22-Elec-B8 Power Electronics and Drives · May 2017
Question 6 of 6: Types of dc drive, and a bridge-fed separately excited dc motor
Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)
Notes on this paper
Paper format. National Exams, May 2017 — 16-Elec-B8, Power
Electronics and Drives. Open-book, three hours, six problems of equal value (20 points
each); the rubric states that any five questions constitute a complete paper.
All six problems are worked here, and every sub-part is answered, because this set is a
study resource rather than an exam script.
Reference texts.
M. H. Rashid, Power Electronics: Circuits, Devices and Applications, 4th ed.
— the primary EGBC reference for this exam code.
N. Mohan, T. M. Undeland and W. P. Robbins, Power Electronics: Converters,
Applications and Design, 3rd ed.
B. K. Bose, Modern Power Electronics and AC Drives.
R. Krishnan, Electric Motor Drives: Modeling, Analysis and Control.
C. W. Lander, Power Electronics, 3rd ed.
Question 6: Types of dc drive, and a bridge-fed separately excited dc motor (20 points)
Part (a) — Classification of dc drives, and the variables they control
Types of dc drive by input supply. Dc drives divide first according to
whether the incoming supply is alternating or already direct.
AC-fed (phase-controlled, rectifier-type) drives take an ac supply and use a
line-commutated thyristor converter to produce a variable dc armature voltage. Within this
family the subdivisions are by phase number and converter configuration:
single-phase drives — half-wave for very small motors (fractional
kW), the half-controlled or semi-converter bridge for two-quadrant motoring with a lower
device count and better input power factor, and the fully-controlled bridge where inversion
is required; and three-phase drives — the half-controlled bridge,
the fully-controlled six-pulse bridge (the configuration of this question, used from a few
kW to several MW), and the twelve-pulse arrangement for very large drives where supply
harmonics must be reduced. Where four-quadrant operation is needed, two fully-controlled
bridges are connected back-to-back as a dual converter, either with
circulating current through reactors or in circulating-current-free mode. Line-commutated
converters are simple and rugged, but they draw a lagging displacement current that worsens
as the firing angle increases, and they inject characteristic harmonics into the supply.
DC-fed (chopper) drives take an existing dc supply — a battery, a traction
third rail or overhead line, a fuel cell, or a diode rectifier with a dc link — and
use a dc-to-dc converter to vary the armature voltage. Classified by quadrant capability
these are the class-A (first-quadrant) chopper for motoring only, the class-B
(second-quadrant) chopper for regenerative braking, the class-C two-quadrant chopper, and
the class-E four-quadrant chopper for full reversing service. Chopper drives switch at
several hundred hertz to several kilohertz rather than at line frequency, so they give a
much faster current loop, smaller armature current ripple for the same inductance, and a
near-unity input displacement factor; they are standard in traction and battery vehicles.
Variables controlled in a dc variable-speed drive. The separately
excited dc machine obeys $E_b = k\Phi\omega$ and $T = k\Phi I_a$, with
$V_a = E_b + I_aR_a$. These three equations identify what is worth manipulating.
Armature voltage $V_a$ — the principal speed control below base
speed. With the field held at rated flux, speed is very nearly proportional to $V_a$, and
the full rated torque remains available at every speed, so this is the
constant-torque region. In a rectifier drive $V_a$ is set by the firing angle
$\alpha$, which is therefore the actual manipulated variable.
Field current, i.e. flux $\Phi$ — used above base speed, once
$V_a$ has reached its ceiling. Weakening the field raises speed in inverse proportion but
reduces available torque for the same armature current, giving the
constant-power region. The field is fed from its own small controlled
rectifier.
Armature current $I_a$ — controlled in an inner, faster loop
inside the speed loop. Because torque is proportional to $I_a$ at fixed flux, this loop is
the torque loop; it also enforces the current limit that protects the commutator and the
converter during acceleration and stalls.
Speed $\omega$ (and, in servo applications, shaft position) —
the outermost loop, closed on a tachogenerator or encoder, whose output is the current
reference.
The cascade structure — speed loop commanding a current loop commanding a firing
angle — is what allows a dc drive to hold speed accurately while never exceeding a
safe armature current, and it is the arrangement used in the drive analysed below.
Part (b) — Completing the drive table
Given.
Quantity
Symbol
Value
Supply voltage (line-to-line, rms)
$V_{LL}$
230 V
Converter
—
three-phase fully-controlled bridge
Machine
—
separately excited dc motor
Case A
$\alpha$, $I_a$, $n$
45°, 125 A, 1720 rpm
Case B
$\alpha$, $I_a$, $n$
60°, 125 A, 1000 rpm
Case C
$\alpha$, $I_a$
65°, 125 A
Case D
$I_a$
100 A
Find. The rectifier output voltage, armature-circuit resistance, back emf, shaft speed, firing angle and output torque needed to complete all four rows.
Figure 6.1 — Transfer characteristic of the three-phase fully-controlled bridge, with the four operating cases marked. Cases A, B and C are given firing angles; case D is the angle deduced in step 8.
Approach. Write the bridge transfer characteristic and the armature loop equation; difference the two constant-current cases to eliminate $I_aR_a$ and isolate $k_e$; back-substitute for $R_a$; then complete each remaining row by forward substitution.
