22-Elec-B8 Power Electronics and Drives · May 2017
Question 4 of 6: Series smoothing reactors, and a basic chopper with an R-L load
Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)
Notes on this paper
Paper format. National Exams, May 2017 — 16-Elec-B8, Power
Electronics and Drives. Open-book, three hours, six problems of equal value (20 points
each); the rubric states that any five questions constitute a complete paper.
All six problems are worked here, and every sub-part is answered, because this set is a
study resource rather than an exam script.
Reference texts.
M. H. Rashid, Power Electronics: Circuits, Devices and Applications, 4th ed.
— the primary EGBC reference for this exam code.
N. Mohan, T. M. Undeland and W. P. Robbins, Power Electronics: Converters,
Applications and Design, 3rd ed.
B. K. Bose, Modern Power Electronics and AC Drives.
R. Krishnan, Electric Motor Drives: Modeling, Analysis and Control.
C. W. Lander, Power Electronics, 3rd ed.
Question 4: Series smoothing reactors, and a basic chopper with an R-L load (20 points)
Part (a) — Series smoothing reactors in inverter circuits
A series smoothing reactor is a large inductance placed in the dc link between the
source (usually a controlled rectifier or a battery) and the inverter bridge, and it is
fitted for several distinct reasons that happen to be served by the same component.
The first and most important is to make the link behave as a current source.
The rectifier's output is a rippling voltage, not a constant one; a reactor whose
impedance $n\omega L$ at the ripple frequencies greatly exceeds the load's effective
resistance holds the link current nearly constant over each cycle. In a current-fed
inverter this is not an optional refinement — it is what makes the topology work,
because the bridge must be handed a stiff current to commutate in blocks.
The second reason is protection. The reactor limits $\mathrm{d}i/\mathrm{d}t$ during
commutation and during faults. If an inverter leg mis-fires or a load short develops, the
rate of rise of fault current is held to $V_d/L$, which gives the protection time to act
and keeps the fault current within the thyristors' $I^{2}t$ withstand. Without it, a
shoot-through in a stiff-voltage link is limited only by stray inductance and is usually
destructive.
The third reason is to decouple the source from the inverter's switching transients. The
reactor blocks the high-frequency components generated by the bridge from propagating back
into the rectifier and onto the supply, reducing the harmonic current injected into the ac
system and the interference conducted along the dc cabling. Conversely, it prevents supply
notches and rectifier commutation dips from disturbing the inverter's own commutation
circuits.
Fourth, it provides energy storage. During each commutation interval the load
must be handed current while the outgoing device recovers; the reactor supplies that
current at essentially constant magnitude, which keeps the machine torque smooth and avoids
the current collapse that would otherwise occur. Finally, in a rectifier-fed drive the
reactor keeps conduction continuous down to light load: without it the current becomes
discontinuous at low torque, the transfer characteristic of the converter becomes
non-linear, the mean voltage rises unexpectedly and any speed loop tuned for continuous
conduction becomes badly damped.
Parts (b), (c) and (d) — The chopper
Given.
Quantity
Symbol
Value
Input (source) voltage
$V_i$
28 V
Chopper period
$T$
2 ms
Load resistance
$R$
1.8 Ω
Load inductance
$L$
$0.45\times10^{-3}$ H
Ripple ratio
$I_{min}/I_{max}$
0.75
Sample instants
$t$
1 ms and 1.5 ms
Find. The load time constant and on-time; the maximum and minimum output currents; and the time-domain current expressions together with their values at $t = 1$ ms and $t = 1.5$ ms.
Figure 4.1 — Steady-state chopper current. Because $\tau = 0.25$ ms is only one eighth of the period, the current is essentially at $V_i/R$ for most of the ON interval and the whole ripple is produced in the last 0.072 ms; note the broken current axis. Both requested sample instants fall inside the ON interval.
Approach. Use the free-wheel decay to convert the ripple ratio into the off-time, take the on-time from the period, then apply the periodic steady-state matching condition to fix the current levels and write the two exponential segments.
Part (b) — Load time constant. The load is a simple series R-L, so $$\tau = \frac{L}{R} = \frac{0.45\times10^{-3}}{1.8} = \boxed{0.25\ \text{ms}}.$$ This is one eighth of the 2 ms chopper period, which will turn out to dominate the character of the answer.
