network be solved. (iii) In Figure (4-a) of Problem 6, transformer T2 carries its delta on the generator side and T1 carries its delta on the motor side; motor 1 is an ungrounded wye and motor 2 is grounded through a reactor. Those four winding connections, not the reactance values, decide the answer. (iv) Problem 7 gives the switching angles in radians (1.2, 1.25 and 1.9 rad).
Check: Problem 3(a) as printed is over-determined and internally inconsistent. Rated kVA, the load power factor, the efficiency and the primary voltage are four data for two unknowns, and at 0.85 power factor lagging no positive series reactance satisfies them all. The inconsistency is quantified and resolved inside the answer rather than hidden.
Problem 6 — Single line-to-ground fault on an industrial bus (20 points)
Given. A radial industrial system — generator, transformer T2, a transmission circuit, transformer T1 and two synchronous motors — with all three sequence networks already drawn. All internal emfs are 1.0 pu and pre-fault load current is neglected. The winding connections that matter are read from Figure (4-a): T2 has its delta on the generator side and its grounded wye on the bus-2 side; T1 has its grounded wye on the bus-3 side and its delta on the motor side; motor 1 is an ungrounded wye and motor 2 is grounded through a reactor.
Find. The current at bus 3 — that is, the phase currents flowing in the bus-2/bus-3 circuit at the bus-3 end — when a single line-to-ground fault occurs on phase a at bus 2, together with the total fault current itself.
[Figure not reproduced: Figure 8 — the zero-sequence network of Figure (4-d), redrawn to show what actually carries current. Two whole branches (greyed) are decoys: the generator is barred by the T2 delta and motor 1 by its ungrounded wye, and the entire bus-4/5/6 island is cut off from the fault by the T1 delta. See the official exam paper.]
Approach. Reduce each sequence network to its Thevenin reactance seen from bus 2, connect the three in series as a single line-to-ground fault requires, then divide each sequence current between the two paths that meet at bus 2 and recombine the shares that flow in the bus-3 circuit into phase quantities.
Reduce the positive-sequence network at bus 2. Two paths reach the reference from bus 2. To the left, the generator and T2 in series: $0.2+0.1=0.3000$ pu. To the right, the line, T1 and the two motors in parallel: $$0.15+0.1+\frac{(0.35)(0.7)}{0.35+0.7}=0.15+0.1+0.233333=0.483333\ \text{pu}$$ and these two in parallel give $X_1=\dfrac{(0.3000)(0.483333)}{0.783333}=0.185106$ pu.
The negative-sequence network is identical. Figure (4-c) prints the same reactances as Figure (4-b) with the sources removed, so $X_2=X_1=0.185106$ pu. That equality is worth noticing: it is what makes the final phase-current combination collapse so neatly in step 7.
Reduce the zero-sequence network — and identify the decoys. Transformer T2 presents its delta to the generator, so no zero-sequence current can reach the machine and the printed $j1.55+j0.05$ generator branch never enters any answer. Transformer T1 presents its delta to the motors, so the whole bus-4/5/6 island, including motor 2’s grounded neutral, is likewise barred. What remains at bus 2 is the T2 grounded-wye winding, $j0.1$ pu to the reference, in parallel with the line and the T1 grounded-wye winding in series, $j0.5+j0.1=j0.6$ pu: $$X_0=\frac{(0.1)(0.6)}{0.1+0.6}=\boxed{0.085714\ \text{pu}}$$ Two of the four reactances printed in Figure (4-d) are therefore never used, which is the point of the question.
Connect the three networks in series for the ground fault. A single line-to-ground fault on phase a imposes $I_b=I_c=0$ and $V_a=0$, which forces $I_{a0}=I_{a1}=I_{a2}$ and puts the three Thevenin reactances in series across the pre-fault voltage: $$I_{a1}=\frac{E}{j(X_1+X_2+X_0)}=\frac{1.0}{j(0.185106+0.185106+0.085714)}=2.193333\angle -90^{\circ}\ \text{pu}$$
Get the total fault current. The faulted phase carries the sum of the three equal sequence currents: $$I_f=3I_{a1}=\boxed{6.5800\angle -90^{\circ}\ \text{pu}}$$ This exceeds the three-phase fault current at the same bus, $1/X_1=5.4023$ pu, and it must: the single line-to-ground fault is the more severe of the two whenever $X_0 \lt X_1$, which is the case here because the two grounded-wye transformer neutrals form a much stiffer path to earth than the generator and motors do to the positive-sequence network.
Divide each sequence current between the two paths at bus 2. The positive- and negative-sequence currents split in inverse proportion to the two arms: the share flowing in from the bus-3 side is $\dfrac{0.3000}{0.783333}=0.382979$, so $I_1=I_2=0.8400$ pu in that circuit. The zero-sequence current splits between the $0.1$ pu T2 neutral path and the $0.6$ pu path through the line, so only $\dfrac{0.1}{0.7}=0.142857$ of it, that is $I_0=0.3133$ pu, flows in the bus-3 circuit.
Recombine into phase currents at bus 3. With $I_1=I_2$ the operator combination collapses, since $a^{2}+a=-1$: $$I_a=I_0+2I_1,\qquad I_b=I_c=I_0-I_1$$ Substituting the two shares, $$\boxed{|I_a|=1.9933\ \text{pu},\qquad |I_b|=|I_c|=0.5267\ \text{pu}}$$ Note that the healthy phases are not current-free: the zero-sequence share returning through the T1 neutral flows equally in all three conductors, and it does not cancel against the positive- and negative-sequence pair in phases b and c.
Close the answer with a balance check. The remaining share arrives from the bus-1 side, where the phase-a current is $(1-0.1429)I_{a1}+2(1-0.3830)I_{a1}=4.5867$ pu. Adding the two contributions to the faulted phase gives 6.5800 pu, which is $I_f$ — the sum rule is satisfied and the division is therefore right. For completeness the bus-2 voltages during the fault are $V_a=0$ by definition and $|V_b|=|V_c|=0.9108$ pu, so the healthy phases are barely depressed.
Figure 9 — the sequence-network interconnection for a single line-to-ground fault: the three Thevenin reactances in series across the pre-fault voltage.
Check: transformer phase shift. The thirty-degree shift introduced by each delta-wye transformer is ignored, as is standard in a per-unit fault study of this kind. It affects only the angles of currents seen on the far side of T1 or T2, never a magnitude, so no number in the results table changes. Positive- and negative-sequence quantities shift in opposite directions, which is the property that makes the ratio checks above valid on either side.