22-Elec-B8 Power Electronics and Drives · December 2017
Question 4 of 6: Problem 3 — basic chopper, completing the load table
Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)
Notes on this paper
Paper format. National Exams, December 2017 — 16-Elec-B8,
Power Electronics and Drives. Open book, three hours, non-communicating calculator
permitted. The paper is in two parts: Part 1 is twenty short-answer items
(a) to (t) worth 2.5 points each, and Part 2 is five calculation problems
worth 15 points each. The rubric says “attempt all parts” and that the
maximum total score of 125 points includes a bonus of 25 points, so a
candidate scoring 100 of the 125 available marks has a full paper. Every item and
every sub-part is worked below.
Reference texts.
M. H. Rashid, Power Electronics: Circuits, Devices and Applications, 4th ed.
— the primary reference for this exam code.
N. Mohan, T. M. Undeland and W. P. Robbins, Power Electronics: Converters,
Applications and Design, 3rd ed.
B. K. Bose, Modern Power Electronics and AC Drives.
R. Krishnan, Electric Motor Drives: Modeling, Analysis and Control.
C. W. Lander, Power Electronics, 3rd ed.
Question 4: Problem 3 — basic chopper, completing the load table (15 points)
Find. The one missing entry in each row, taking "maximum allowed
current" to mean that the peak of the steady-state ripple reaches exactly 20 A.
Case 1 of the table, drawn over two chopper periods. The current rises towards Vi/R during the on-time and decays through the free-wheeling diode during the off-time; periodicity fixes the two levels. Note the broken current axis: the ripple is 6.6 A on a 20 A peak, so a plot from zero would look flat.
Approach. In steady-state continuous conduction the current rises
exponentially towards $V_i/R$ during the on-time and decays exponentially to zero during
the free-wheel interval; imposing periodicity gives one closed-form expression for
$I_{max}$ in terms of $V_i$, R, $T_{on}$, T and $\tau$, and each case inverts that one
equation for a different unknown.
Derive the peak-current expression. During the on-time the switch
connects the source, so
$i(t)=(V_i/R)+\bigl[I_{min}-(V_i/R)\bigr]e^{-t/\tau}$ and after $T_{on}$ the current has
reached $I_{max}$. During the free-wheel interval there is no source, so the current simply
decays, $i(t)=I_{max}e^{-t/\tau}$, and after $T_{off}=T-T_{on}$ it must have returned to
$I_{min}$ for the waveform to be periodic. Eliminating $I_{min}$ between the two gives
$$\boxed{\;I_{max}=\frac{V_i}{R}\cdot
\frac{1-e^{-T_{on}/\tau}}{1-e^{-T/\tau}}\;}$$
and the trough follows from the free-wheel decay alone, since that interval has no source:
$I_{min}=I_{max}\,e^{-(T-T_{on})/\tau}$. Every row of the table is this one relation solved
for a different symbol, and because $\tau=L/R$ is given directly, L never has to be found
first.
Case 1 — solve for the load resistance. Here
$T_{on}/\tau=2.00/1.25=1.6$ and $T/\tau=2.50/1.25=2.0$, so
$$R=\frac{V_i}{I_{max}}\cdot\frac{1-e^{-1.6}}{1-e^{-2.0}}
=\frac{24}{20}\times\frac{0.798103}{0.864665}=1.2\times 0.923019$$
$$\boxed{\;R_1=1.1076\ \Omega\;}$$
Check Case 1 against the mean. The duty ratio is
$\delta=2.00/2.50=0.800$, so the free-wheel interval leaves
$I_{min}=20\,e^{-0.5/1.25}=13.41$ A and the mean current should be
$\delta V_i/R=0.800\times 24/1.1076=17.33$ A. That lies between $I_{min}$ and $I_{max}$,
as it must. For completeness the inductance is $L=\tau R=1.25\times 1.1076=1.385$ mH.
Case 2 — solve for the chopper period. Rearranging the same
expression for the only unknown,
$$1-e^{-T/\tau}=\frac{V_i}{R\,I_{max}}\bigl(1-e^{-T_{on}/\tau}\bigr)
=\frac{24}{1.15\times 20}\times\bigl(1-e^{-2.5}\bigr)=1.043478\times 0.917915=0.957824$$
so $e^{-T/\tau}=0.042176$ and
$$T=-\tau\ln(0.042176)=1.00\times 3.16591$$
$$\boxed{\;T_2=3.1659\ \text{ms}\;}$$
The result must satisfy $T>T_{on}$, and 3.166 ms against 2.50 ms does; had the algebra
returned a period shorter than the on-time, or a bracket outside the interval from 0 to 1,
the stated data would have been inconsistent.
Check Case 2. The duty ratio is $2.50/3.1659=0.790$, the switching
frequency $1/T=315.9$ Hz, and $I_{min}=20\,e^{-0.6659/1.00}=10.28$ A. The mean
$\delta V_i/R=0.790\times 24/1.15=16.48$ A again sits between the extremes.
$L=\tau R=1.15$ mH.
Case 3 — solve for the on-time. Now
$$1-e^{-T_{on}/\tau}=\frac{R\,I_{max}}{V_i}\bigl(1-e^{-T/\tau}\bigr)
=\frac{0.9\times 20}{24}\times\bigl(1-e^{-1.2/1.5}\bigr)=0.75\times 0.550671=0.413003$$
hence $e^{-T_{on}/\tau}=0.586997$ and
$$T_{on}=-1.5\ln(0.586997)=1.5\times 0.532735$$
$$\boxed{\;T_{on,3}=0.7991\ \text{ms}\;}$$
Check Case 3 and compare the three rows. The duty ratio is
$0.7991/1.2=0.666$, $I_{min}=20\,e^{-0.4009/1.5}=15.31$ A, and the mean
$0.666\times 24/0.9=17.76$ A lies between them. Comparing the rows shows what the table
is teaching: Case 3 has the shortest period relative to its time constant
($T/\tau=0.80$), so its ripple is the smallest — 4.7 A peak-to-peak against 6.6 A in
Case 1 and 9.7 A in Case 2 — even though its steady-state ceiling $V_i/R=26.7$ A is
the highest of the three. Ripple is governed by $T/\tau$, not by the duty ratio.
Confirm every row against the original relation. Substituting each
completed row back into $I_{max}=(V_i/R)(1-e^{-T_{on}/\tau})/(1-e^{-T/\tau})$ returns
20.000 A in all three cases, which is the closing check the table asks for.