Get the off-time from the ripple ratio alone. When the switch opens, the load current free-wheels through the diode with no source in the loop, so it decays purely exponentially from $I_{max}$ towards zero: $i(t) = I_{max}e^{-t/\tau}$. At the end of the off interval it has reached $I_{min}$, hence $$\frac{I_{min}}{I_{max}} = e^{-t_{off}/\tau} \;\Longrightarrow\; t_{off} = -\tau\ln(0.75) = 0.25\times 0.287682 = 0.07192\ \text{ms}.$$ Notice that the current magnitudes never entered — the ratio by itself fixes the off-time.
The on-time follows from the period. $$t_{on} = T - t_{off} = 2.0 - 0.07192 = \boxed{1.92808\ \text{ms}},$$ a duty ratio of $\delta = t_{on}/T = 0.9640$. Such a high duty ratio is the direct consequence of $\tau \ll T$: with so fast a decay, only a very short free-wheel interval is needed to drop the current by 25%.
Part (c) — Maximum output current. In the steady state the current at the end of the ON interval must equal $I_{max}$, and matching the two exponentials around the cycle gives the standard result $$I_{max} = \frac{V_i}{R}\cdot\frac{1 - e^{-t_{on}/\tau}}{1 - e^{-T/\tau}} = 15.5556\times\frac{1 - 4.4728\times10^{-4}}{1 - 3.3546\times10^{-4}} = \boxed{15.554\ \text{A}}.$$
Minimum output current, and the mean as a check. The ripple ratio gives directly $$I_{min} = 0.75\,I_{max} = \boxed{11.665\ \text{A}}.$$ As an independent check, the mean voltage applied to the load is $\delta V_i$ and the mean voltage across $L$ over a period is zero, so $I_{mean} = \delta V_i/R = 0.9640\times 28/1.8 = 14.996$ A. That lies between $I_{min}$ and $I_{max}$ as it must, and sits close to $I_{max}$ because the current spends almost the whole period near its ceiling.
Part (d) — Time-domain expression during the ON interval. Measuring $t$ from the instant the switch closes, the load sees $V_i$ across $R + sL$ starting from $I_{min}$, so $$i_{on}(t) = \frac{V_i}{R}\left(1 - e^{-t/\tau}\right) + I_{min}e^{-t/\tau} = 15.556 - 3.891\,e^{-t/0.25\ \text{ms}},\qquad 0 \le t \le 1.92808\ \text{ms}.$$
Time-domain expression during the free-wheel interval. Measuring $t'$ from the instant the switch opens, $$i_{off}(t') = I_{max}e^{-t'/\tau} = 15.554\,e^{-t'/0.25\ \text{ms}},\qquad 0 \le t' \le 0.07192\ \text{ms}.$$ The two expressions are boxed together as the answer to the first half of part (d); note that the off-interval exponential is measured from turn-off, not from the start of the period.
Evaluate at the two requested instants. Both 1 ms and 1.5 ms are less than $t_{on} = 1.92808$ ms, so both fall inside the ON interval and $i_{on}$ is the expression to use in each case: $$i(1\ \text{ms}) = 15.556 - 3.891\,e^{-4} = 15.556 - 0.0713 = \boxed{15.484\ \text{A}},$$ $$i(1.5\ \text{ms}) = 15.556 - 3.891\,e^{-6} = 15.556 - 0.0096 = \boxed{15.546\ \text{A}}.$$ Checking the instant against $t_{on}$ before choosing the expression is essential: had 1.5 ms fallen in the free-wheel interval, the ON expression would have returned a value above $I_{max}$, which is itself the tell that the wrong branch was used.
Final results.
Quantity
Symbol
Result
Load time constant
$\tau = L/R$
0.25 ms
Off-time
$t_{off}$
0.07192 ms
On-time
$t_{on}$
1.92808 ms
Duty ratio
$\delta = t_{on}/T$
0.9640
Maximum output current
$I_{max}$
15.554 A
Minimum output current
$I_{min}$
11.665 A
Mean output current (check)
$I_{mean} = \delta V_i/R$
14.996 A
Current at $t = 1$ ms
$i(1\ \text{ms})$
15.484 A
Current at $t = 1.5$ ms
$i(1.5\ \text{ms})$
15.546 A
Check: with $\tau = T/8$ the load is electrically very fast compared with the switching period, so the required 25% ripple can only be obtained at a duty ratio of 0.964 and the current is flat at $V_i/R$ for 96% of the cycle. The two sample instants therefore both return values within 0.5% of the ceiling. That is what the stated data give; in a real design the remedy for so short a free-wheel window is a higher switching frequency or more series inductance, not a different duty ratio.