Part (b) — Write the converter transfer characteristic. For a three-phase fully-controlled bridge the mean output voltage in continuous conduction is $$V_{dc} = \frac{3\sqrt{2}}{\pi}V_{LL}\cos\alpha = 1.35047\times230\times\cos\alpha = 310.61\cos\alpha\ \text{V}.$$ Note the constant: $3\sqrt{2}/\pi$ goes with the line-to-line rms voltage supplied here. Evaluating for the three given angles, $$V_A = 219.63\ \text{V},\qquad V_B = 155.30\ \text{V},\qquad V_C = 131.27\ \text{V}.$$
Exploit the fact that the armature current is the same in cases A and B. The armature loop equation is $V_{dc} = E_b + I_aR_a$ with $E_b = k_e n$. Because $I_a = 125$ A in both cases, the term $I_aR_a$ is identical in both, and differencing the two loop equations cancels it entirely: $$V_A - V_B = k_e(n_A - n_B) \;\Longrightarrow\; k_e = \frac{219.63 - 155.30}{1720 - 1000} = \frac{64.33}{720} = \boxed{0.089346\ \text{V/rpm}}.$$ This is the step that makes the problem solvable with no motor nameplate data at all.
Recover the armature-circuit resistance. Substituting $k_e$ back into either loop equation, $$R_a = \frac{V_A - k_en_A}{I_a} = \frac{219.634 - 153.675}{125} = \frac{65.959}{125} = \boxed{0.5277\ \Omega},$$ and case B independently returns $(155.305 - 89.346)/125 = 0.5277\ \Omega$, confirming the pair.
Fill in the back emfs for the two given cases. $$E_A = k_en_A = 0.089346\times1720 = \boxed{153.68\ \text{V}},\qquad E_B = k_en_B = 0.089346\times1000 = \boxed{89.35\ \text{V}}.$$
Case C — back emf and shaft speed. The firing angle is given and the current is unchanged, so the loop equation runs forwards: $$E_C = V_C - I_aR_a = 131.269 - 125(0.52767) = 131.269 - 65.958 = \boxed{65.31\ \text{V}},$$ $$n_C = \frac{E_C}{k_e} = \frac{65.31}{0.089346} = \boxed{731.0\ \text{rpm}}.$$
Establish the torque constant and fill the torque column. Shaft torque is developed power divided by mechanical speed, and the developed power is $E_bI_a$ — not $V_{dc}I_a$, which includes the armature copper loss. Since $E_b = k_en$ with $n$ in rpm, $$T_a = \frac{E_bI_a}{\omega} = \frac{k_e n I_a}{2\pi n/60} = k_e\frac{60}{2\pi}I_a = 0.85319\,I_a.$$ The torque therefore depends only on the current, so cases A, B and C all develop the same torque: $$T_A = T_B = T_C = 0.85319\times125 = \boxed{106.65\ \text{N}\cdot\text{m}}.$$ As a check, computing case A the long way gives $153.68\times125/(2\pi\times1720/60) = 106.65$ N·m, and case C gives the same, which validates $k_e$, $R_a$ and $n_C$ together.
Case D — identify the missing constraint. Case D supplies only $I_a = 100$ A and asks for both $\alpha$ and $n$; one loop equation cannot determine two unknowns, so a further condition is required. The physically natural one, and the one adopted here, is that the drive's speed loop holds the shaft at the case-C speed of 731.0 rpm while the load torque falls, which is exactly what a speed-regulated drive does when the load lightens. The general locus without that assumption is $n = \left[310.61\cos\alpha - 100(0.5277)\right]/0.089346$.
Case D — complete the row under that assumption. Holding the speed holds the back emf, so $E_D = E_C = 65.31$ V and $$V_D = E_D + I_aR_a = 65.31 + 100(0.5277) = \boxed{118.08\ \text{V}},$$ $$\cos\alpha_D = \frac{118.077}{310.609} = 0.38015 \;\Longrightarrow\; \boxed{\alpha_D = 67.66^\circ},$$ $$T_D = 0.85319\times100 = \boxed{85.32\ \text{N}\cdot\text{m}}.$$ For contrast, had the firing angle instead been left at 65° while the load fell to 100 A, the machine would have accelerated to 878.6 rpm — the figure is quoted so a marker can see the alternative reading was considered.
Check — two assumptions made explicit. (1) Case D is under-determined as printed: with only $I_a = 100$ A given, the loop equation contains two unknowns. It has been completed on the assumption that the drive holds the case-C shaft speed of 731.0 rpm while the load current falls, which is the reading that adds the least information and is what a speed-regulated drive actually does. The alternative reading (firing angle left at 65°) is quoted in step 8 and gives 878.6 rpm. (2) The deduced $R_a = 0.528\ \Omega$ dissipates 8.24 kW at 125 A against 19.21 kW of mechanical output in case A. That is high for the machine winding alone, so the column heading is read as the resistance of the armature circuit, which properly includes the converter's equivalent commutation resistance, the line reactance drop and any series smoothing reactor. It satisfies both given operating points exactly, so it is reported as the data give it.